Doomsday Book (SF) - Connie Willis ***

Having enjoyed Connie Willis's collection of award winning stories, Time is the Fire, I thought I'd follow up with her 1992 novel (winner of both SF's major book awards). To be honest, I struggled with this one.

In my review of Time is the Fire I suggested a couple of the stories were unnecessary long - this doubly applies to Doomsday Book. It is so slow, there's a feeling it's going to come to an absolute stop any time soon. I know the topic is time travel, but this made time go very slowly indeed. Just one example - a character bursts into a pub with an important piece of information and collapses. We then get what feels like 100 pages of him not quite telling us what he wanted to say. In his excellent introduction (the best bit of the book) Adam Roberts says 'Doomsday Book is a long novel, and it starts slowly; but its length is not egregious.' Well, no, I suppose it's not - but it is distinctly painful.

I ought to mention that the underlying concept is excellent. The book is set in the 2050s where there are political shenanigans between different parts of the Oxford University history department. The goodies are 20th century historians, who are thoughtful and careful - contrasted with the careless medieval historians who send the heroine Kivrin back to the fourteenth century unprepared for what she will meet. The book then alternates between the 2050s and Kivrin's experiences.

Particular resonant now are the 'present day' scenes, which feature Oxford locking down after a virus outbreak - a process that has become standard since an earlier pandemic. Meanwhile, as Roberts points out, while Willis doesn't play with the mind-bending aspects of time travel (and gets a fair number of historical details wrong), she nonetheless does an excellent job of exposing us with Kivrin to the less than jolly aspects of life and death in the thirteenth century. It's just done at a glacial pace.

One strange aspect is Willis's portrayal of 2050s Oxford. Bizarrely, someone is bought a Christmas present of a 'muffler' - a word that was already antiquated when the novel came out. In fact, Willis's 2050s social setting feels far more like the 1930s than 60 years ahead of when it was written. Almost everyone is very formal and stiff. The dialogue and general social attitudes could come straight out of, say, C. S. Lewis's 1938 Out of the Silent Planet. This just feels very odd.

All in all, while the concept was great, I couldn't get on with the way this book was written - it was a disappointment.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

Search This Blog