Skip to main content

Target Earth – Govert Schilling *****

I was biased in favour of this great little book even before I started to read it, simply because it’s so short. I’m sure that a lot of people who buy popular science books just want an overview and taster of a subject that’s brand new to them – and that’s likely to work best if the author keeps it short and to the point. Of course, you may want to dig deeper in areas that really interest you, but that’s what Google is for.

That basic principle aside, I’m still in awe at how much substance Govert Schilling has managed to cram into this tiny book. It’s essentially about all the things (natural things, I mean, not UFOs or space junk) that can end up on Earth after coming down from outer space. That ranges from the microscopically small particles of cosmic dust that accumulate in our gutters, all the way up to the ten kilometre wide asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs. Between these extremes are two topics that we’ve reviewed entire books about recently: meteorites (The Meteorite Hunters) and ‘city-killer’ asteroids (How to Kill an Asteroid). Schilling’s book is little more than half the length of either of those, yet he still manages to include entertaining, information-packed introductions to both topics.

Another thing I have to confess is that, although I’ve often written about this subject myself, I still learned quite a few new things from this book. For example, it’s not really true to say (as I’m afraid I have done, in the past) that a meteor trail is caused by an inbound meteoroid ‘burning up’ in the atmosphere. Actually the meteoroid evaporates rather than burns, and the glowing trail is caused by excited gas molecules in the air, not the meteoroid itself. These may sound like minor points, but they get the science right – as popular science writing ought to – rather than mangling it into a more easily digestible but not-quite-correct form.

The media, or at any rate the tabloids, never tire of trying to scare us out of our wits with dire warnings about some new asteroid threat or another. But the truth is there’s almost never any serious cause for alarm – perhaps not so surprising, given that in the whole of human history the total number of confirmed fatalities caused by meteorite impact is exactly one (the victim being an Iraqi man in August 1888 – another fact I didn’t previously know). The real importance of asteroids (which is what they’re called when they’re observed in space) and meteorites (the debris that remains after falling to Earth) lies not in any supposed threat they pose, but in what they can teach us about the universe we live in. 

That’s why serious books on such topics are so important, if only as an antidote to tabloid hysteria. And if all you want is a short but fascinating and wide-ranging primer, then look no further than this book.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support our online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Andrew May - See all reviews and Brian's online articles or subscribe free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...