Skip to main content

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure.

When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success.

When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up, feeling that here, somehow, was the secret of the (business) universe. Similarly I felt Hidalgo was revealing to me a new reality in the way that knowledge impacts economies. The prose is somewhat more academic and restrained, but we get the same mix of personal achievements of the author and real life stories, whether it be the rebel 21-year-old from the Midlands who transported the Industrial Revolution to the US or how a Chinese entrepreneur learned from the knowledge-based synergistic relationships between US universities and businesses.

Unfortunately, as was also the case with those old business books, after the initial euphoria it becomes difficult to see how you can learn any practical lessons to change the way a business (or a government) operates. We are given examples, but they often feel too unique to be useful. Even Hidalgo mentions that every case has to deal with specific circumstances - there are no simple, transferable solutions here. We can all nod and agree that Netflix got it right where Blockbuster didn't, for instance - but I'm not sure how much it prepares us for the next situation where knowledge pushes us in a new direction.

You may have noticed a certain lack of reference to the 'infinite alphabet' of the title. That's because I have very little idea of what it has to do with the content of the book - it seems to be something vague about the many ways that different factors can come together... or something else. It's beyond me.

To some extent, then, I'm saying that I got very little from this book. But I enjoyed doing it, and Hidalgo does produce a similar buzz to the Tom Peters effect. It was a better book than Hidalgo's earlier Why Information Grows (which I also reviewed as interesting but, in classic MIT Media Lab style, not relevant to the real world). There's definitely something absorbing here observationally, I just can't see it being useful practically.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more