Skip to main content

Permafrost (SF) - Kate Kelly *****

As the title suggests, this new book from Kate Kelly is a kind of mirror-image counterpart to her earlier novel, The Arid Lands, from 2023. You can find my review of that one on Goodreads. Both feature futures where, owing to changes in the global climate, human society has become much more fragmented, with some communities retaining a higher degree of civilisation than others. In the first book, set in a hot, dry future, the range was roughly from the 1950s back to mediaeval times. In this one, set in a much bleaker, deep-frozen future, the mediaeval culture is actually the more modern one, beset on all sides by barbarian savagery. The plots of the two books have a mirror-image quality, too. The first one is about a late-teen female protagonist whose initial concern is simply to look after her slightly younger male sibling, but then ends up having to save the world virtually single-handed. Permafrost has a similar scenario, but with the genders reversed.

As far as the actual stories are concerned, there are similarities and differences. Ultimately, I found the differences more striking – particularly in tone – but their underlying themes are similar. Both novels revolve around the disastrous consequences of a massive geoengineering project that a previous generation rushed into without doing a proper risk assessment. The fault isn’t with the technology itself, or with evil people setting out to do evil things, but with single-minded idealists getting too fixated on solving one specific problem without thinking through all the negative consequences. In The Arid Lands the problems were relatively local, centred on the Mediterranean region, but in Permafrost – which is also set in southern Europe – they’re truly global.

The wider scope of the disaster in Permafrost – coupled with the fact that large parts of the world have reverted to an almost bestial level of barbarism – makes this a much darker novel. In my review of The Arid Lands, I said how its fast-moving, twisty plot and problem-solving female protagonist reminded me of point-and-click adventure games. That’s a cosily escapist genre, and cosy is one thing that Permafrost definitely isn’t. Although the hero is still trying to save the world, he goes about it in an action-oriented rather than problem-solving way. In fact many of the scenes have a decidedly sword-and-sorcery feel to them – a genre that was hugely popular when I was in my teens, and which I still have a soft spot for. The battle scenes are very well written, and unlike Kate Kelly’s previous protagonists, this one is alarmingly bloodthirsty. I lost count of the number of bad guys he enthusiastically decapitated or ran through with his sword.

This is not sword-and-sorcery fiction, however, as it has a good scientific rationale underlying it. And as with all the best science fiction – the written kind, I mean, not Hollywood movies – it sets you thinking. That’s good, because it makes you consider things you may never have thought about before, but it does have the downside that you end up spotting problems the author has conveniently ignored. I’m not enough of an expert to say for sure, but I think that in the scenario as it’s presented in the novel, there would be little if any plant life on the planet. While trees are regularly described as dead or dying, wouldn’t the same also be true of the smaller plants, grown in vast indoor greenhouses, that the city-dwellers use for food? And with a lack of plants, wouldn’t that disrupt the whole food chain for animals as well? If you’re anything like me, you see questions like this as adding to the story rather than distracting from it, because it’s forcing you to think about things that wouldn’t occur to you otherwise. So if you like your fiction to be maximally thought-provoking, do check out Permafrost – and The Arid Lands too, if you haven’t read it yet. They’re only a couple of pounds each on Kindle.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Andrew May - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...