Skip to main content

The Midwich Cuckoos (SF) - John Wyndham *****

The recent TV adaptation of John Wyndham's classic science fiction novel inspired me to dig out my copy (which has a much better cover than the current Penguin version) to read it again for the first time in decades - and it was a treat.

Published in 1957, the book takes a cosy world that feels more typical of a 1930s novel - think, for example, of a village in Margery Allingham's or Agatha Christie's books - and applies to it a wonderfully innovative SF concept. Rather than give us the classic H. G. Wells alien invasion, which, as a character points out, is really just conventional warfare with a twist, Wyndham envisaged a far more insidious invasion where the aliens are implanted in every woman of childbearing age in the village (in a period of time known as the Dayout, when everyone is rendered unconscious). 

Apparently like humans but for their bright golden eyes, a joined consciousness and the ability to influence human minds, the Children effectively take over the village. But what's so clever about the book is not just the alien threat itself, but the difficulties it provides for the local people and the authorities when they try to deal with what is gradually realised to be an existential threat to humanity.

Even for 1957, the characters and the book's narration have quite an old-fashioned feel - I suspect Wyndham did this on purpose to emphasise the contrast between this already quaint English setting and the situation that the Dayout brought to the village. The narrator feels like a Wells character, while there's a chief constable of the blustering, thick-as-two-short-planks kind that Allingham celebrated as a wonderful example of Englishness (but now seems bizarrely unprofessional).

The result is a quite cerebral, but truly engaging story as the characters attempt to deal with what initially is pure mystery and later becomes a nightmare with no obvious way out. Because it's almost written as a period piece, the only point at which I felt it was let down by datedness was when Wyndham has a character suggest that there was little evidence for human evolution to our current form: even without DNA evidence, there was plenty of science on the matter already available by the 1950s.

One thing the book did for me was to inspire all sorts of thoughts about how the situation would be different now. One obvious aspect is that there are two house fires that kill people during the Dayout - because heating was largely based on open fires at the time. But the most dramatic difference was the ease with which what was happening was kept secret - something that's hard to imagine with modern communications and social media. I haven't seen the TV show, which has brought the setting forward to the present (and, from a publicity still, misses the whole point of the Children's partially non-individual nature because they all look very different from each other) - in doing so, I can't help but feel it will have lost much of the charm and fascination of the original.

Some classics (whether in science fiction or literature in general) prove distinctly feeble to a modern reader. I'm pleased to say this wasn't the case with The Midwich Cuckoos.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more