Skip to main content

The Nexus - Julio Mario Ottino with Bruce Mau ***

Any book on the crossover between art and science walks a risky tightrope - it's very easy to plunge into pretentiousness. Perhaps the main problem is that such books always seem to be driven by the art side, reflecting that perhaps Snow's two cultures concept, where the arts and humanities look down on the sciences, is yet to be resolved. This feeling was not helped by the structure of the book - any title that can get to page 43 before it starts creates a sense of foreboding in the reader who wants to get down to the nitty gritty.

Nonetheless, I've always hoped I would discover an arts/science crossover title that worked - like most people with a scientific background I'm enthusiastic about much of the arts and really want to get a book that fulfils this mix. The book is framed in terms of using the crossover for finding creative solutions to complex problems - a topic I've lectured on - which was particularly encouraging.

Julio Mario Ottino has some powerful points to make. I very much liked the line 'In the popular view, art is about creation, technology about invention, and science about discovery. The reality is more complex.' This is pulled apart at some length. Ottino suggests very different traditional creative processes where, for example, art innovates by starting afresh each time, technology has adaption with disruption and science builds on the past with infrequent disruptions (the last displayed as little wiggles rather than major paradigm shifts). I use the 'P' word as those little wiggles don't reflect the reality of how large 'infrequent disruptions' such as quantum physics can be, providing a total change in the way of looking at things, even if the past still has an input.

I very much like the way that Ottino suggests there ought to be ways to learn from differences across these three disciplines, but he doesn't seem to provide any explanation of how to practically do this (it's a little difficult to be sure, because the book is quite waffly). It's possible that the problem is that the answer is trivial, but that doesn't make much of a book - a bit like diets. The reality of healthy diets is very simple: don't eat too much, get a good balance nutritionally intake. But diet books have to make things a lot more complicated. Here, again, perhaps all we can say is art ought to build more on the past, technology and science should look at starting afresh more - but that's not enough to make a coffee table-sized book.

Here, the diet is 'nexus thinking' (sorry, 'Nexus thinking'), which seems to be a mix of using your whole brain (that old chestnut) and taking an approach that combines traditional 'creative arty' and 'analytical scientific' approaches. To quote (and to get a flavour of the waffly text): 'Surface level Nexus thinking is apparent when technology/science visibly blends with arts, or when hard-core engineering emerges in products infused with raw emotion. But Nexus thinking is also present when analytical thinking and creative thinking synergistically coexist; when deductive and inductive thinking operate side-by-side to complement each other.' Right on.

Overall, I'd say this book has a worthy (I don't mean that as an insult) and sensible goal - but I think Bruce Mau's design goes about dealing with that goal in entirely the wrong way. A big, glossy book with lots of big pictures and lots of vague text in small print isn't a great way to communicate concepts in a practical way. A very good idea, but not the best execution - ironically it tries too hard to be creative in a way that weakens communication.

Hardback:   

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Infinity Machine - Sebastian Mallaby ****

It's very quickly clear that Sebastian Mallaby is a huge Demis Hassabis fan - writing about the only child prodigy and teen genius ever who was also a nice, rounded personality. After a few chapters, though, things settle down (I'm reminded of Douglas Adams' description of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ) and we get a good, solid trip through the journey that gave us DeepMind, their AlphaGo and AlphaFold programs, the sudden explosion of competition on the AI front and thoughts on artificial general intelligence. Although Mallaby does occasionally still go into fan mode - reading this you would think that AlphaFold had successfully perfectly predicted the structure of every protein, where it is usually not sufficiently accurate for its results to have direct practical application - we get a real feel for the way this relatively unusual company was swiftly and successfully developed away from Silicon Valley. It's readable and gives an important understanding of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nanotechnology - Rahul Rao ****

There was a time when nanotechnology was both going to transform the world and wipe us out - a similar position to our view of AI today. On the positive transformation side there was K. Eric Drexler's visions in the 1986 Engines of Creation. Arguably as much science fiction as engineering possibilities, it predicted the ability to use vast armies of assemblers to put objects together from individual atoms.  On the negative side was the vision of grey goo, out of control nanotechnology consuming all in its path as it made more and more copies of itself. In 2003, for instance, the then Prince Charles made the headlines  when newspapers reported ‘The prince has raised the spectre of the “grey goo” catastrophe in which sub-microscopic machines designed to share intelligence and replicate themselves take over and devour the planet.’ These days the expectations have been eased down a notch or two. Where nanotechnology has succeeded, it has been with the likes of atom-thick mat...
Post a Comment
Read more