Skip to main content

The Nexus - Julio Mario Ottino with Bruce Mau ***

Any book on the crossover between art and science walks a risky tightrope - it's very easy to plunge into pretentiousness. Perhaps the main problem is that such books always seem to be driven by the art side, reflecting that perhaps Snow's two cultures concept, where the arts and humanities look down on the sciences, is yet to be resolved. This feeling was not helped by the structure of the book - any title that can get to page 43 before it starts creates a sense of foreboding in the reader who wants to get down to the nitty gritty.

Nonetheless, I've always hoped I would discover an arts/science crossover title that worked - like most people with a scientific background I'm enthusiastic about much of the arts and really want to get a book that fulfils this mix. The book is framed in terms of using the crossover for finding creative solutions to complex problems - a topic I've lectured on - which was particularly encouraging.

Julio Mario Ottino has some powerful points to make. I very much liked the line 'In the popular view, art is about creation, technology about invention, and science about discovery. The reality is more complex.' This is pulled apart at some length. Ottino suggests very different traditional creative processes where, for example, art innovates by starting afresh each time, technology has adaption with disruption and science builds on the past with infrequent disruptions (the last displayed as little wiggles rather than major paradigm shifts). I use the 'P' word as those little wiggles don't reflect the reality of how large 'infrequent disruptions' such as quantum physics can be, providing a total change in the way of looking at things, even if the past still has an input.

I very much like the way that Ottino suggests there ought to be ways to learn from differences across these three disciplines, but he doesn't seem to provide any explanation of how to practically do this (it's a little difficult to be sure, because the book is quite waffly). It's possible that the problem is that the answer is trivial, but that doesn't make much of a book - a bit like diets. The reality of healthy diets is very simple: don't eat too much, get a good balance nutritionally intake. But diet books have to make things a lot more complicated. Here, again, perhaps all we can say is art ought to build more on the past, technology and science should look at starting afresh more - but that's not enough to make a coffee table-sized book.

Here, the diet is 'nexus thinking' (sorry, 'Nexus thinking'), which seems to be a mix of using your whole brain (that old chestnut) and taking an approach that combines traditional 'creative arty' and 'analytical scientific' approaches. To quote (and to get a flavour of the waffly text): 'Surface level Nexus thinking is apparent when technology/science visibly blends with arts, or when hard-core engineering emerges in products infused with raw emotion. But Nexus thinking is also present when analytical thinking and creative thinking synergistically coexist; when deductive and inductive thinking operate side-by-side to complement each other.' Right on.

Overall, I'd say this book has a worthy (I don't mean that as an insult) and sensible goal - but I think Bruce Mau's design goes about dealing with that goal in entirely the wrong way. A big, glossy book with lots of big pictures and lots of vague text in small print isn't a great way to communicate concepts in a practical way. A very good idea, but not the best execution - ironically it tries too hard to be creative in a way that weakens communication.

Hardback:   

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more