Skip to main content

Time is the Fire (SF) - Connie Willis *****

I've been reading science fiction since the 1960s, but I can still come across a writer that's new to me who has been in the business for decades - and that happened recently with Connie Willis' Time is the Fire. This remarkable collection is of stories, published between the 70s and the 90s, that have all won either Hugos or Nebulas - the big US awards for SF writing. I suspect one reason they are new to me is that they are all from US science fiction magazines, which I've never regularly read.

There's certainly plenty of quality in this collection. Willis is a brilliant storyteller in the gentle narrative style, giving us stories that are strongly imbued with either humour or longing and sadness. If you haven't come across her writing, Ray Bradbury most directly came to mind as a parallel, though here the folksiness is joined by an enthusiasm for some non-US settings, notably in London, St Paul's Cathedral and the Underground. To pick out a few favourites, we kick off with A Letter from the Clearys, which delivers a punch to the gut with a very small scale view of a post-apocalyptic America.

Fire Watch is a great time travel story set in London during the Blitz, which has a poignant twist. (With a typical Willis touch of humour, the time traveller has spent years research St Paul before his trip, only to discover that he is actually to visit St Paul's.) Despite the moan below, I loved the way All Seated on the Ground pulled together an alien visit and choirs. And although it faces the usual problems of near-future SF writing, Willis's circa 2008-set The Last of the Winnebagos brilliantly intertwines environmental decline (including the extinction of dogs) with RVs being rendered illegal and the way two people's lives have been changed by an accident in the past involving a dog. The technology (and, thankfully, the state of the world) is all wrong - but just as this doesn't really matter with Blade Runner's ludicrous portrayal of 2019, it's also not a problem here.

I admit there are a couple of stories that don't seem to reach the heights the awards they received suggest. Death on the Nile is a great story, but it's fantasy, not SF (as is The Winds of Marble Arch). At the Rialto is less successful: its humour is very heavy handed, while its setting verges on the ludicrous. (Heavy-handed humour is also a bit of problem in the pseudo-academic paper The Soul Selects her own Society - though the premise, linking Emily Dickinson and the world of H. G. Wells's War of the Worlds is brilliant.) At the Rialto is supposed to feature a conference for quantum physicists, but the topics discussed are at the most basic popular science level. It's just inconceivable that quantum physicists in the 1980s would be shocked and confused as they appear to be by, for example, tunnelling. The response to this one on both its humour and its science was to groan.

My only other complaint is that a couple of the stories - The Winds of Marble Arch and All Seated on the Ground are too long. It may be the cynic in me, but given stories are paid by the word I do wonder if this had something to do with how lengthy they are. It's not that they're bad stories. All Seated on the Ground particularly takes an absolutely brilliant (and light-hearted) approach to dealing with the problems of communicating with aliens. But both these stories feature an obsessive trying many different variations on theme to try to work something out, and after a while they get a touch repetitive.

However, the majority of the stories were excellent - and I don't think I've ever read a collection that was uniformly brilliant. The short story is a format where science fiction writers excel - and Willis shows why. Her style a cross between Bradbury and Aldiss, with the former’s lyricism and poignancy, and the latter’s sharpness. 

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are
Post a Comment
Read more

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re
Post a Comment
Read more