As the book opens, Seb Butcher gives us a parallel between the concerns about ultra-processed foods in our diet and about the ultra-processed information we receive online, particularly through social media. The prime concern here is the way that social media has supplanted news media and distorts our views, particularly through algorithmic rabbit holes. Butcher describes what we experience as distortion loops, driven by a combination of the narrowing of our information diets, the warping of facts and rewarding outrage. Combined with a collapse of trust in institutions, science and experts and a mass of disinformation this, he argues, is having a hugely destructive impact on humanity.  At one point Butcher notes 'Much of what we have just covered [in the current chapter], however disheartening or infuriating it is to read, will probably not be news to you. And that's because, in some shape or form, you likely see and feel it every day: the frayed trust, the quiet scepticism, th...

Bradley Efron is Max Stein Professor emeritus of Statistics and of Biomedical Data Science at Stanford University. He is the inventor of the bootstrap method for assessing statistical accuracy and has published extensively on the theory and practice of data analysis. He has served as president of the American Statistical Association and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.  A MacArthur fellow, he is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and received the National Medal of Science in 2005. His remarkable contributions to his field were recognized again with the 2018 International Prize in Statistics, which noted his influence on 'statistical thinking in every way, including new pathways in how we communicate and teach statistics to all.' His latest book is To Think Like a Statistician . Why mathematics?   Abstract mathematics and I had an amicable divorce following my Caltech graduation. (I really wasn’t very good at it.) Statistics is a branch of applied mathematics...

This book will particularly appeal to a certain class of person (that certainly includes me) - science fiction fans with an interest in psychology and the history of science/pseudo-science. The subtitle 'an unnatural history of technology in the brain' makes it clear that, though the book is definitely about using technology to influence and access the brain, it's not about medical interventions, but rather the weirder stuff that resides as much in science fiction and the human imagination as anything that is real or practical. Although the book is not about SF per se, it's a constant thread particularly in literature, TV, and film from the mid-sixties onwards and inevitably with a strong link to cyberpunk, which is timely given the Apple TV adaptation of Neuromancer due in 2027. However, there are plenty of surprises in the real world examples from the remarkable story of James Tilly Matthews, encarcerated in Bedlam (the Bethlem Royal Hospital) in the early 1800s who ...

As Tania Lombrozo makes clear, we have been bombarded over the years with ideas of what makes humans special (if anything at all) - this new suggestion is that it is about eliciting explanations. Having made the case for story as our definitive behaviour in Brainjacking , I can't entirely agree with Lombrozo's assertion that explanation trumps story because 'many of our explanations take the form of stories, and often we seek stories when we want to answer why. So an even better characterisation might be this: humans are the primates who explain - distinctive amongst the world's flora and fauna in our drive to understand .' Given we are told that explanation is a subset of story (which does a lot more in its unique nature), this hardly seems a good explanation of why explanation is a better characterisation. Along the way, Lombrozo makes powerful use of case studies (stories) to make her points, though sometimes these backfire a little when she repeatedly comes bac...

This is a book in the 'compact collection of science/maths essays' category beloved of publishers because they can charge hardback prices for fewer than 80 pages of text - but don't let that put you off, because it's excellent. Terence Tao introduces six areas of mathematics: numbers, algebra, geometry, probability, analysis and dynamics. Each of these is descriptive rather than practical (there are only a couple of school-level equations in sight), done in a way that gets to the heart of 'what's the point of this subject' with precision and a good level of storytelling. It's a shame in a way that analysis and dynamics form the final third of the book (apart from a short epilogue), because they don't work as well as the other sections. For the first four, practically everyone will have a vague idea of what they are and what they do - but Tao is then able to open our eyes to their wonders and power. Because Tao has to stay away from any detail of what...

A quote on the back cover of this book describes it as monumental - it certainly feels big enough to use as part of a structure with 664 pages plus a further 112 pages of end notes. Colin Gillespie's aim is to 'bring together centuries of ancient thought and modern insights to unearth what is real and what is not'. That certainly sounds like it would need a lot of pages, if it is to be achieved at all. A starting point is to establish what 'real' means. Gillespie gives us the guidance that 'to accept something as truly real, it must be an accurately described objective aspect of the universe.' That may seem obvious, but as he points out 'little in philosophy or physics even aims to pass this test.' Gillespie builds a new conception of physics based entirely on space. As he puts it 'space isn't something; it is literally everything.' In this worldview, the universe began with a single 'space quantum' - a Planck-sized six-dimensiona...