Skip to main content

Athene Donald - Five Way Interview

Athene Donald is Professor Emerita in Experimental Physics and Master of Churchill College, University of Cambridge. Other than four years postdoctoral research in the USA, she has spent her career in Cambridge, specializing in soft matter physics and physics at the interface with biology. She was the University of Cambridge's first Gender Equality Champion, and has been involved in numerous initiatives concerning women in science. She was elected Fellow of the Royal Society in 1999 and appointed DBE for services to Physics in 2010. Her new book is Not Just for the Boys.

Why science?

Science is all about curiosity. It underpins so much of our world, yet many people – including the media – don’t trouble to think much about it or write about it and sometimes choose to pit science against the humanities and social sciences. This is unhelpful, to say the least, and I would like other people to share my enthusiasm for the subject, or at least recognize why it is crucially important. And why, specifically, it matters if society deters girls from thinking about the STEM subjects.

 Why this book?

I’ve been working on issues connected with diversity in science for many years. I feel angry that, despite years, or even decades, of recognizing that the lack of women in STEM is a problem for society, remarkably little has changed since I started out on my career. During the time I was the University of Cambridge’s first gender equality champion I ended up reading more social science literature on the subject than physics itself, and I wanted to gather together all I had learned when I wrote this book. It aims to be a distillation of the many diverse approaches to trying to shift the dial, but I have also included some of my personal experiences from throughout my career. I hope the book will be read, not just by early career women wanting to know what they can expect and how they may be able to counter the biases they encounter, but also the general public (notably parents, teachers and policy-makers). I believe everyone has a role to play in moving our society beyond crude stereotypes about what is appropriate for boys and girls, be it with regard to toys or careers. Boys are as badly impacted by such stereotypes as girls, and we are wasting much talent in our society by driving children in gendered directions.

A lot of the scientists (female and male) I speak to mention science fiction as sparking their interest - should we be encouraging more girls to read SF?

In my book I discuss the results from a study which looked at the impact of the X-Files Agent Scully on girls’ and young women’s level of interest in science – an effect which was very significant. So I agree, science fiction should be seen as appropriate reading for anyone and everyone and, if it sparks interest in science that’s brilliant. I am honoured that in Una McCormack’s books set in the Star Trek universe, she has named a spaceship the Athene Donald – those kinds of books can be important reading for young adults. But different people get excited by very different things. Although I read John Wyndham and CS Lewis’ science fiction books as a child, I never related that to actually ‘doing’ science, so such books certainly didn’t impact on my own choices. 

What’s next?

I’m already retired from my University position (the University of Cambridge currently still has an employer justified mandatory retirement age), and will retire from my role as Master of Churchill College at the end of the next academic year. I’ve been waiting to see how my book will be received, waiting to see whether the people beyond the science community pick up the content of my book: I really hope teachers, parents and policy-makers will read it and think hard about the implications for them personally. All this means now is obviously a good moment to think carefully about what to do with the rest of my life. I cannot imagine just being a woman of leisure.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I’ve been thinking about the issues for women in science for many years. But there are many other areas of disadvantage. I feel we should be paying more attention to the 50% of people who don’t go to university in the UK, some of whom are crucial in our labs as technicians of different kinds, for instance. As a country we need to do much better about supporting these people. Skills of all kinds are vital for our economy, and making sure that everyone can access appropriate courses should be a high priority.

On the scientific front, I am following with interest developments in greener sources of power: green hydrogen, green ammonia and new geothermal approaches to power generation. For all of us on the planet, these advances offer tremendous potential. There seem to be new advances occurring apace, which I am trying to keep abreast of.




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more