Doomsday Book (SF) - Connie Willis ***

Having enjoyed Connie Willis's collection of award winning stories, Time is the Fire, I thought I'd follow up with her 1992 novel (winner of both SF's major book awards). To be honest, I struggled with this one.

In my review of Time is the Fire I suggested a couple of the stories were unnecessary long - this doubly applies to Doomsday Book. It is so slow, there's a feeling it's going to come to an absolute stop any time soon. I know the topic is time travel, but this made time go very slowly indeed. Just one example - a character bursts into a pub with an important piece of information and collapses. We then get what feels like 100 pages of him not quite telling us what he wanted to say. In his excellent introduction (the best bit of the book) Adam Roberts says 'Doomsday Book is a long novel, and it starts slowly; but its length is not egregious.' Well, no, I suppose it's not - but it is distinctly painful.

I ought to mention that the underlying concept is excellent. The book is set in the 2050s where there are political shenanigans between different parts of the Oxford University history department. The goodies are 20th century historians, who are thoughtful and careful - contrasted with the careless medieval historians who send the heroine Kivrin back to the fourteenth century unprepared for what she will meet. The book then alternates between the 2050s and Kivrin's experiences.

Particular resonant now are the 'present day' scenes, which feature Oxford locking down after a virus outbreak - a process that has become standard since an earlier pandemic. Meanwhile, as Roberts points out, while Willis doesn't play with the mind-bending aspects of time travel (and gets a fair number of historical details wrong), she nonetheless does an excellent job of exposing us with Kivrin to the less than jolly aspects of life and death in the thirteenth century. It's just done at a glacial pace.

One strange aspect is Willis's portrayal of 2050s Oxford. Bizarrely, someone is bought a Christmas present of a 'muffler' - a word that was already antiquated when the novel came out. In fact, Willis's 2050s social setting feels far more like the 1930s than 60 years ahead of when it was written. Almost everyone is very formal and stiff. The dialogue and general social attitudes could come straight out of, say, C. S. Lewis's 1938 Out of the Silent Planet. This just feels very odd.

All in all, while the concept was great, I couldn't get on with the way this book was written - it was a disappointment.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here. We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...

Search This Blog