Skip to main content

Authors - W

A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z

Frans de Waal

Peter Wadhams

John Waller

Ian Walmsley

Benjamin Wardhaugh

A. E. Warren

Ian Watson

James Watson

Nigel Watson

Stephen Webb

Gavin Weightman

Steven Weinberg

Kelly and Zach Weinersmith

  • A City on Mars: can we settle space, should we settle space, and have we really thought this through? ****

    • David Weintraub

    Andy Weir

    Michael Welland

    Wellcome (Mosaic Science)

    H. G. Wells

  • The World Set Free (SF) ***
  • World Brain (SF)  ***

    • Gary Wenk

    John Wenz

    Brad Wetzler

    David Whitehouse

    Catherine Whitlock (with Nicola Temple)

    Tom Whyntie (with Oliver Pugh)

    Norbert Wiener

    Marjorie Wieseman

    Frank Wilczek

    Sarah Wild

    Stephen Wilk

    Maurice Wilkins

    Matt Wilkinson

    Yorick Wilks

  • Artificial Intelligence: modern magic or dangerous future? ****

    • Clifford Will (with Nicolas Yunes)

    Anthony Williams (with Don Tapscott)

    J. B. Williams

    Mark Williams (with Jan Zalasiewicz)

    Paul Williams

    Sheila Williams

    Victoria Williamson

    Connie Willis

    Deborah Willis

    Jon Willis

    Christopher Wills

    Edward Wilson

    Edward Wilson (with Bert Holldobler)

    Robin Wilson

    Ian Wilmut (with Roger Highfield)

    Davey Winder

    Nick Clark Windo

    Laurie Winkless

    Emily Winterburn

    Richard Wiseman

    Peter Woit

    Maryanne Wolf

    Gene Wolfe

    Stephen Wolfram

  • Adventures of a Computational Explorer ***

    • Robert Wolke

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

    This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

    In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

    In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more