Skip to main content

Classic Science Fiction Stories - Adam Roberts (Ed.) ***(*)

There are many interpretations of the word 'classic' - in the context of science fiction many would assume this referred to the 'golden age' of the 40s and 50s, but Adam Roberts (who knows his stuff) has plumped for what might otherwise be regarded as proto-SF - science fiction-like stories that predate the concept. The earliest here is Micromégas by Voltaire from 1752 and the latest Stanley Weinbaum's 1934 A Martian Odyssey.

Before we go any further, I ought to mention the physical book itself - when it arrived I felt a bit like someone who buys dolls' house furniture thinking it's the real thing. It looks like a big grown up book in its picture, but in reality it's tiny, less than 16cm in height. Admittedly not doll friendly, but uncomfortably small to hold (though it does fit in most pockets).

I really want to give it both three stars and five stars, so the final outcome is something in between. As someone with an interest in the history of science fiction, it's fascinating to be able to read something like Micromégas, which I have heard of many times but never actually seen. But as a reader of science fiction, practically everything pre-twentieth century in the book is somewhere on the scale between tedious and downright sleep-inducing. I have really enjoyed many of the short stories of H. G. Wells in the past, but the one that opens the book, The Star from 1897, is surely one of his least readable.

Standouts on still being passable stories for the reader include A Martian Odyssey, which portrays impressively alien aliens, while other indigestible yet fascinating contributions include Mary Shelley's The Mortal Immortal from 1833. I enjoyed Poe's 1844 story A Tale of the Ragged Mountains (though it felt more like fantasy than SF to me). Two more I'd pick out are Florence McLandburgh's 1876 The Automaton Ear and H. P. Lovecraft's 1927 The Colour out of Space. Both would have worked a lot better at half the length, but each had interesting ideas, despite stretching the science of the day to its limit. McLandburgh, with the idea that all sounds ever produced could be picked up (rather like an audio version of James Blish's Beep where all instantaneous transmissions throughout time are available in a single burst), seemed unaware of the dispersal of sound energy (and the impossibility of tuning in to a single historical sound).

In Lovecraft's better-known story, the idea of seeing a colour beyond human experience seemed to imply a misunderstanding of what colour is. Of course there can be colours we can't see - so in a sense there are novel colours... but the whole point is we can't see them. It was great to read this story, though, as I'd heard so much about Lovecraft without ever reading any of his work because I'd always mentally classified it as horror rather than SF. My only disappointment was it took 31 pages before we reached his trademark adjective, eldritch.

The inclusion of these stories made me think a little about the borderline between fantasy and science fiction. A story can still be science fiction if it gets the science a bit wrong, but if the scientific content doesn't make any sense at all it becomes fantasy. It's easy to see this distinction in superhero films. For example, while the origin story of Spider-Man is pure fantasy, there is quite a lot of bad science that could still be considered SF in his actions (for example, stopping a train with his web and body). But Superman is pure fantasy, with not a hint of scientific basis. McLandburgh probably slips in with the bad science proviso, but for me, although the Lovecraft story implies aliens, its detail tips it into fantasy.

Whether or not you will enjoy this book depends how important SF history is to you. If you are happy to endure stories with the pace of a snail because they are foundational to the development of the genre, you will definitely want a copy. If you expect the enjoyment you would get from a science fiction short story collection dating from the 1950s or later, you may well be disappointed.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...