Skip to main content

Royal Observatory Greenwich: A History in Objects - Louise Devoy *****

Even as someone who rarely gets on with 'bitty' books, I was captivated by this collection of articles based primarily on objects in or relating to the Royal Observatory at Greenwich. After some introductory material introducing the observatory, the Astronomers Royal and the search for means to identify longitude that was instrumental in the setting up of the Royal Observatory in the 1670s, Louise Devoy splits her history across the first ten Astronomers Royal, taking the reader from 1675 to 1955.

Each of these sections starts with a pen sketch of the relevant astronomer, from nazmes likely to be known by popular astronomy readers such as Flamsteed and Halley to the more obscure Pond and Spencer Jones. We then get an illustrated guide to a host of objects that are located in the observatory, picture it, or are relevant to it, such as the magnificent-looking Longitude Act of 1714.

Inevitably some of the objects are more interesting than others, so, for instance, I couldn't get too excited about a 'chart of the Southern Celestial Hemisphere' produced by Edmond Halley and James Clerk in 1678 - it's an important star chart for the period, but visually somewhat dull. Many of the objects, though, were genuinely intriguing. Randomly, I'd pick out Flamsteed's hefty 7 foot sextant (sadly a drawing rather than the object itself), Harrison's H1 chronometer, Caroline Herschel's dress and bonnet, the Airy Transit Circle and the delightful example of ephemera in an 1890ish 'Greetings from Greenwich' postcard, sent in 1907 by 'a young girl called Maud... to convey birthday wishes to her cousin Winnie in Portsmouth.'

Greenwich has always been associated with time, not just in pinning down longitude, but as the home of the Greenwich meridian (hence GMT) and the famous time ball, first installed in 1833, which drops at 1pm each day. Not surprisingly, then, there are quite a few entries for clocks and a general introduction to how mechanical clocks work, alongside a number of other 'in focus' articles, such as one looking at 'the age of magnetism' and Greenwich's role in investigating variations in the Earth's magnetic field.

This is physically a very handsome book (priced accordingly), though it's a shame the pages are matte rather than glossy, making the illustrations look less striking than they could have done. Nonetheless, they are high enough quality to work effectively. I still struggle a little to know how to read a book like this that sits part way between a text-based history of science and a coffee table book. I did work through it end to end, but I think it is more like to be enjoyed by dipping in now and again - though the text is too detailed not to appreciate it carefully. I was concerned when I first saw it that it might be the kind of vanity project institutions like to publish about themselves, but thankfully it is far more than that.

Hardback:   

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...
Post a Comment
Read more

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...
Post a Comment
Read more