The Secret World of Flexagons - Scott Sherman, Yossi Elran and Ann Schwartz ***

A great book for the right audience. When I was a teenager I loved Martin Gardner's Mathematical Puzzles and Diversions books. They combined mathematical oddities, such as there being more than one size of infinity, with numerical tricks and some physical maths-based objects, most notably flexagons. As someone who is physically inept, I never got much beyond a basic hexaflexagon, but these paper-based three dimensional structures that could change shape when manipulated, a bit like more sophisticated versions of paper fortune tellers, were fascinating.

Now we have a chunky, large format title exploring flexagons in far more depth. The first part of the book takes us into different flexagon structures and the range of possibilities enabling flexing. Some of these require quite sophisticated manipulation of the paper structure (which I did struggle with somewhat, being clumsy). Each flexagon type comes with a flat template to reproduce. These are sometimes quite small and for me benefited from blowing up a bit to make them more practical to manipulate, though many are reproduced larger later in the book.

Having got past the basics, the authors introduce more and more complex flexes (who is for a Möbius flip flex?), before exploring the culture that has built up around flexagons, such as naming conventions and 'pinch state diagrams', which use network diagrams to show how the different transformations are linked. We also get an exploration of the relationship between flexagons and group theory, some maths theory specifically built around flexagons, and the links between flexagons and topology. The final section, 'fun with flexagons' looks at combining flexagon structures with art work to give a more impressive visual impact.

This book will be hugely appealing if this is your thing. I'm giving it three stars, which my rating system describes as 'good solid book, worth reading if you are interested in the topic', not to say that it's a mid-ranking book, but rather that I suspect there are many popular science/maths readers it won't appeal to. I confess I did lose my interest in much of recreational maths as I got older, but if you find the concepts here get you excited, you absolutely need this book.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support our online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all reviews and Brian's online articles or subscribe free here

Comments

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here. We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...

Search This Blog