Skip to main content

The Memory Collectors (SF) - Dete Meserve ****

Dete Meserve structures her novel around four characters, each getting their own chapter in rotation until storylines start to cross. This is a difficult approach to engage with, as after the first four chapters it's hard to have any connection to a character, but in the context of the storyline it makes sense, and after a while everything does start to fit into place.

Each of our four is making a journey back in time using new technology developed by Californian startup Aeon Expeditions (founded by ex-husband of one of the four, Elizabeth). This is not time travel as science fiction usually portrays it. It is reminiscent of Daphne du Maurier's striking time travel novel The House on the Strand. In that book, the protagonist is able to mentally travel back to the fourteenth century, while his body remains in the present (putting him in danger, as his physical body moves across the landscape following the mental one in the past). in Meserve's book, the characters do travel back to a point in their past where they experience an hour being themselves at that point in time (not with their present bodies), but are able to act independently from their past lives, even though as soon as they return, the timeline snaps back to the way it was.

As we get into the plot, Meserve beautifully handles weaving together the four stories, ending up with a real page-turner for the chapters where, during a single day, all four live new versions of a life-altering event. I had to stay up late to get through these chapters - the whole thing is done with flair. My only slight moan plot-wise is the ending, which ties everything up with a bow and skirts over the apparent implication that at least one of the characters should be charged with murder. But that doesn't really matter - at the heart of the book is a 'what-if' of what would we do if we were sent back to a crucial turning point in our lives, with the potential to experience it differently, even though it won't change the real world.

Time travel is theoretically possible but not practically doable, so even with modern physics in mind, SF resorts to McGuffins to make it happen. Although there may be a scientific sugar-coating, under the hood whether it's the TARDIS, a DeLorean with a flux capacitor or Wells' Time Machine, what we experience is no more scientific than Mark Twain's use of a bump on the head in Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. Meserve weaves in suitable scientific terms like closed time-like curves, but leaving aside the practical impossibilities of using these, the physics would not enable travel to before they were invented - and they would not magically transform you back into your past body. But as there isn't a true hard science time travel story, we have to just go with the flow.

Overall, the premise is fascinating and despite the unlikely time travel mode, it was an engaging read, climaxing with the fateful day where it becomes an energetic page-turner. 

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Buy me a coffee
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that â€˜Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more