Skip to main content

The Anomaly (SF) - Hervé Le Tellier, trans. Adriana Hunter *****

It was a pleasant surprise that this excellent novel far exceeded my expectations. This was in part because I thought of Hervé Le Tellier as a ‘literary fiction’ author, which for me generally suggests pomposity and intellectual obscurantism, and in part because it is in translation. With the notable exception of The Hair Carpet Weavers, I’ve generally found translated science fiction to be far too worthy and heavy-handed in its approach, but Adriana Hunter has done a fantastic job of keeping the writing light and gripping.

As for that literary aspect (amusingly, Le Tellier includes a character who writes a book called L’anomalie that is exactly the kind of thing I’d expected), this doesn’t overwhelm the reader because this book is unabashedly science fiction. I find it tedious in the extreme when certain literary authors who write a book that is clearly SF go out of their way to claim that’s not what they write, because they think that science fiction is limited to 'talking squids in outer space'. But what Le Tellier does is exactly what SF should – and why it is such a brilliant genre – it puts people in extraordinary science or technology-driven circumstances, far removed from the mundanity of conventional novels – and observes the impact on those circumstances as human beings.

Here the SF theme is the simulation hypothesis, the idea that we are all just part of a vast computer simulation – The Sims on steroids. This is put forward by scientists in the book as the most likely explanation for a weird happening. An Air France plane from Paris to New York that arrives in March, arrives again in June, with all the same people on it – so there are now two ‘versions’ of all those people.

The book explores both how the people involved cope with this – including all the implications for their families, possessions, jobs, even pensions – and what the authorities decide to do about it.

I was a bit concerned when chapter after chapter Le Tellier gives us the story of a different passenger. I’d recently read another book that used the approach of introducing five different sets of characters, and rapidly lost track of them. Here we get at least nine different threads, plus several sets of characters from the government response side, yet it’s a testament to Le Tellier (and Hunter)’s skill that I never found myself confused over which character was which.

The authority side of the response includes the reactions of key world leaders, notably the presidents of France and America. Although the book was first published in 2020, it is set in 2021, with the correct incumbent of the Elysee Palace named, though oddly Le Tellier assumes a different outcome to the 2020 US election to reality, given it’s very clear who the unnamed occupant of the White House is supposed to be.

What is absolutely fascinating (and why SF is such a powerful genre) is the way we can see how different individuals react in their own, sometimes extremely dramatic way to having to face up to the challenge posed by the situation. This is brilliantly handled. The underlying simulation hypothesis is arguably not science at all (because there is no way to test it, falsify it or use it to make predictions), but that reflects one of the strengths of SF that it doesn’t have to be too fussy about being based on hard science - plenty of familiar science fiction tropes are borderline science at best.

If there’s any weakness here, it’s the ending. I’m reminded of the novels of arguably the greatest ever fantasy writers, Gene Wolfe. Often, after what has been a spellbinding and thought-provoking book, the ending is a bit of a disappointment, because it’s pretty much impossible to come to any satisfactory conclusion. But that doesn’t stop Wolfe from being one of favourite writers – and  The Anomaly is, without doubt, the best SF novel I’ve read this year so far.


Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more