Skip to main content

The Nexus - Julio Mario Ottino with Bruce Mau ***

Any book on the crossover between art and science walks a risky tightrope - it's very easy to plunge into pretentiousness. Perhaps the main problem is that such books always seem to be driven by the art side, reflecting that perhaps Snow's two cultures concept, where the arts and humanities look down on the sciences, is yet to be resolved. This feeling was not helped by the structure of the book - any title that can get to page 43 before it starts creates a sense of foreboding in the reader who wants to get down to the nitty gritty.

Nonetheless, I've always hoped I would discover an arts/science crossover title that worked - like most people with a scientific background I'm enthusiastic about much of the arts and really want to get a book that fulfils this mix. The book is framed in terms of using the crossover for finding creative solutions to complex problems - a topic I've lectured on - which was particularly encouraging.

Julio Mario Ottino has some powerful points to make. I very much liked the line 'In the popular view, art is about creation, technology about invention, and science about discovery. The reality is more complex.' This is pulled apart at some length. Ottino suggests very different traditional creative processes where, for example, art innovates by starting afresh each time, technology has adaption with disruption and science builds on the past with infrequent disruptions (the last displayed as little wiggles rather than major paradigm shifts). I use the 'P' word as those little wiggles don't reflect the reality of how large 'infrequent disruptions' such as quantum physics can be, providing a total change in the way of looking at things, even if the past still has an input.

I very much like the way that Ottino suggests there ought to be ways to learn from differences across these three disciplines, but he doesn't seem to provide any explanation of how to practically do this (it's a little difficult to be sure, because the book is quite waffly). It's possible that the problem is that the answer is trivial, but that doesn't make much of a book - a bit like diets. The reality of healthy diets is very simple: don't eat too much, get a good balance nutritionally intake. But diet books have to make things a lot more complicated. Here, again, perhaps all we can say is art ought to build more on the past, technology and science should look at starting afresh more - but that's not enough to make a coffee table-sized book.

Here, the diet is 'nexus thinking' (sorry, 'Nexus thinking'), which seems to be a mix of using your whole brain (that old chestnut) and taking an approach that combines traditional 'creative arty' and 'analytical scientific' approaches. To quote (and to get a flavour of the waffly text): 'Surface level Nexus thinking is apparent when technology/science visibly blends with arts, or when hard-core engineering emerges in products infused with raw emotion. But Nexus thinking is also present when analytical thinking and creative thinking synergistically coexist; when deductive and inductive thinking operate side-by-side to complement each other.' Right on.

Overall, I'd say this book has a worthy (I don't mean that as an insult) and sensible goal - but I think Bruce Mau's design goes about dealing with that goal in entirely the wrong way. A big, glossy book with lots of big pictures and lots of vague text in small print isn't a great way to communicate concepts in a practical way. A very good idea, but not the best execution - ironically it tries too hard to be creative in a way that weakens communication.

Hardback:   

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more