Skip to main content

Authors - T

A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z

James Tagg

Nassim Nicholas Taleb

Don Tapscott (with Anthony Williams)

Daniel Tammet

Elizabeth Tasker

Jürgen Taut

Fred Taylor

Jeremy Taylor

Jodi Taylor

Kathleen Taylor

Marianne Taylor

Steve Taylor

Adrian Tchaikovsky

Max Tegmark

Nicola Temple (with Catherine Whitlock)

Dick Teresi (with Leon Lederman)

Andrew Thomas

Erica Thompson

Evan Thompson (with Adam Frank and Marcelo Gleiser)

Ken Thompson

Mark Thompson

Rebecca Thompson

Lavie Tidhar

Joe Tidy

Steven Tijms

James Tiptree Junior (Alice Sheldon)

Anne Helen Toomey

David Toomey

Lluis Torner (with Marta Garcia-Matos)

Paola Totaro (with Robert Wainwright)

Terry Treadwell

Timothy Treadwell

Robert Trivers

Roberto Trotta

Dave Trumbore (with Donna Nelson)

Colin Tucker

S. D. Tucker

Chris Turney

Jon Turney

Neil Turok (with Paul Steinhardt)

Stuart Turton

Samuel Turvey

Lyudmila Trut (with Lee Alan Dugatkin)

Neil de Grasse Tyson

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...