Hidden in the Heavens - Jason Steffen ****

This introduction to the relatively short-lasting Kepler space telescope's search for exoplanets from a researcher on the team opens with the now familiar (and, dare I say it, rather dull) image of people standing around celebrating a mission launch. This type of 'they're just people, folks' intro is supposed to make science more approachable, which made me concerned it would be one of those books that focuses mostly on 'what I did at work and the lovely people I worked with'. Thankfully, though, Jason Steffen, an associate professor of physics and long-term member of the science team on NASA's Kepler mission, keeps his focus mostly on the discoveries, rather than the warm fizzy wine.

We are taken through (perhaps in a bit too much detail) the design of the probe and related missions before settling down on the telescope's use: how planets orbiting other stars are detected and behave, and common but sometimes unfamiliar types of planet.

I very much liked the inclusion of some detail on the difficulty of dealing with binary star systems and other stellar oddities (a welcome addition as this isn't often mentioned in any detail in popular science books on this subject) and the inevitable speculation about habitability and what would contribute to a planet's environment. Steffen is honest about the dangers of subjectivity of detection on the part of observers (who, after all, want to find exoplanets) and the benefits of reducing human decision making in deciding exactly what has been observed.

This is a solid approach to the subject, pitched quite well for a popular science audience. Steffen's prose does the job in a workmanlike fashion. I found the subtitle both a spot irritating and misleading, as it seems to suggest the main focus is examining our own navels California-style in 'How the Kepler mission's quest for new planets changed how we view our own'. Thankfully this isn't the case, except to dedicate a few pages to the way discoveries so far suggest Earth to be relatively rare. I don't particularly want to be thinking about our neighbourhood when I'm finding out about exoplanets and how they are discovered. It smacks somewhat of 'it's all about me'. But that doesn't detract from a good, straightforward picture of the exoplanent quest.

Hardback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog