Skip to main content

Romeel Davé - Five Way Interview

Romeel Davé holds the Chair of Physics at the University of Edinburgh.  Born in California, he got his bachelor’s from U.C. Berkeley, MSc from Caltech, and PhD from U.C. Santa Cruz in 1998.  He was a professor in Tucson and Cape Town before coming to Edinburgh in 2017.   He is a leading researcher in using supercomputer simulations to better understand the formation of galaxies, their co-evolution with surrounding gas, and the nature of dark matter and dark energy.  Simulating the Cosmos is his first popular science book.

Why science?

My favorite game growing up was Clue.  I’ve always enjoyed piecing together evidence to solve a mystery.  Science is basically just a big detective game -- the Universe leaves you a bunch of random clues, and you have to tease out the underlying perpetrator.  It’s good fun, and as a bonus it’s gratifying to be part of humanity’s never-ending quest to push the frontiers of knowledge.

Why this book?

Many people view science as grand proclamations from a cabal of eggheads in white coats. But as scientists our day-to-day work is almost the polar opposite - a semi-blind stumble through a maze of wrong turns and dead ends.  I wanted to show how simulators like myself spend their days reasoning through roadblocks, designing and running numerical experiments, learning new skills as unexpectedly needed, and fighting through the daily frustrations of failure.  I wanted to show that despite all this, we inch ever closer towards answering some of humanity’s deepest questions.  This book was my homage to this scientific journey, as told through the twisting story of the development of cosmological simulations. 

Do you think simulations tend to be viewed as the poor cousin of science?

When I started my career, that was definitely true.  Now the situation is very different.  Not just in astronomy, but in physics, biology, or just about any science you look, simulations are slowly replacing traditional theory as the preferred way to interpret experimental or observational data.  The recently-inaugurated Flatiron Institute in New York is an example of this, where the Simons Foundation has invested hundreds of millions in new centres in fields from computational neuroscience to computational quantum to computational astrophysics. Simulations are revolutionising the way we do science, and arguably nowhere is this more apparent than in galaxy formation and cosmology.

What’s next?

When I started my career 30 years ago, my pie-in-the-sky dream was to run a simulation including all the known physics of galaxy formation within a cosmological context, from dust grains and molecules forming deep within the interstellar medium of galaxies to the ultraviolet radiation emitted by black holes pervading the universe on large scales.  I genuinely believe that within the next five years or so, we will achieve this, albeit using sub-grid models.  My group’s planned next generation of simulations, called KIARA, has this soup to nuts works that I envisioned so long ago, and even a few things that I hadn’t anticipated.  Other groups are working on similar things. Although there would still be lots left to do, this would be major milestone in the field, and for myself a nice career capstone.

What’s exciting to you at the moment?

The obvious answer in astronomy is the James Webb Space Telescope, which has already been transformational in understanding the distant universe; I’m involved in several big JWST programs.  But a lesser-known revolution is afoot in the radio: South Africa’s new MeerKAT radio interferometer will likewise be transformation for enabling studies of distant galaxies in the under-explored radio bands.  MeerKAT is the core of the upcoming Square Kilometre Array project, an international coalition headquartered in Manchester aiming at building next-generation radio facilities around the world.  I am still very connected to South African astronomy from my time as a SARChI Chair there, and I am going back to South Africa in 2024 for my sabbatical to help better understand how to use MeerKAT’s novel data to constrain our simulations for galaxy formation and cosmology.  It is always exciting to be able to probe into a new regime; the Universe never fails to surprise!




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re