Skip to main content

Time is the Fire (SF) - Connie Willis *****

I've been reading science fiction since the 1960s, but I can still come across a writer that's new to me who has been in the business for decades - and that happened recently with Connie Willis' Time is the Fire. This remarkable collection is of stories, published between the 70s and the 90s, that have all won either Hugos or Nebulas - the big US awards for SF writing. I suspect one reason they are new to me is that they are all from US science fiction magazines, which I've never regularly read.

There's certainly plenty of quality in this collection. Willis is a brilliant storyteller in the gentle narrative style, giving us stories that are strongly imbued with either humour or longing and sadness. If you haven't come across her writing, Ray Bradbury most directly came to mind as a parallel, though here the folksiness is joined by an enthusiasm for some non-US settings, notably in London, St Paul's Cathedral and the Underground. To pick out a few favourites, we kick off with A Letter from the Clearys, which delivers a punch to the gut with a very small scale view of a post-apocalyptic America.

Fire Watch is a great time travel story set in London during the Blitz, which has a poignant twist. (With a typical Willis touch of humour, the time traveller has spent years research St Paul before his trip, only to discover that he is actually to visit St Paul's.) Despite the moan below, I loved the way All Seated on the Ground pulled together an alien visit and choirs. And although it faces the usual problems of near-future SF writing, Willis's circa 2008-set The Last of the Winnebagos brilliantly intertwines environmental decline (including the extinction of dogs) with RVs being rendered illegal and the way two people's lives have been changed by an accident in the past involving a dog. The technology (and, thankfully, the state of the world) is all wrong - but just as this doesn't really matter with Blade Runner's ludicrous portrayal of 2019, it's also not a problem here.

I admit there are a couple of stories that don't seem to reach the heights the awards they received suggest. Death on the Nile is a great story, but it's fantasy, not SF (as is The Winds of Marble Arch). At the Rialto is less successful: its humour is very heavy handed, while its setting verges on the ludicrous. (Heavy-handed humour is also a bit of problem in the pseudo-academic paper The Soul Selects her own Society - though the premise, linking Emily Dickinson and the world of H. G. Wells's War of the Worlds is brilliant.) At the Rialto is supposed to feature a conference for quantum physicists, but the topics discussed are at the most basic popular science level. It's just inconceivable that quantum physicists in the 1980s would be shocked and confused as they appear to be by, for example, tunnelling. The response to this one on both its humour and its science was to groan.

My only other complaint is that a couple of the stories - The Winds of Marble Arch and All Seated on the Ground are too long. It may be the cynic in me, but given stories are paid by the word I do wonder if this had something to do with how lengthy they are. It's not that they're bad stories. All Seated on the Ground particularly takes an absolutely brilliant (and light-hearted) approach to dealing with the problems of communicating with aliens. But both these stories feature an obsessive trying many different variations on theme to try to work something out, and after a while they get a touch repetitive.

However, the majority of the stories were excellent - and I don't think I've ever read a collection that was uniformly brilliant. The short story is a format where science fiction writers excel - and Willis shows why. Her style a cross between Bradbury and Aldiss, with the former’s lyricism and poignancy, and the latter’s sharpness. 

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more