Skip to main content

Life Beyond Earth - Luigi Vacca ****

Astrobiology is an unusual science in that there’s no clear, undisputed evidence that its subject of study – extraterrestrial life – even exists. It’s still an active field of research, though, with observational astronomers scouring the skies for telltale signs of life, and theoreticians tying themselves in knots trying to explain why we haven’t seen any of those signs yet. This book deals almost exclusively with the second of those topics.

Before going any further, it’s worth defining exactly what we mean by ‘life’ in this context. If you’d asked Aristotle or Shakespeare or Charles Darwin to define life, they’d give pretty much the same answer, relating to biological processes. If we can’t detect such processes at a distance of many light years, that’s not really a great surprise: the latest generation of telescopes has only just got to the point where it might be possible even in principle. But many popular discussions of extraterrestrial life, this book included, aren’t talking about life in the biological sense at all. They mean technology, in the form of space vehicles, radio communication and such like. These are things we might actually be expected to detect, so the question posed in the book’s subtitle – ‘Why Are We Still Waiting to Meet Aliens?’ – is a sensible one to ask.

This is referred to as the Fermi Paradox – a name that’s strikingly memorable but not particularly accurate, because it’s not really a paradox at all. That would only be the case if we were absolutely certain the galaxy is filled with lifeforms that we ought to be able to detect easily. This may have been the view of Enrico Fermi, the Italian physicist who gave his name to the paradox after famously asking the question ‘Where are they?’ in 1950, but with our current understanding of the relevant areas –  astronomy, biology, technology and so on – it seems far less clear cut. That’s the point that Vacca makes in the first half of this book.

The second half then summarises some of the many solutions to the Fermi Paradox that have been put forward. Perhaps the most obvious of these is the idea that technological civilisations are virtually non-existent, or at least extremely short-lived before they destroy themselves (or ‘regress’ to the arguably more stable and civilised level of Aristotle, Shakespeare et al). Another possibility is that, for one reason or another, technologically advanced civilisations deliberately hide their presence, or (and this is my personal favourite) prefer an introverted virtual reality existence because it’s cheaper, safer and more interesting than living in the the real world.

When it comes to science books, there’s often a choice between serious and authoritative on the one hand, or thought-provoking and entertaining on the other. If you’re looking for the first kind, the best you could do is probably The Great Silence by Milan Cirkovic, a professional philosopher who specialises in this field. Luigi Vacca’s book, on the other hand, is definitely in the second category. He’s a computer scientist by profession, writing here about a subject that fascinates him – which helps bring it to life for a general audience without going into too much technical detail (although there are fifteen pages of bibliographical notes at the end, for anyone who’s interested in delving deeper). His English is also wonderfully clear and easy to read, which isn’t always the case with non-native speakers. So if you’re new to the whole subject of the Fermi Paradox, this is a great introduction.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Andrew May - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...