Skip to main content

Royal Observatory Greenwich: A History in Objects - Louise Devoy *****

Even as someone who rarely gets on with 'bitty' books, I was captivated by this collection of articles based primarily on objects in or relating to the Royal Observatory at Greenwich. After some introductory material introducing the observatory, the Astronomers Royal and the search for means to identify longitude that was instrumental in the setting up of the Royal Observatory in the 1670s, Louise Devoy splits her history across the first ten Astronomers Royal, taking the reader from 1675 to 1955.

Each of these sections starts with a pen sketch of the relevant astronomer, from nazmes likely to be known by popular astronomy readers such as Flamsteed and Halley to the more obscure Pond and Spencer Jones. We then get an illustrated guide to a host of objects that are located in the observatory, picture it, or are relevant to it, such as the magnificent-looking Longitude Act of 1714.

Inevitably some of the objects are more interesting than others, so, for instance, I couldn't get too excited about a 'chart of the Southern Celestial Hemisphere' produced by Edmond Halley and James Clerk in 1678 - it's an important star chart for the period, but visually somewhat dull. Many of the objects, though, were genuinely intriguing. Randomly, I'd pick out Flamsteed's hefty 7 foot sextant (sadly a drawing rather than the object itself), Harrison's H1 chronometer, Caroline Herschel's dress and bonnet, the Airy Transit Circle and the delightful example of ephemera in an 1890ish 'Greetings from Greenwich' postcard, sent in 1907 by 'a young girl called Maud... to convey birthday wishes to her cousin Winnie in Portsmouth.'

Greenwich has always been associated with time, not just in pinning down longitude, but as the home of the Greenwich meridian (hence GMT) and the famous time ball, first installed in 1833, which drops at 1pm each day. Not surprisingly, then, there are quite a few entries for clocks and a general introduction to how mechanical clocks work, alongside a number of other 'in focus' articles, such as one looking at 'the age of magnetism' and Greenwich's role in investigating variations in the Earth's magnetic field.

This is physically a very handsome book (priced accordingly), though it's a shame the pages are matte rather than glossy, making the illustrations look less striking than they could have done. Nonetheless, they are high enough quality to work effectively. I still struggle a little to know how to read a book like this that sits part way between a text-based history of science and a coffee table book. I did work through it end to end, but I think it is more like to be enjoyed by dipping in now and again - though the text is too detailed not to appreciate it carefully. I was concerned when I first saw it that it might be the kind of vanity project institutions like to publish about themselves, but thankfully it is far more than that.

Hardback:   

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more