Skip to main content

Jules Howard - Infinite Life interview

Jules Howard is a zoological correspondent, science writer and broadcaster, whose recent book, Wonderdog, won the 2022 Barker Book Prize for non-fiction. He writes on a host of topics relating to zoology, ecology and wildlife conservation and appears regularly in BBC Science Focus magazine and on radio and TV, including BBC Breakfast and Radio 4's Nature Table and The Ultimate Choice. He lives in Northamptonshire with his wife and two children. His latest title is Infinite Life.

Why write about eggs?

Like many, I have always loved those big epic tales, based on science, that chart the evolution of animals – the Cambrian Explosion, fish moving onto the land, early amphibians and reptiles, the demise of dinosaurs and the rise of mammals… Gould, Dawkins, Attenborough did it so well, and I loved this kind of information when I was starting out in zoology. I guess I was always looking for an opportunity to tell my own version of this… and that’s where the eggs idea comes into it.

Eggs came to me in quite a weird way. About six years ago, Patricia Brennan (of duck vagina fame) and I made a virtual reality app where users could travel through a 3D model of a duck vagina. It was a fun, interactive way to communicate how natural selection acts on internal structures, such as the oviduct (the egg tube). It was while setting up the cameras and the lighting in the 3D digital model of this oviduct that I thought… “what an interesting place to tell a story.”

I could see, in that moment, that the egg has gone on its own evolutionary journey throughout the history of animals, and that this story hadn’t really been told in any mainstream way before. I pitched the idea to Elliott & Thompson (publishers) and they really liked it. So off I went… 

Why have eggs been so successful?

For me, two reasons. The egg is a vessel to grow an organism with new combinations of genes that (in most cases) differ from both of their parents. When animals produce lots of eggs, they pump out lots of genetic variations which are, in turn, unthinkingly cut, whittled and shaped by natural selection – in some cases, more ‘successfully’ than rival animal groups who, for instance, may simply adopt to ‘clone’ themselves. Cloning is an effective method that sees organisms reproduce quickly, but (as we see in agriculture sometimes) ‘monocultures’ have a habit of being picked apart, sometimes in one fell swoop, by parasites, for instance. Eggs – these familiar ‘venues’ for genetic mixing – don’t succumb quite so easily, the theory goes.

But eggs, provided they can survive the ravages of their environment and (on land) a hostile, dry atmosphere, are also vessels for sending genes forwards in time. Many animals ‘use’ eggs to get through cold winters or other periods when food becomes scarce. So, in a sense, they are also naturally evolved survival structures. 

You describe a whole range of different egg types over the existence of life on Earth. What do you think might be a future development of eggs?

Researching the book, I found it really interesting how global events, prehistoric periods of climate change for instance, seemed to influence egg evolution. How, at the end of the Carboniferous, for example, when the climate became generally drier, insects and early reptiles appeared to ‘hit upon’ similar shelled eggs at roughly similar times, that then contributed to their continental take-over in subsequent periods.

Could eggs be changing and adapting now, because of our changing climate? Yes, undoubtedly so. I outline in the book, how important museum collections will be in future, to monitor how eggs adapt and change in the coming decades, as our climate warms. There will be winners, of course – some spiders now lay two clutches of eggs a year rather than one, for instance. But there will be losers. Some turtle species, for instance, have been hit hard in recent years, not from high temperatures, but because of unusually heavy, repeated storms that destroy their nesting beaches.

What’s next for you?

This was a really intensive book to research, involving years of very focused, disciplined reading so…  I am taking a break to read more widely again before I hit upon another zoological topic that inspires me as much as Infinite Life. This is the first time I have had a break in writing adult non-fiction for more than ten years!

I do, however, have plenty of children’s books coming down the line, covering evolution, megafauna, bird diversity and classification, insect conservation and more. So, at the moment, I am enjoying helping these colourful books take shape.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

Finally, the weather is improving so I am trying to improve my birdsong identification skills before the summer truly kicks in and the garden goes quiet. Warblers, which all sound quite alike (sorry, ornithologists) are my big focus, so I’ve started using Cornell’s ‘MERLIN’ app on my phone to help me work out which is which.  My plan: I will be able to tell Garden Warblers from Blackcaps with greater than chance results, if it kills me!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on