The Secret World of Flexagons - Scott Sherman, Yossi Elran and Ann Schwartz ***

A great book for the right audience. When I was a teenager I loved Martin Gardner's Mathematical Puzzles and Diversions books. They combined mathematical oddities, such as there being more than one size of infinity, with numerical tricks and some physical maths-based objects, most notably flexagons. As someone who is physically inept, I never got much beyond a basic hexaflexagon, but these paper-based three dimensional structures that could change shape when manipulated, a bit like more sophisticated versions of paper fortune tellers, were fascinating.

Now we have a chunky, large format title exploring flexagons in far more depth. The first part of the book takes us into different flexagon structures and the range of possibilities enabling flexing. Some of these require quite sophisticated manipulation of the paper structure (which I did struggle with somewhat, being clumsy). Each flexagon type comes with a flat template to reproduce. These are sometimes quite small and for me benefited from blowing up a bit to make them more practical to manipulate, though many are reproduced larger later in the book.

Having got past the basics, the authors introduce more and more complex flexes (who is for a Möbius flip flex?), before exploring the culture that has built up around flexagons, such as naming conventions and 'pinch state diagrams', which use network diagrams to show how the different transformations are linked. We also get an exploration of the relationship between flexagons and group theory, some maths theory specifically built around flexagons, and the links between flexagons and topology. The final section, 'fun with flexagons' looks at combining flexagon structures with art work to give a more impressive visual impact.

This book will be hugely appealing if this is your thing. I'm giving it three stars, which my rating system describes as 'good solid book, worth reading if you are interested in the topic', not to say that it's a mid-ranking book, but rather that I suspect there are many popular science/maths readers it won't appeal to. I confess I did lose my interest in much of recreational maths as I got older, but if you find the concepts here get you excited, you absolutely need this book.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support our online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all reviews and Brian's online articles or subscribe free here

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog