Skip to main content

Adventures of a Computational Explorer - Stephen Wolfram ***

Stephen Wolfram, the man behind the scientist's mathematical tool of choice, Mathematica, plus a whole host of other software products, including the uncanny Wolfram Alpha knowledge engine, is undoubtedly a genius of the first order. In this book, we get an uncensored excursion into the mind of genius - which is, without doubt, a fascinating prospect.

The book consists of a collection of essays and speeches that Wolfram has produced over the last ten to fifteen years, covering an eclectic range of topics. Like all such collections, the result is something that lacks the coherence of a book with a narrative that runs through it, inevitably introducing a degree of repetition and a mix of interesting and not-so-interesting topics - but there's likely to be something to catch the attention anyone who is into computing or mathematics.

One of the most interesting pieces is the opening one, where Wolfram describes being a consultant on the SF movie Arrival. He seems to have had a whole host of roles, from computing work with his son to producing a whiteboard full of 'real physics' to be shown in the background of a scene. This last item is familiarly bitter-sweet to anyone who has fallen for the siren song of helping out moviemakers, or TV and radio producers. Months after his contribution, Wolfram received an urgent request to provide a whiteboard for star Amy Adams to stand in front of. Wolfram clearly put a huge amount of thought into this, and explains in the book what the various elements on the board are about. But then we're told 'In the end, the whiteboard got re-written again for the final movie' - probably for no good reason.

Other pieces that particularly interested me included Wolfram's thoughts on attempts to communicate information to aliens, his efforts in creating algorithmic music (started because he wanted a unique ringtone on his phone), and one of several ventures into one of his favourite topics, cellular automata (think 'game of Life' if this means nothing to you) inspired by the decoration on Cambridge North railway station.

We also pick up quite a lot on Wolfram's past - this book would be an absolute goldmine for a Wolfram biographer. I must admit, I didn't even realise he was English rather than American, and his precocious journey through and out of academia is fascinating. Having said that, one or two autobiographical details of his privileged upbringing may raise an eyebrow. He comments 'Following British tradition I went to a so-called public school' (Eton). I'm not sure that something less than seven per cent of the population do could be called British tradition.

I'll be honest, I did find some of the essays boring. There was a lot about software development - I've worked in the field, but I don't really want to read about it for entertainment. And most bizarrely of all we get 48 pages detailing exactly how he organises his life, down to the way he arranges his files. Sometimes, also, it did feel very like promotional literature. It's unusual to go more than a couple of pages without a mention of a Wolfram product. And there's very heavy use made of something he calls the 'Principle of Computational Equivalence', which is brandished like a magic wand, but never justified.

In the end, the book does give genuine insights into the workings of a remarkable mind and an unusual individual. It's not all highly readable, but there is interesting material in here, making it well worth a peruse.
Paperback 

Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on