Skip to main content

Life Beyond Earth - Luigi Vacca ****

Astrobiology is an unusual science in that there’s no clear, undisputed evidence that its subject of study – extraterrestrial life – even exists. It’s still an active field of research, though, with observational astronomers scouring the skies for telltale signs of life, and theoreticians tying themselves in knots trying to explain why we haven’t seen any of those signs yet. This book deals almost exclusively with the second of those topics.

Before going any further, it’s worth defining exactly what we mean by ‘life’ in this context. If you’d asked Aristotle or Shakespeare or Charles Darwin to define life, they’d give pretty much the same answer, relating to biological processes. If we can’t detect such processes at a distance of many light years, that’s not really a great surprise: the latest generation of telescopes has only just got to the point where it might be possible even in principle. But many popular discussions of extraterrestrial life, this book included, aren’t talking about life in the biological sense at all. They mean technology, in the form of space vehicles, radio communication and such like. These are things we might actually be expected to detect, so the question posed in the book’s subtitle – ‘Why Are We Still Waiting to Meet Aliens?’ – is a sensible one to ask.

This is referred to as the Fermi Paradox – a name that’s strikingly memorable but not particularly accurate, because it’s not really a paradox at all. That would only be the case if we were absolutely certain the galaxy is filled with lifeforms that we ought to be able to detect easily. This may have been the view of Enrico Fermi, the Italian physicist who gave his name to the paradox after famously asking the question ‘Where are they?’ in 1950, but with our current understanding of the relevant areas –  astronomy, biology, technology and so on – it seems far less clear cut. That’s the point that Vacca makes in the first half of this book.

The second half then summarises some of the many solutions to the Fermi Paradox that have been put forward. Perhaps the most obvious of these is the idea that technological civilisations are virtually non-existent, or at least extremely short-lived before they destroy themselves (or ‘regress’ to the arguably more stable and civilised level of Aristotle, Shakespeare et al). Another possibility is that, for one reason or another, technologically advanced civilisations deliberately hide their presence, or (and this is my personal favourite) prefer an introverted virtual reality existence because it’s cheaper, safer and more interesting than living in the the real world.

When it comes to science books, there’s often a choice between serious and authoritative on the one hand, or thought-provoking and entertaining on the other. If you’re looking for the first kind, the best you could do is probably The Great Silence by Milan Cirkovic, a professional philosopher who specialises in this field. Luigi Vacca’s book, on the other hand, is definitely in the second category. He’s a computer scientist by profession, writing here about a subject that fascinates him – which helps bring it to life for a general audience without going into too much technical detail (although there are fifteen pages of bibliographical notes at the end, for anyone who’s interested in delving deeper). His English is also wonderfully clear and easy to read, which isn’t always the case with non-native speakers. So if you’re new to the whole subject of the Fermi Paradox, this is a great introduction.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Andrew May - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who Invented the Computer? – Ian Watson

Ian Watson is the author of  The Universal Machine  and featured in a recent  Four Way Interview . Saturday June 23 2012 was the centenary of the birth of Alan Turing, the troubled genius who invented the modern computer. Why though do so few people recognize his name and his great achievements? In 1936 English mathematician Alan Turing, published a paper,  On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem . This became the foundation of computing. In it Turing presented a theoretical machine that could solve any problem that could be described by instructions encoded on a paper tape. A Turing Machine could calculate square roots, whilst another might solve Sudoku puzzles. Turing demonstrated you could construct a single  Universal Machine  that could simulate any Turing Machine. One machine solving any problem for which a program could be written – sound familiar? He’d invented the computer. Then,  computers  were peop...

The Star Book – Peter Grego ****

This attractive landscape format book combines an excellent introduction to the stars and basic astronomy with a set of star maps, plus in depth looks at some of the stars featured, with a  bonus section on the solar system. Amazon says it’s a hardback, but in fact it’s a paperback with a rather ingenious cover – you can’t tell from the photo, but the words ‘The Star Book’ are punched through as a series of holes that show the white paper of the next page beneath. Like many astronomy/space books, the cover lacks shelf appeal because it is mostly black, but at least there is some original thought here. Unlike many books in this format which tend to concentrate on the pictures, there is a good deal of excellent text by Peter Grego, so there was no feeling that you were only getting the star maps and star ‘biographies’, something these days much more suited to an iPad or smartphone app. Instead, the opening 30 or so pages give a very good introduction that would be valuable to ...

Ignorance: How it drives science – Stuart Firestein *****

This is a delightful little book that really gets you thinking. I stress the ‘little’ part not as a negative, but as a good thing. There is nothing worse than fat, bloated popular science books where the author feels they have to get 120,000 words to be taken seriously. This is the sort of book that can be read in a couple of hours – but you will get so much more out of it than one of those tedious doorstops. The premise underlying the book is in once sense extremely simple, yet is fundamental to an understanding of what science is and what scientists do. And it is an understanding that is totally at odds with the typical way science is portrayed both in university lectures and popular science books. As Stuart Firestein points out, what is important is not the facts, but rather the area of ignorance. The interesting part and the fundamental heart of science is not about what we know, but about what we don’t know and where we want to look next. Take this lovely quote: ‘Working ...