Alien Clay (SF) - Adrian Tchaikovsky ****

This 2024 novel is the first of Adrian Tchaikovsky's books I've read - I can certainly see what the fuss is about, though there were a couple of things I really disliked about Alien Clay.

Let's get those negatives out of the way first, so we can get onto the positives. I'm no fan of dystopian fiction - if I want to be depressed, I can read the news. Tchaikovsky sets his book in a space travelling future totalitarian world state, using remote planets as one-way prison colonies. Initially this seems to make no financial sense, but the political prisoners are shipped out because they are cheaper and more disposable than machinery. The central character and narrator, Professor Arton Daghdev has been taken from his relatively privileged lifestyle to be the lowest of the low. Jolly it is not.

The bigger negative, though, is the character himself. Of course rebelling against a totalitarian state should be seen as a positive - but Daghdev's politics are all too reminiscent of irritating student protests in our own world. More to the point, though, he is given to extensive internal monologues, droning on for page after page - about half way through the book I was really tempted to give up, but it the end I just skip read his droning to get to anything happening.

Switching to the positive, I am so glad I did persevere, because the denouement is spectacular. One thing that was brilliant all the way through was Tchaikovsky's envisioning of a genuinely alien flora and fauna, one of the very few times I've seen this achieved. It's stunning. And then, following a disaster to make the dystopian world even less pleasant, we get a huge plot twist. I wasn't a great fan of the way Tchaikovsky presents this, suddenly starting to jump back and forth on the timeline to give little hints of what had happened. But what happens is remarkable.

Oddly, it reminded me of a book from an author that couldn't be more politically different - Robert Heinlein. IThe outcome here feels like Stranger in a Strange Land with better science, but less sex and mysticism. The way things turn out is wonderfully done, I just wish some aspects of the journey (unless we were intended to suffer like Daghdev) was less difficult.

Hardback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support our online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all reviews and Brian's online articles or subscribe free here

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog