Skip to main content

The Memory Collectors (SF) - Dete Meserve ****

Dete Meserve structures her novel around four characters, each getting their own chapter in rotation until storylines start to cross. This is a difficult approach to engage with, as after the first four chapters it's hard to have any connection to a character, but in the context of the storyline it makes sense, and after a while everything does start to fit into place.

Each of our four is making a journey back in time using new technology developed by Californian startup Aeon Expeditions (founded by ex-husband of one of the four, Elizabeth). This is not time travel as science fiction usually portrays it. It is reminiscent of Daphne du Maurier's striking time travel novel The House on the Strand. In that book, the protagonist is able to mentally travel back to the fourteenth century, while his body remains in the present (putting him in danger, as his physical body moves across the landscape following the mental one in the past). in Meserve's book, the characters do travel back to a point in their past where they experience an hour being themselves at that point in time (not with their present bodies), but are able to act independently from their past lives, even though as soon as they return, the timeline snaps back to the way it was.

As we get into the plot, Meserve beautifully handles weaving together the four stories, ending up with a real page-turner for the chapters where, during a single day, all four live new versions of a life-altering event. I had to stay up late to get through these chapters - the whole thing is done with flair. My only slight moan plot-wise is the ending, which ties everything up with a bow and skirts over the apparent implication that at least one of the characters should be charged with murder. But that doesn't really matter - at the heart of the book is a 'what-if' of what would we do if we were sent back to a crucial turning point in our lives, with the potential to experience it differently, even though it won't change the real world.

Time travel is theoretically possible but not practically doable, so even with modern physics in mind, SF resorts to McGuffins to make it happen. Although there may be a scientific sugar-coating, under the hood whether it's the TARDIS, a DeLorean with a flux capacitor or Wells' Time Machine, what we experience is no more scientific than Mark Twain's use of a bump on the head in Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. Meserve weaves in suitable scientific terms like closed time-like curves, but leaving aside the practical impossibilities of using these, the physics would not enable travel to before they were invented - and they would not magically transform you back into your past body. But as there isn't a true hard science time travel story, we have to just go with the flow.

Overall, the premise is fascinating and despite the unlikely time travel mode, it was an engaging read, climaxing with the fateful day where it becomes an energetic page-turner. 

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more