Skip to main content

Kevin Mitchell - Five Way Interview

Kevin Mitchell is a graduate of the Genetics Department, Trinity College Dublin and received his PhD from the University of California at Berkeley (1997), where he studied nervous system development. He did postdoctoral research at Stanford University, using molecular genetics to study neural development in the mouse. Since 2002 he has been on the faculty at Trinity College Dublin and is now Associate Professor in Genetics and Neuroscience. He writes a popular blog on the intersection of genetics, development, neuroscience, psychology and psychiatry  His latest book is Free Agents, published by Princeton University Press, which is out now.

Why science?

I think I couldn’t help myself! I grew up with a fascination for the natural world, enchanted especially by animals and their behaviour. I also have always just wanted to understand things, at a deep level – it’s so frustrating not to! That led me to become a biologist and eventually to research at the intersection of genetics and neuroscience. Working in this field for nearly three decades now has only deepened my fascination for the wonders of the living world.

Why this book?

It felt important to me to push back on some of the claims and implications from neuroscience about what we really are. We’ve become so good at explaining behaviour and cognitive processes at the level of neural circuits that we risk explaining them away. We can be left with a picture of organisms, including human beings, as mere machines – complex stimulus-response automata, pushed around by neural mechanisms within them. This certainly seems to be the view of some prominent neuroscientists. However, we are not forced into that position. We can adopt a perspective that centres agency, goal-directedness, purpose, and meaning, couching these concepts in perfectly naturalistic terms. That was my goal with this book – to bring the organism back into the picture, to show how agency is actually the defining feature of life, and to argue that human beings in particular can exercise rational control over their behaviour in ways that fit the criteria for 'free will'.

Can a topic like this ever be purely scientific, or will there always be an element of philosophy?

Topics like agency and free will can – must! – be approached from both scientific and philosophical angles. I see these as highly complementary and both are necessary to get a good understanding of these phenomena. Paying attention to results from science can help ground otherwise abstract philosophical debates. Conversely, carefully considering conceptual issues and implicit philosophical framings can help keep scientists from making metaphysical claims that are not in fact supported by their findings.   

What’s next?

I’m just starting a new book – entitled The Genomic Code, for now – all about how the form and nature of an organism is encoded in its DNA. Debates about this go back to Aristotle and while modern genetics and developmental biology have revealed many of the underlying mechanisms, they haven’t really given us a good conceptual framework for how to think about the relationship between the genome and the organism. How does a simple molecule like DNA encode information about a complex thing like a cat or a dog or a human being – not just about their physical form, but their nature, their instincts and behavioural tendencies? How does the information get in there and how its interpreted through the processes of development? A clear, non-reductive way of thinking about that is what this book aims to provide. 

What’s exciting you at the moment?

I’m very excited by what feels like a move away from simple, reductive, mechanistic thinking in biology – trying to understand how living beings work by analyzing their parts – back towards a more holistic, organismic, ecological sort of framework. This is largely thanks to the development of technologies for studying whole systems at a time – recording from thousands of neurons in a behaving animal, for example, or tracking the expression of every gene in every cell in a developing embryo. Figuring out what all those data mean is a daunting task but there are amazing computational tools being developed that can help us do that, and conceptual tools from the study of complex systems that are just what we need to grasp the logic of the dynamic processes of life. 

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Interview by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who Invented the Computer? – Ian Watson

Ian Watson is the author of  The Universal Machine  and featured in a recent  Four Way Interview . Saturday June 23 2012 was the centenary of the birth of Alan Turing, the troubled genius who invented the modern computer. Why though do so few people recognize his name and his great achievements? In 1936 English mathematician Alan Turing, published a paper,  On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem . This became the foundation of computing. In it Turing presented a theoretical machine that could solve any problem that could be described by instructions encoded on a paper tape. A Turing Machine could calculate square roots, whilst another might solve Sudoku puzzles. Turing demonstrated you could construct a single  Universal Machine  that could simulate any Turing Machine. One machine solving any problem for which a program could be written – sound familiar? He’d invented the computer. Then,  computers  were peop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ignorance: How it drives science – Stuart Firestein *****

This is a delightful little book that really gets you thinking. I stress the ‘little’ part not as a negative, but as a good thing. There is nothing worse than fat, bloated popular science books where the author feels they have to get 120,000 words to be taken seriously. This is the sort of book that can be read in a couple of hours – but you will get so much more out of it than one of those tedious doorstops. The premise underlying the book is in once sense extremely simple, yet is fundamental to an understanding of what science is and what scientists do. And it is an understanding that is totally at odds with the typical way science is portrayed both in university lectures and popular science books. As Stuart Firestein points out, what is important is not the facts, but rather the area of ignorance. The interesting part and the fundamental heart of science is not about what we know, but about what we don’t know and where we want to look next. Take this lovely quote: ‘Working ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Star Book – Peter Grego ****

This attractive landscape format book combines an excellent introduction to the stars and basic astronomy with a set of star maps, plus in depth looks at some of the stars featured, with a  bonus section on the solar system. Amazon says it’s a hardback, but in fact it’s a paperback with a rather ingenious cover – you can’t tell from the photo, but the words ‘The Star Book’ are punched through as a series of holes that show the white paper of the next page beneath. Like many astronomy/space books, the cover lacks shelf appeal because it is mostly black, but at least there is some original thought here. Unlike many books in this format which tend to concentrate on the pictures, there is a good deal of excellent text by Peter Grego, so there was no feeling that you were only getting the star maps and star ‘biographies’, something these days much more suited to an iPad or smartphone app. Instead, the opening 30 or so pages give a very good introduction that would be valuable to ...
Post a Comment
Read more