This book will particularly appeal to a certain class of person (that certainly includes me) - science fiction fans with an interest in psychology and the history of science/pseudo-science. The subtitle 'an unnatural history of technology in the brain' makes it clear that, though the book is definitely about using technology to influence and access the brain, it's not about medical interventions, but rather the weirder stuff that resides as much in science fiction and the human imagination as anything that is real or practical. Although the book is not about SF per se, it's a constant thread particularly in literature, TV, and film from the mid-sixties onwards and inevitably with a strong link to cyberpunk, which is timely given the Apple TV adaptation of Neuromancer due in 2027. However, there are plenty of surprises in the real world examples from the remarkable story of James Tilly Matthews, encarcerated in Bedlam (the Bethlem Royal Hospital) in the early 1800s who ...
As Tania Lombrozo makes clear, we have been bombarded over the years with ideas of what makes humans special (if anything at all) - this new suggestion is that it is about eliciting explanations. Having made the case for story as our definitive behaviour in Brainjacking , I can't entirely agree with Lombrozo's assertion that explanation trumps story because 'many of our explanations take the form of stories, and often we seek stories when we want to answer why. So an even better characterisation might be this: humans are the primates who explain - distinctive amongst the world's flora and fauna in our drive to understand .' Given we are told that explanation is a subset of story (which does a lot more in its unique nature), this hardly seems a good explanation of why explanation is a better characterisation. Along the way, Lombrozo makes powerful use of case studies (stories) to make her points, though sometimes these backfire a little when she repeatedly comes bac...