Skip to main content

Joshua Howgego - Five Way Interview

Joshua Howgego is currently the Acting Head of Features at New Scientist magazine. He’s been on staff at the magazine for nine years and before that completed a PhD in chemistry. His first book is The Meteorite Hunters. 

Why meteorites?

Years ago I was at a scientific conference and I heard meteorites described as time capsules from the birth of the solar system. I realised that, although we usually use telescopes to study space, these extraterrestrial stones provide another unique way of doing so. I found that prompted a lot of questions for me, including 'how on Earth do you find a meteorite?' and 'how do you read the secrets inside them?' It was these questions that led me to write my book.

Why this book?

As a magazine feature editor, I’m interested in how stories are told and how a good narrative is structured. What appealed to me about hunting meteorites is that presents a ready-made narrative: you have a person setting out on a quest to find incredible treasure! I thought I could see a way to tell these adventure stories, weave in some science, and so produce a book the like of which no one else had quite done before.

Are meteorite hunters the Indiana Joneses of the science world?

Definitely – forget archaeologists, it’s all about meteorite hunters! I mean, I am being facetious here. But there are certainly some incredible escapades in the book, with people hunting the lost meteorites of Antarctica, searching for stardust across the rooftops of Oslo, scouring remote deserts. I didn’t meet anyone that carries a whip – but a magnetic walking stick is the next best thing, right?

What’s next?

The last chapter of my book is all about sample-return missions, in other words, space missions that visit asteroids, burgle a sample, and bring it back to Earth. There has been a handful of these over the past decade or so and they give us another unique window on the early solar system. One thing that would be a next step would be a sample-return mission that would bring back a piece of the frozen core of a comet. We’ve never done this before and it would require us to build a sort of bullet proof solar-powered space freezer to bring the sample back. Noone knows how to do that yet, but scientists are looking into it now.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

This year is, by one reasonable estimation, the 100th anniversary of the birth of quantum mechanics, so I’m looking forward to editing some stories for New Scientist exploring that. I am fascinated by what quantum mechanics is trying to tell us about the deep workings of reality. When it comes to meteorites, though, I am excited to see how one particular adventure pans out: the quest to find the legendary Chinguetti meteorite. It was supposedly found by a French army captain more than a century ago in the desert of Mauritania and it was vast: 40 metres wide by 100 long. This would make it easily the largest known meteorite – but it has never been found again. I wrote in the book about a new effort to find it, and if that is successful (a big if) it will be thrilling.

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Interview by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...
Post a Comment
Read more

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...
Post a Comment
Read more