Skip to main content

Louise Devoy - Five Way Interview

Dr Louise Devoy is Senior Curator at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, UK. Louise has a background in astrophysics and the history of science. She has worked at various museums in the UK and is interested in astronomical instruments, women in astronomy and historic observatories. She is author of Royal Observatory Greenwich: A History in Objects, published to celebrate the Observatory’s 350th anniversary in 2025. 

Why science?

I'm curious about the world around me and science is great way to ask questions. I love digging into the history of science to see how our ideas have changed over time and to appreciate how science runs in parallel with the trends of the period, whether it's improving navigation for trade or using innovative technologies to create exciting new fields of study.

Why this book?

Various books have been written about certain aspects of the Observatory's history (longitude, timekeeping, the Astronomers Royal etc) but I wanted to do something more holistic that that showed how astronomers at Greenwich worked across many different topics including magnetism, meteorology, weights and standards, astrophysics, and even measuring the density of the Earth.  I've spent the past five years rummaging through the collection stores and archives to pick out the most interesting (and surprising!) objects, some of which have never have been highlighted before. It's a quirky mixture of technical objects (telescopes, clocks, instruments) along with less obvious objects that give us an insight into what it was like to live and work on site.

What has been the most lasting impact of the Royal Observatory Greenwich? 

It's the global reference location for time and longitude. Every time you look at a watch or a map, you're relying on the countless people who worked here to transform star data into essential information for coordinating time across navigation, travel and trade.

What’s next?

We're working on First Light, which is our ambitious project to completely transform the Observatory site by 2028 with more engaging and accessible displays and facilities. Check our website for more details. 

What’s exciting you at the moment?

We've been working with NAROO colleagues at Paris Observatory to digitise around 2,000 photographic glass plates taken here in Greenwich from 1893-1908. For scientists, these plates offer a fossilised record of how the sky looked over a century ago, giving them the chance to calculate tiny shifts in star positions over time. For historians, these plates give us an insight into the life and work of the astronomers during that period, including the 'lady computers' who were the first women to work as professional astronomers at Greenwich. It's amazing how these small square pieces of glass can give us so much information!

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more