Skip to main content

Authors - L

A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z

M. D. Lachlan

Anna Lachowska (with Apoorva Khare)

R. A. Lafferty

Alex Lamb

Nick Lane

Philippa Lang

Charles Langmuir (with Wally Broecker)

  • How to Build a Planet ***
  • Graham Lappin

    Rich Larson

    Mark Lasbury

    Robert Laughlin

    J. L. Lawrence

    Eric Lax

    Cathy Lazere (with Dennis Shasha)

    James Le Fanu

    Ursula Le Guin

    Hervé Le Tellier (Trans. Adriana Hunter)

    Tom Lean

    Ann Leckie

    Leon Lederman (with Christopher Hill)

    Leon Lederman (with Dick Teresi)

    Jonah Lehrer

    Fritz Leiber

    Stanislaw Lem

    Michael Lemonick

    Armand Leroi

    Nigel Lesmoir-Gordon (with Will Rood and Ralph Edney)

    Richard Lester

    Hector Levesque

    Mark Levi

    Frank Levin

    Janna Levin

    Yasha Levine

    Dan Levitt

    Steven Levitt (with Stephen Dubner)

    Tim Lewens

    Mark Leyner (with Billy Goldberg)

    Gideon Lichfield (Ed.)

    Thomas Lin

    David Linden

    Grace Lindsay

    Martin Lindstrom

    Chris Lintott

    Chris Lintott (with Patrick Moore, Brian May)

    Lewis Little

    David Livingston

    Mario Livio

    Charles Lockwood

    William Bryant Logan

    Mun Keat Looi (with Colin Stuart)

    Jonathan Losos

    Rosaly Lopes (with Michael Carroll)

    Karen Lord

    David Love

    Catherine Loveday

    James Lovelock

    Pete Lunn

    Mark Lynas

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    How Life Works - Philip Ball *****

    Wow. This is quite simply the best biology book I've ever read. At its heart are two essentials: one is the science mantra 'It's more complex than we thought', and the other is that the public at large - and even many biologists - have put too much focus on genetics as the central shaping force of life and the inner development and workings of organisms, coming close to ignoring the many other layers of complex systems that make life what it is and drive evolution. You would think we would have got the message about 'It's more complex than we thought,' and the associated concept that 'It's more complex than we tell you at school or in science TV shows' by now. It's true of all the sciences. In physics, for example, we've known that the reality is more complicated than 'light is wave' for over a century now. But biological systems are so vastly more intricate and messy than anything dealt with in physics. Until recently, even those

    Fluke - Brian Klaas ****

    On the whole, popular science books tell us about what science and scientists have achieved. Fluke is very different in this respect - in it, social scientist and professor of global politics Brian Klaas tells us about what the social sciences have failed to achieve, and why. Perhaps the most familiar aspects of this are in introducing the reader to the implications of chaos theory and of complexity, plus the fall out of the replication crisis that has rendered many older (and quite a few new) social science studies useless. Using plenty of engaging stories (including the fact that his own existence is the outcome, amongst other things, of a horrific killing) Klaas builds a picture of just how many small inputs come together to make anything happen in the complex system of human society. The implication of this is that is practically impossible to usefully predict the future in the social sciences (so much for Asimov's psychohistory) - in fact, hardly any social science (which incl

    A Chorus of Big Bangs - Adam Susskind ***

    This is an oddity, which is trying to do something that scientists usually avoid at all costs: making us think about what we take on faith when we consider cosmology. If the 'F' word is a problem for you, I wouldn't bother to read any further, but Adam Susskind is certainly right to point out it is not just the religious part of the world population who rely on faith - to take the atheist standpoint that most scientists espouse also requires faith in the adequacy of sometimes tenuous theories when dealing with a science as hands-off as cosmology. Susskind does a good job of identifying a range of cosmological theories that have been repeatedly patched up when holes have been found, to the extent that some now feel quite flaky. Many of the theories Susskind identifies are indeed currently problematic, but easily replaced by a better future scientific theory - for example dark matter, dark energy and inflation. Others are more fundamental and we genuinely don't have a par