Skip to main content

Virtual Reality - Samuel Greengard ***

This is an entry in a new series of pocket-sized guides which take on subsets of what would be covered by a typical book (I'm looking forward to Recycling in the same series). It covers the genuinely interesting topic of virtual reality, but the way it does so shows a degree of exaggerated expectation. The technology is simply not up to the promise yet.

 Even Samuel Greengard acknowledges this when he writes 'Although virtual technologies have been around in one for or another for a few decades, the hype has mostly exceeded the reality.' Unfortunately, said hype is present through most of the book. Greengard tells us that we have experienced 'a massive wave of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality'. Not in my world, we haven't. I'm not anti VR, but I think any technology that involves strapping something on your face will always be niche. The maximum the mass market is likely to put up with is the inconvenience of glasses, though even those proved too much faff for 3D TV to succeed. It's okay for the occasional visit to the cinema, but not use every day.

 The book begins by spending the first chapter somewhat tediously defining virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality, then giving examples, only to spend much of the second chapter doing the same again. (Then, later in the book, we get yet more of lists of examples of what's to come.) The technology chapters give significantly more information, but tend to be lists of technologies with little narrative flow.

 I'd also say that the history is a little off as it implies that the first commercialisation of 3D pictures was Viewmaster, but 3D was a huge commercial technology in Victorian times (much more so than virtual reality is now). One other detailed moan - in his enthusiasm to give examples that normal people use, Greengard gives the example of banking apps on phones used to scan cheques, where he claims that putting a frame around the cheque when viewing it through the app is augmented reality. But if that's the case, the frames in camera viewfinders have been augmented reality for at least 100 years - stretching the definition to make an application seem more prevalent is not attractive. 

 Overall, I think the real position is summed up nicely when Greengard enthusiastically tells us that 'Gaming and entertainment are also taking on new and different forms. In 2016, for instance, a movie theater in Amsterdam became the world's first permanent VR movie cinema.' After explaining the experience he then has to throw in that 'the theater shuttered its doors in 2018.' That went well, then.

 I'm not anti-VR. I'm sure it has good, interesting, specialist applications already and will eventually become mass market beyond the likes of Pokemon Go when it can be done in a less intrusive way. But, for the moment, I would suggest that a good book on virtual reality should be clear about its shortcomings and realistic about timescales - and I don't think that happens here.
Paperback:  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Wish They'd Taught Me That - Robin Pemantle and Julian Gould ***

Subtitled 'overlooked and omitted topics in mathematics', the obvious concern is that there is a good reason these topics are overlooked and omitted. Thankfully, this is not the case, but it's fair to say that despite attempts to dress it up that way, this isn't a recreational maths book. There's a fair description in the blurb: 'the topics which every undergraduate mathematics student "should" know, but has probably never encountered... magnificent secrets that are beautiful, useful and accessible.' As someone who many years ago did a degree with a fair amount of mathematics in it, I think it probably would have appealed back then - though to be honest a lot of it has disappeared from my memory, strongly reducing the entertainment value. Here's an example. The first real page contains the sentence:  'If you are handed a real number 𝓍 ∈  ⁠ ⁠,  one way to tell if 𝓍 is rational or irrational is to look at sequences of rational numbers q n ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more