Skip to main content

Joshua Howgego - Five Way Interview

Joshua Howgego is currently the Acting Head of Features at New Scientist magazine. He’s been on staff at the magazine for nine years and before that completed a PhD in chemistry. His first book is The Meteorite Hunters. 

Why meteorites?

Years ago I was at a scientific conference and I heard meteorites described as time capsules from the birth of the solar system. I realised that, although we usually use telescopes to study space, these extraterrestrial stones provide another unique way of doing so. I found that prompted a lot of questions for me, including 'how on Earth do you find a meteorite?' and 'how do you read the secrets inside them?' It was these questions that led me to write my book.

Why this book?

As a magazine feature editor, I’m interested in how stories are told and how a good narrative is structured. What appealed to me about hunting meteorites is that presents a ready-made narrative: you have a person setting out on a quest to find incredible treasure! I thought I could see a way to tell these adventure stories, weave in some science, and so produce a book the like of which no one else had quite done before.

Are meteorite hunters the Indiana Joneses of the science world?

Definitely – forget archaeologists, it’s all about meteorite hunters! I mean, I am being facetious here. But there are certainly some incredible escapades in the book, with people hunting the lost meteorites of Antarctica, searching for stardust across the rooftops of Oslo, scouring remote deserts. I didn’t meet anyone that carries a whip – but a magnetic walking stick is the next best thing, right?

What’s next?

The last chapter of my book is all about sample-return missions, in other words, space missions that visit asteroids, burgle a sample, and bring it back to Earth. There has been a handful of these over the past decade or so and they give us another unique window on the early solar system. One thing that would be a next step would be a sample-return mission that would bring back a piece of the frozen core of a comet. We’ve never done this before and it would require us to build a sort of bullet proof solar-powered space freezer to bring the sample back. Noone knows how to do that yet, but scientists are looking into it now.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

This year is, by one reasonable estimation, the 100th anniversary of the birth of quantum mechanics, so I’m looking forward to editing some stories for New Scientist exploring that. I am fascinated by what quantum mechanics is trying to tell us about the deep workings of reality. When it comes to meteorites, though, I am excited to see how one particular adventure pans out: the quest to find the legendary Chinguetti meteorite. It was supposedly found by a French army captain more than a century ago in the desert of Mauritania and it was vast: 40 metres wide by 100 long. This would make it easily the largest known meteorite – but it has never been found again. I wrote in the book about a new effort to find it, and if that is successful (a big if) it will be thrilling.

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Interview by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more