Skip to main content

Joshua Howgego - Five Way Interview

Joshua Howgego is currently the Acting Head of Features at New Scientist magazine. He’s been on staff at the magazine for nine years and before that completed a PhD in chemistry. His first book is The Meteorite Hunters. 

Why meteorites?

Years ago I was at a scientific conference and I heard meteorites described as time capsules from the birth of the solar system. I realised that, although we usually use telescopes to study space, these extraterrestrial stones provide another unique way of doing so. I found that prompted a lot of questions for me, including 'how on Earth do you find a meteorite?' and 'how do you read the secrets inside them?' It was these questions that led me to write my book.

Why this book?

As a magazine feature editor, I’m interested in how stories are told and how a good narrative is structured. What appealed to me about hunting meteorites is that presents a ready-made narrative: you have a person setting out on a quest to find incredible treasure! I thought I could see a way to tell these adventure stories, weave in some science, and so produce a book the like of which no one else had quite done before.

Are meteorite hunters the Indiana Joneses of the science world?

Definitely – forget archaeologists, it’s all about meteorite hunters! I mean, I am being facetious here. But there are certainly some incredible escapades in the book, with people hunting the lost meteorites of Antarctica, searching for stardust across the rooftops of Oslo, scouring remote deserts. I didn’t meet anyone that carries a whip – but a magnetic walking stick is the next best thing, right?

What’s next?

The last chapter of my book is all about sample-return missions, in other words, space missions that visit asteroids, burgle a sample, and bring it back to Earth. There has been a handful of these over the past decade or so and they give us another unique window on the early solar system. One thing that would be a next step would be a sample-return mission that would bring back a piece of the frozen core of a comet. We’ve never done this before and it would require us to build a sort of bullet proof solar-powered space freezer to bring the sample back. Noone knows how to do that yet, but scientists are looking into it now.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

This year is, by one reasonable estimation, the 100th anniversary of the birth of quantum mechanics, so I’m looking forward to editing some stories for New Scientist exploring that. I am fascinated by what quantum mechanics is trying to tell us about the deep workings of reality. When it comes to meteorites, though, I am excited to see how one particular adventure pans out: the quest to find the legendary Chinguetti meteorite. It was supposedly found by a French army captain more than a century ago in the desert of Mauritania and it was vast: 40 metres wide by 100 long. This would make it easily the largest known meteorite – but it has never been found again. I wrote in the book about a new effort to find it, and if that is successful (a big if) it will be thrilling.

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Interview by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who Invented the Computer? – Ian Watson

Ian Watson is the author of  The Universal Machine  and featured in a recent  Four Way Interview . Saturday June 23 2012 was the centenary of the birth of Alan Turing, the troubled genius who invented the modern computer. Why though do so few people recognize his name and his great achievements? In 1936 English mathematician Alan Turing, published a paper,  On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem . This became the foundation of computing. In it Turing presented a theoretical machine that could solve any problem that could be described by instructions encoded on a paper tape. A Turing Machine could calculate square roots, whilst another might solve Sudoku puzzles. Turing demonstrated you could construct a single  Universal Machine  that could simulate any Turing Machine. One machine solving any problem for which a program could be written – sound familiar? He’d invented the computer. Then,  computers  were peop...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Star Book – Peter Grego ****

This attractive landscape format book combines an excellent introduction to the stars and basic astronomy with a set of star maps, plus in depth looks at some of the stars featured, with a  bonus section on the solar system. Amazon says it’s a hardback, but in fact it’s a paperback with a rather ingenious cover – you can’t tell from the photo, but the words ‘The Star Book’ are punched through as a series of holes that show the white paper of the next page beneath. Like many astronomy/space books, the cover lacks shelf appeal because it is mostly black, but at least there is some original thought here. Unlike many books in this format which tend to concentrate on the pictures, there is a good deal of excellent text by Peter Grego, so there was no feeling that you were only getting the star maps and star ‘biographies’, something these days much more suited to an iPad or smartphone app. Instead, the opening 30 or so pages give a very good introduction that would be valuable to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ignorance: How it drives science – Stuart Firestein *****

This is a delightful little book that really gets you thinking. I stress the ‘little’ part not as a negative, but as a good thing. There is nothing worse than fat, bloated popular science books where the author feels they have to get 120,000 words to be taken seriously. This is the sort of book that can be read in a couple of hours – but you will get so much more out of it than one of those tedious doorstops. The premise underlying the book is in once sense extremely simple, yet is fundamental to an understanding of what science is and what scientists do. And it is an understanding that is totally at odds with the typical way science is portrayed both in university lectures and popular science books. As Stuart Firestein points out, what is important is not the facts, but rather the area of ignorance. The interesting part and the fundamental heart of science is not about what we know, but about what we don’t know and where we want to look next. Take this lovely quote: ‘Working ...
Post a Comment
Read more