Skip to main content

Govert Schilling - Five Way Interview

Govert Schilling is an acclaimed and prize-winning freelance astronomy writer and broadcaster in the Netherlands. His articles appear in Dutch newspapers and magazines, but he also has written for New Scientist, Science and BBC Sky at Night Magazine, and he is a contributing editor of Sky & Telescope. He wrote dozens of books (including a couple of children’s books) on a wide variety of astronomical topics, many of which have been translated into English, German, Italian, and Chinese, among other languages. In 2007, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) named asteroid 10986 Govert after him, and in 2014, he received the David N. Schramm Award for high-energy astrophysics science journalism from the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American Astronomical Society.His latest book is Target Earth.

Why science?

We live in troubling times. Fake news and conspiracy theories abound, and trust in science is diminishing. Many adults don't seem to realize that almost everything that makes our daily life enjoyable - health care, good food, Netflix, and smart phones, to name just a few - wouldn't be there if it weren't for centuries of scientific research. In contrast, young children are usually very interested in science whenever they encounter it, out of pure curiosity. That's why I strongly believe that we should encourage science education in elementary classes. Astronomy and space science (and dinosaurs, of course) are topics that fire the imagination, and therefore are extremely well-suited to spark a lingering interest in the great value of science in general. I know all about it: my career as a science writer really took off when I had my first look at the planet Saturn through a telescope - a truly life-changing experience.

Why this book?

Today, mankind is pretty much aware of the danger of natural disasters like volcanic eruptions and earthquakes, which can kill hundreds or even many thousands of people. Unfortunately, we aren't yet good at predicting these catastrophes, let alone preventing them. Strangely enough, many people don't seem to know anything about the cosmic danger of giant asteroid impacts. Yes, they occur much less frequently, but they can be far more devastating. The good news is that we now have the means of discovering space rocks well before they hit, and even to deflect their orbits so as to prevent an impact that could kill millions. I believe everyone should be aware of the fact that Earth is in the cosmic firing line, but also that science is helping us to 'dodge the bullets'.

How realistic is the idea of changing the orbit of a large asteroid safely?

In 2022, NASA's DART mission successfully changed the orbit of the tiny asteroid moon Dimorphos. In fact, this remarkable feat was my main inspiration to write Target Earth. So yes, we can deflect small potential impactors, provided we have enough warning time. Then again, this was just a first exercise, and there's still a lot to learn, both about the physical properties of asteroids and about the potential dangers of smashing some projectile into an approaching space rock. What's more, while our brute-force counter measures may prevent impacts of objects that are about one or two hundred meters across, we are basically helpless against much larger and much more massive asteroids.

What’s next?

Future facilities, like the Vera Rubin Observatory in northern Chile and the NEO Surveyor due to be launched in the fall of 2027, will discover many more Earth-grazing asteroids, so we will get a much better picture of the risk we're facing. Moreover, several unmanned space missions to asteroids will provide astronomers with more detailed information about their physical makeup. Within ten years or so, we will know our 'enemy' much better, which is always good if you're starting a fight. Then again, politicians generally find it hard to fund a solution for a probem that has not yet presented itself, so I'm afraid we only will seriously start working on a true planetary defense system after astronomers discover that there's an asteroid out there with our name on it. And then it may, of course, be too late...

What’s exciting you at the moment?

As for asteroids, I very much look forward to the results of NASA's Lucy and Psyche missions. But there's so much more going on in astronomy these days. I'm particularly excited about the latest results of the James Webb Space Telescope, that indicate we may have to revise our ideas about the formation and early evolution of the very first galaxies in the baby days of our universe, more than 13 billion years ago. And I can't wait to see the results of both the Vera Rubin Observatory and the 39-meter European Extremely Large Telescope. Both are bound to revolutionise astronomy, and I'm grateful to be around to witness their impact.

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Interview by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...
Post a Comment
Read more

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...
Post a Comment
Read more