Skip to main content

Authors - O

A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z


James O'Brien

Daniel Oberhaus

  • Extraterrestrial Languages ***

    • Ogi Ogas (with Todd Rose)

    Mick O'Hare

    Hans Ohanian

    Veronica O'Keane

    Arlindo Oliveira

    Randy Olson

    Cathy O'Neil

  • Weapons of Math Destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy ****

    • Luke O'Neil

  • Never Mind the B#ll*cks, here's the Science: a scientist's guide to the biggest challenges facing our species today ***

    • Stephen James O'Meara

    Naomi Oreskes

  • Why Trust Science? ***

    • Jane O'Reilly

    Ben Orlin

  • Math for English Majors: a human take on the universal language *****

    • David Orr (Ed.)

  • Democracy in a Hotter Time ***

    • David Orrell

    Chad Orzel

    David M. Oshinsky

    Julius Mario Ottino (with Bruce Mau)

    Shawn Otto

    Jennifer Ouellette

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

    Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

    History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

    Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more