Apparently it comes as a surprise to many that medicine was not particularly scientific until the end of the twentieth century (to be honest, it's no surprise to me - we had a GP who used homeopathy in the 90s). Instead it was based on anecdotal guidance - the kind of thing that appeared to work. Evidence-based medicine has since improved the field, trying where possible to base decisions on evidence, ideally based on randomised controlled trials. The first part of Helen Pearson's book covers this well - though I think it's by far the least interesting part of what we discover. Instead what's truly fascinating is the rest of it, looking at a wide range of other fields where evidence was rarely properly used and that are only now starting to dip a toe in the water. These include social policy, policing, conservation, business and education. The main part of the book gives us examples of how bad these areas have been in terms of basing decisions on what's always been ...
Having been captivated by Eva St. John's excellent fantasy Flint in the Bones and its sequel, I looked for anything else by St. John and came across her Quantum Curators series. I initially assumed these were five separate books, starting with The Quantum Curators and the Fabergé Egg , but it would be more accurate to describe it as a single five-volume novel. For me, this turned out to be St. John on training wheels before she hit full capability with Flint in the Bones . Unlike that book, this is science fiction - specifically a many worlds multiverse story, though (initially) there are only two worlds, known by the occupants of one as Alpha and Beta Earths. Ours is Beta, while the other has more advanced technology and has developed a 'quantum stepper' that allows curators to cross into Beta Earth and rescue artefacts that would otherwise be destroyed or lost. The main characters are Neith, an Alpha Earth curator from Egypt (it was a failure to des...