Skip to main content

The Midwich Cuckoos (SF) - John Wyndham *****

The recent TV adaptation of John Wyndham's classic science fiction novel inspired me to dig out my copy (which has a much better cover than the current Penguin version) to read it again for the first time in decades - and it was a treat.

Published in 1957, the book takes a cosy world that feels more typical of a 1930s novel - think, for example, of a village in Margery Allingham's or Agatha Christie's books - and applies to it a wonderfully innovative SF concept. Rather than give us the classic H. G. Wells alien invasion, which, as a character points out, is really just conventional warfare with a twist, Wyndham envisaged a far more insidious invasion where the aliens are implanted in every woman of childbearing age in the village (in a period of time known as the Dayout, when everyone is rendered unconscious). 

Apparently like humans but for their bright golden eyes, a joined consciousness and the ability to influence human minds, the Children effectively take over the village. But what's so clever about the book is not just the alien threat itself, but the difficulties it provides for the local people and the authorities when they try to deal with what is gradually realised to be an existential threat to humanity.

Even for 1957, the characters and the book's narration have quite an old-fashioned feel - I suspect Wyndham did this on purpose to emphasise the contrast between this already quaint English setting and the situation that the Dayout brought to the village. The narrator feels like a Wells character, while there's a chief constable of the blustering, thick-as-two-short-planks kind that Allingham celebrated as a wonderful example of Englishness (but now seems bizarrely unprofessional).

The result is a quite cerebral, but truly engaging story as the characters attempt to deal with what initially is pure mystery and later becomes a nightmare with no obvious way out. Because it's almost written as a period piece, the only point at which I felt it was let down by datedness was when Wyndham has a character suggest that there was little evidence for human evolution to our current form: even without DNA evidence, there was plenty of science on the matter already available by the 1950s.

One thing the book did for me was to inspire all sorts of thoughts about how the situation would be different now. One obvious aspect is that there are two house fires that kill people during the Dayout - because heating was largely based on open fires at the time. But the most dramatic difference was the ease with which what was happening was kept secret - something that's hard to imagine with modern communications and social media. I haven't seen the TV show, which has brought the setting forward to the present (and, from a publicity still, misses the whole point of the Children's partially non-individual nature because they all look very different from each other) - in doing so, I can't help but feel it will have lost much of the charm and fascination of the original.

Some classics (whether in science fiction or literature in general) prove distinctly feeble to a modern reader. I'm pleased to say this wasn't the case with The Midwich Cuckoos.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more