Skip to main content

Star Binder (SF) - Robert Appleton ****

This is what I'd call a good old fashioned science fiction book - and it's none the worse for it. Star Binder follows a long tradition in what used to be called juvenile SF and now young adult books, which have teenage protagonists but that are enjoyably readable by adults - a tradition that ranges from James Blish's 1962 A Life for the Stars to Brandon Sanderson's modern Skyward series. These in themselves fit into a wider grouping of books where youngsters succeed where adults can't - think of anything from Harry Potter to the Famous Five.

The main character, Jim Trillion, is a thirteen-year-old, fending mostly for himself with his friend Sergei on a rough and ready colonised Mars. As a result of a brave action, his is recruited into a secret training programme that feels militaristic, but at the same time clearly isn't. So far, so average - and if this were all there was, with a few good action scenes, I'd feel it was a bit meh. But what Robert Appleton does very cleverly is to bring in a couple mysteries where we don't initially understand what is happening - these really pull the reader in, and are handled very well.

Jim and Sergei's initial adventures kept me reading, but when things get mysterious, the narrative moves up several notches, taking us away from the confines of Mars to find we're dealing with something far bigger in scope. I was also really pleased that this doesn't appear to be part of a huge series - at the moment few other than luminaries such as Adam Roberts seem capable of writing standalone science fiction (or fantasy) novels - they all have to be part of an immense plan for future books. Admittedly, the world building here allows for things to go a lot further, but this book works entirely as a standalone.

I have seen a one star Amazon review by someone who thinks this is cultural Marxism (whatever that is) - this entirely misses the point. Jim's friend Sergei has Belarussian roots (just as Jim has British roots) - and Sergei does go on about the 'Soviet way' - but the underlying ethos of the book seems to be about going beyond the ties that bind. Admittedly the way the teenagers in the training establishment are allowed to form factions that are not prevented from attacking each other seems a highly ineffective way to train people (even if it's not much different to the approach of some old public schools), but I wouldn't say there was much Marxism going on here.

It's not perfect. The final mysterious situation is so complex that it's quite hard to get your head around - and Appleton resorts to a bit of 'get out of jail free' plotting. Even so, there's some genuinely interesting and original thinking here, which is why I think it fits so well in a timeline stretching forward from Blish's equally intriguing ideas.

Paperback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on