The problem with this approach, for me, is illustrated by the best story (as a pure story) in the collection, G. K. Chesterton's The Tremendous Adventures of Major Brown, which first appeared in 1903. This is part of Chesterton's entertaining 'Club of Queer Trades' series of stories, using a Sherlock Holmes-ish approach, where each story is related to investigating someone employing a one-off and unusual way of making money. It's an enjoyable story with Chesterton's usual flair. But I seriously doubt the assertion that it 'delves into augmented, virtual and mixed reality technologies.' What it actually is based on is a company that presents customers with live adventure experiences - no technology required.
This approach of pinning a modern technology to a historical conception that vaguely resembles it is reminiscent of books that suggest, say, that an event in the Bible was an account of an alien abduction. To be fair to Webb, not all the parallels are quite so laboured. The closest to having a genuine feel of science and technology predicted is Edward Bellamy's 1898 story With the Eyes Shut, which genuinely does present a set of future technologies (that have somehow become commonplace in the story without the narrator realising, for reasons that aren't explained). This prefigures everything from talking books to mobile phones. (Oddly, Webb's main 'modern science' bit from this one is 'the future of science publishing'.) However, many stories merely feature tiny references, often based on what feels like magic rather than science to act as a starting point for discuss modern science or technology. So, for example, Edward Sabin's supposedly humourous 1902 story The Supersensitive Golf Ball describes a magic golf ball that only does well if the player doesn't swear at it. We are told this features 'machine learning and AI' - it really doesn't.
Most of the stories are painfully slow and laboured. Unfortunately, because these tedious tales take up most of the space, Webb only has room for a couple of pages each on the science or technology, which inevitably feels superficial - and given the frailty of most of the connections, it's hard to take much interest in it. It doesn't help that even the most scientific-sounding of the stories can rapidly descend into fantasy. Miles Breuer's 1930 The Gostak and the Doshes makes a big thing of explaining Minkowskian spacetime, only to both have the scientist dismiss Einstein ('Why should the speed of light be fixed?' - a question that shows the author had zero understanding of the science) and to then envisage a mental means of undergoing a highly unlikely dimensional translation.
A final moan - I've had to look up all those dates above. The book, bizarrely, doesn't say when the stories date from, which would have been very useful to give the reader context. There's a good idea in here struggling to get out - but the chosen stories don't deliver, while the science coverage is far too much of an overview. Our reviewer much preferred Webb's earlier book, All the Wonder that Would Be which is more about the perhaps easier job of identifying the differences between science fiction's future science and reality.
Paperback:   |
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Comments
Post a Comment