Skip to main content

Authors - W

A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z

Frans de Waal

Peter Wadhams

John Waller

Ian Walmsley

Benjamin Wardhaugh

A. E. Warren

Ian Watson

James Watson

Nigel Watson

Stephen Webb

Gavin Weightman

Steven Weinberg

David Weintraub

Andy Weir

Michael Welland

Wellcome (Mosaic Science)

Gary Wenk

John Wenz

Brad Wetzler

David Whitehouse

Catherine Whitlock (with Nicola Temple)

Tom Whyntie (with Oliver Pugh)

Norbert Wiener

Marjorie Wieseman

Frank Wilczek

Stephen Wilk

Maurice Wilkins

Matt Wilkinson

Yorick Wilks

Anthony Williams (with Don Tapscott)

J. B. Williams

Mark Williams (with Jan Zalasiewicz)

Paul Williams

Victoria Williamson

Jon Willis

Christopher Wills

Edward Wilson

Edward Wilson (with Bert Holldobler)

Robin Wilson

Ian Wilmut (with Roger Highfield)

Davey Winder

Nick Clark Windo

Laurie Winkless

Emily Winterburn

Richard Wiseman

Peter Woit

Maryanne Wolf

Gene Wolfe

Stephen Wolfram

  • Adventures of a Computational Explorer ***

    • Robert Wolke

    Comments

    Post a comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    Patricia Fara - Four Way Interview

    Patricia Fara lectures in the history of science at Cambridge University, where she is a Fellow of Clare College. She was the President of the British Society for the History of Science (2016-18) and her prize-winning book, Science: A Four Thousand Year History (OUP, 2009), has been translated into nine languages. An experienced public lecturer, Patricia Fara appears regularly in TV documentaries and radio programmes. She also contributes articles and reviews to many popular magazines and journals, including History Today, BBC History, New Scientist, Nature and the Times Literary Supplement. Her new book is Erasmus Darwin.

    Why history of science?
    I read physics at university, but half-way through the course I realised that had been a big mistake. Although I relished the intellectual challenge, I was bored by the long hours spent lining up recalcitrant instruments in dusty laboratories. Why was nobody encouraging us to think about the big questions – What is gravity? Does quantum mechani…
    Post a comment
    Read more

    The Idea of the Brain: Matthew Cobb *****

    Matthew Cobb is one of those people that you can’t help but admire but also secretly hate just a little bit for being so awesome. He is professor for zoology at the University of Manchester with a sizable teaching load that he apparently masters with consummate skill. He’s a scientific researcher, who researches the sense of smell of fruit fly maggots; I kid you not!  He’s also an attentive and loving family father but he still finds time and energy to write brilliant history of science books, three to date. His first, The Egg and Sperm Race, describes the search for the secret of human reproduction in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and is one of my favourite history of science books, on the period. His second, Life’s Greatest Secret is a monster, both in scope and detail, description of the hunt to decipher the structure and function of DNA that along the way demolishes a whole boatload of modern history of science myths. The most recent, and the subject of this review, is …
    Post a comment
    Read more

    The Search for Life on Mars - Elizabeth Howell and Nicholas Booth ***

    From the book’s enticing subtitle, ‘The Greatest Scientific Detective Story of All Time’, I was expecting something rather different. I thought the authors would kick off by introducing the suspects (the various forms life might take on Mars, either now or in the past) and the kind of telltale traces they might leave, followed by a chronological account of the detectives (i.e. scientists) searching for those traces, ruling out certain suspects and focusing on others, turning up unexpected new clues, and so on. But the book is nothing like that. Continuing with the fiction analogy, this isn’t a novel so much as a collection of short stories – eleven self-contained chapters, each with its own set of protagonists, suspects and clues.

    Some of the chapters work better than others. I found the first three – which despite their early placement cover NASA’s most recent Mars missions – the most irritating. For one thing, they unfold in a way that’s at odds with the cerebral ‘detective story’ na…
    Post a comment
    Read more