Skip to main content

Visions of Tomorrow - Stephen Webb ***

This wasn't the book I expected it to be from the subtitle 'exploring classic Sci-Fi stories through the lens of modern science'. For me, to be 'classic' something has to be both relatively old and high quality. Without the quality part, 'dated' might be a better word - and that's primarily what we get here. I had the same problem with the recent book Classic Science Fiction Stories, so I can't really blame Stephen Webb, but I had in mind a kind of 'science of' book for Golden Age SF. Instead we get end of the nineteenth/early twentieth century proto-SF, often with very little science to be 'science of' with.

The problem with this approach, for me, is illustrated by the best story (as a pure story) in the collection, G. K. Chesterton's The Tremendous Adventures of Major Brown, which first appeared in 1903. This is part of Chesterton's entertaining 'Club of Queer Trades' series of stories, using a Sherlock Holmes-ish approach, where each story is related to investigating someone employing a one-off and unusual way of making money. It's an enjoyable story with Chesterton's usual flair. But I seriously doubt the assertion that it 'delves into augmented, virtual and mixed reality technologies.' What it actually is based on is a company that presents customers with live adventure experiences - no technology required.

This approach of pinning a modern technology to a historical conception that vaguely resembles it is reminiscent of books that suggest, say, that an event in the Bible was an account of an alien abduction. To be fair to Webb, not all the parallels are quite so laboured. The closest to having a genuine feel of science and technology predicted is Edward Bellamy's 1898 story With the Eyes Shut, which genuinely does present a set of future technologies (that have somehow become commonplace in the story without the narrator realising, for reasons that aren't explained). This prefigures everything from talking books to mobile phones. (Oddly, Webb's main 'modern science' bit from this one is 'the future of science publishing'.) However, many stories merely feature tiny references, often based on what feels like magic rather than science to act as a starting point for discuss modern science or technology. So, for example,  Edward Sabin's supposedly humourous 1902 story The Supersensitive Golf Ball describes a magic golf ball that only does well if the player doesn't swear at it. We are told this features 'machine learning and AI' - it really doesn't.

Most of the stories are painfully slow and laboured. Unfortunately, because these tedious tales take up most of the space, Webb only has room for a couple of pages each on the science or technology, which inevitably feels superficial - and given the frailty of most of the connections, it's hard to take much interest in it. It doesn't help that even the most scientific-sounding of the stories can rapidly descend into fantasy. Miles Breuer's 1930 The Gostak and the Doshes makes a big thing of explaining Minkowskian spacetime, only to both have the scientist dismiss Einstein ('Why should the speed of light be fixed?' - a question that shows the author had zero understanding of the science) and to then envisage a mental means of undergoing a highly unlikely dimensional translation.

A final moan - I've had to look up all those dates above. The book, bizarrely, doesn't say when the stories date from, which would have been very useful to give the reader context. There's a good idea in here struggling to get out - but the chosen stories don't deliver, while the science coverage is far too much of an overview. Our reviewer much preferred Webb's earlier book, All the Wonder that Would Be which is more about the perhaps easier job of identifying the differences between science fiction's future science and reality.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more