Skip to main content

Authors - F

A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z


Brian Fagan

Frank Fahy

Ben Falk

Seb Falk

Dave Farina

Mark Fellowes (Ed.)

Shelly Fan

Patricia Fara

Graham Farmelo

Doyne Farmer

Steven Farmer

Erol Faruk

Kitty Ferguson

Oscar Fernandez

Pedro Ferreira

Georgina Ferry

Richard Feynman

Michelle Feynman (ed.)

Cordelia Fine

Ann Finkbeiner

Ed Finn

Clive Finlayson

Stuart Firestein

Baruch Fischhoff (with John Kadvany)

Len Fisher

Tim Flannery

Dario Floreano (with Nicola Nosengo)

  • Tales from a Robotic World: how intelligent machines will shape our future *****

    • Angus Fletcher

  • Wonderworks: literary invention and the science of stories *****

    • Felix Flicker

  • The Magick of Matter: crystals, chaos and the wizardry of physics ****

    • Simon Flynn

    Joshua Foer

    Peter Forbes

    Peter Forbes (with Tom Grimsey)

    Brian Ford

    Martin Ford

  • Rule of the Robots: how artificial intelligence will transform everything ****
  • The Rise of the Robots: technology and the threat of mass unemployment *****

    • Judy Foreman

    Jeff Forshaw (with Brian Cox)

    Richard Fortey

    Lance Fortnow

    Fiona Fox

    Adam Frank

    Adam Frank (with Marcelo Gleiser and Evan Thompson)

    Lone Frank

    Daniel Franklin

    Mark Frary

    Giovanni Frazzetto

    Matthew Frederick (with John Kuprenas)

    John Freely

    Chris French

    Art Friedman (with Leonard Susskind)

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

    Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

    History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

    This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
    Post a Comment
    Read more