Alien Clay (SF) - Adrian Tchaikovsky ****

This 2024 novel is the first of Adrian Tchaikovsky's books I've read - I can certainly see what the fuss is about, though there were a couple of things I really disliked about Alien Clay.

Let's get those negatives out of the way first, so we can get onto the positives. I'm no fan of dystopian fiction - if I want to be depressed, I can read the news. Tchaikovsky sets his book in a space travelling future totalitarian world state, using remote planets as one-way prison colonies. Initially this seems to make no financial sense, but the political prisoners are shipped out because they are cheaper and more disposable than machinery. The central character and narrator, Professor Arton Daghdev has been taken from his relatively privileged lifestyle to be the lowest of the low. Jolly it is not.

The bigger negative, though, is the character himself. Of course rebelling against a totalitarian state should be seen as a positive - but Daghdev's politics are all too reminiscent of irritating student protests in our own world. More to the point, though, he is given to extensive internal monologues, droning on for page after page - about half way through the book I was really tempted to give up, but it the end I just skip read his droning to get to anything happening.

Switching to the positive, I am so glad I did persevere, because the denouement is spectacular. One thing that was brilliant all the way through was Tchaikovsky's envisioning of a genuinely alien flora and fauna, one of the very few times I've seen this achieved. It's stunning. And then, following a disaster to make the dystopian world even less pleasant, we get a huge plot twist. I wasn't a great fan of the way Tchaikovsky presents this, suddenly starting to jump back and forth on the timeline to give little hints of what had happened. But what happens is remarkable.

Oddly, it reminded me of a book from an author that couldn't be more politically different - Robert Heinlein. IThe outcome here feels like Stranger in a Strange Land with better science, but less sex and mysticism. The way things turn out is wonderfully done, I just wish some aspects of the journey (unless we were intended to suffer like Daghdev) was less difficult.

Hardback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support our online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all reviews and Brian's online articles or subscribe free here

Comments

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here. We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...

Search This Blog