Skip to main content

Kevin Mitchell - Five Way Interview

Kevin Mitchell is a graduate of the Genetics Department, Trinity College Dublin and received his PhD from the University of California at Berkeley (1997), where he studied nervous system development. He did postdoctoral research at Stanford University, using molecular genetics to study neural development in the mouse. Since 2002 he has been on the faculty at Trinity College Dublin and is now Associate Professor in Genetics and Neuroscience. He writes a popular blog on the intersection of genetics, development, neuroscience, psychology and psychiatry  His latest book is Free Agents, published by Princeton University Press, which is out now.

Why science?

I think I couldn’t help myself! I grew up with a fascination for the natural world, enchanted especially by animals and their behaviour. I also have always just wanted to understand things, at a deep level – it’s so frustrating not to! That led me to become a biologist and eventually to research at the intersection of genetics and neuroscience. Working in this field for nearly three decades now has only deepened my fascination for the wonders of the living world.

Why this book?

It felt important to me to push back on some of the claims and implications from neuroscience about what we really are. We’ve become so good at explaining behaviour and cognitive processes at the level of neural circuits that we risk explaining them away. We can be left with a picture of organisms, including human beings, as mere machines – complex stimulus-response automata, pushed around by neural mechanisms within them. This certainly seems to be the view of some prominent neuroscientists. However, we are not forced into that position. We can adopt a perspective that centres agency, goal-directedness, purpose, and meaning, couching these concepts in perfectly naturalistic terms. That was my goal with this book – to bring the organism back into the picture, to show how agency is actually the defining feature of life, and to argue that human beings in particular can exercise rational control over their behaviour in ways that fit the criteria for 'free will'.

Can a topic like this ever be purely scientific, or will there always be an element of philosophy?

Topics like agency and free will can – must! – be approached from both scientific and philosophical angles. I see these as highly complementary and both are necessary to get a good understanding of these phenomena. Paying attention to results from science can help ground otherwise abstract philosophical debates. Conversely, carefully considering conceptual issues and implicit philosophical framings can help keep scientists from making metaphysical claims that are not in fact supported by their findings.   

What’s next?

I’m just starting a new book – entitled The Genomic Code, for now – all about how the form and nature of an organism is encoded in its DNA. Debates about this go back to Aristotle and while modern genetics and developmental biology have revealed many of the underlying mechanisms, they haven’t really given us a good conceptual framework for how to think about the relationship between the genome and the organism. How does a simple molecule like DNA encode information about a complex thing like a cat or a dog or a human being – not just about their physical form, but their nature, their instincts and behavioural tendencies? How does the information get in there and how its interpreted through the processes of development? A clear, non-reductive way of thinking about that is what this book aims to provide. 

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I’m very excited by what feels like a move away from simple, reductive, mechanistic thinking in biology – trying to understand how living beings work by analyzing their parts – back towards a more holistic, organismic, ecological sort of framework. This is largely thanks to the development of technologies for studying whole systems at a time – recording from thousands of neurons in a behaving animal, for example, or tracking the expression of every gene in every cell in a developing embryo. Figuring out what all those data mean is a daunting task but there are amazing computational tools being developed that can help us do that, and conceptual tools from the study of complex systems that are just what we need to grasp the logic of the dynamic processes of life. 

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Interview by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more