Skip to main content

Kathryn Harkup - Five Way Interview

Kathryn Harkup is a chemist and author. Kathryn completed a doctorate on her favourite chemicals,  phosphines, and went on to further postdoctoral research before realising that talking,  writing and demonstrating  science appealed a bit more than hours slaving over a hot fume-hood. For six years she ran the outreach in  engineering, computing, physics  and maths at the University of Surrey, which involved writing talks on science topics that would appeal to  bored teenagers (anything disgusting  or dangerous was usually the most  popular). Kathryn is now a freelance science communicator delivering  talks and workshops on the quirky side  of science. Her new book is The Secret Lives of Molecules.

Why chemistry?

My interest in chemistry comes from a combination of a great teacher, a fascination with fire, explosions and pretty colours, and a love of finding things out. For me, the science is a great mix of big theories and practical experimentation. I love learning and I also love making things. Chemistry has rules and systems of organisation that appeal to the methodical and organised side of my personality, but practical chemistry is also an art and a skill. It is a subject that has enormous potential for creativity, spectacle and surprises. The products of this science can be intellectual oddities with no obvious use, and others can have rapid and direct impact on everyday lives. Like all the other sciences, chemisty has its share of interesting characters who have contributed to the advancement of the discipline, as well as fascinating stories.

Why this book?

The Secret Lives of Molecules was a natural followup to The Secret Lives of the Elements. I thoroughly enjoyed getting reacquainted with members of the periodic table for the first book, but chemistry is much more about how those elements interact with each other and combine forces to become something greater than the sum of their parts. I didn't want to write a textbook explaining the nuts and bolts of chemical interactions - there are plenty of those already. For me, one of the most interesting aspects of any subject is finding out how it fits in with everything else. I wanted to put some of these molecules into a context. For example, retinal is not a particularly interesting molecule in terms of the atoms it is made of or how they are arranged, but without it we, and many other animals on the planet, couldn't see. A rather ordinary molecule can have an extraordinary role simply because it happens to do something very well, such as change shape when a photon of light hits it. It was great fun finding new ways to present familiar substances and researching molecules I had never heard of before but that play an important part in our lives. Most importantly, I just wanted to tell some interesting stories.

There seem to be fewer popular chemistry books than any other aspect of science. Why do you think this is?

Physics and biology have within them some very visually impressive and relatable topics - space science or zoology - or they encompass big ideas such as gravity or evolution. There are plenty of aspects of both these subjects that rarely get written about in popular science books. I think chemistry can be a tough subject to grasp because the majority of it is not easily relatable. Appreciating how atoms and molecules too small to be seen by the naked eye can be manipulated and built up into all the different things around us is a huge conceptual leap. Chemistry books can very quickly get bogged down in minutiae that is difficult or tedious to follow - I hope I have avoided this.

What’s next?

I hope more chemistry. Writing The Secret Lives has made me remember why I enjoyed chemistry in the first place, thinking about atoms, molecules and their interactions. I love figuring out why chemicals can have the effects they do, be that in a global scale, such as with ozone, or the very personal, such as with hormones. It might be time to go back to finding out about poisons, those chemicals that in tiny amounts can have particularly dramatic effects.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

At the moment I am finding out about ants by reading a lovely book, Empire of Ants. It covers the science of these creatures as well as anecdotes of researching them in far flung parts of the globe and the problems of transporting them and studying them in the lab. I'm thoroughly enjoying it.


 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are
Post a Comment
Read more

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re
Post a Comment
Read more