Skip to main content

Royal Observatory Greenwich: A History in Objects - Louise Devoy *****

Even as someone who rarely gets on with 'bitty' books, I was captivated by this collection of articles based primarily on objects in or relating to the Royal Observatory at Greenwich. After some introductory material introducing the observatory, the Astronomers Royal and the search for means to identify longitude that was instrumental in the setting up of the Royal Observatory in the 1670s, Louise Devoy splits her history across the first ten Astronomers Royal, taking the reader from 1675 to 1955.

Each of these sections starts with a pen sketch of the relevant astronomer, from nazmes likely to be known by popular astronomy readers such as Flamsteed and Halley to the more obscure Pond and Spencer Jones. We then get an illustrated guide to a host of objects that are located in the observatory, picture it, or are relevant to it, such as the magnificent-looking Longitude Act of 1714.

Inevitably some of the objects are more interesting than others, so, for instance, I couldn't get too excited about a 'chart of the Southern Celestial Hemisphere' produced by Edmond Halley and James Clerk in 1678 - it's an important star chart for the period, but visually somewhat dull. Many of the objects, though, were genuinely intriguing. Randomly, I'd pick out Flamsteed's hefty 7 foot sextant (sadly a drawing rather than the object itself), Harrison's H1 chronometer, Caroline Herschel's dress and bonnet, the Airy Transit Circle and the delightful example of ephemera in an 1890ish 'Greetings from Greenwich' postcard, sent in 1907 by 'a young girl called Maud... to convey birthday wishes to her cousin Winnie in Portsmouth.'

Greenwich has always been associated with time, not just in pinning down longitude, but as the home of the Greenwich meridian (hence GMT) and the famous time ball, first installed in 1833, which drops at 1pm each day. Not surprisingly, then, there are quite a few entries for clocks and a general introduction to how mechanical clocks work, alongside a number of other 'in focus' articles, such as one looking at 'the age of magnetism' and Greenwich's role in investigating variations in the Earth's magnetic field.

This is physically a very handsome book (priced accordingly), though it's a shame the pages are matte rather than glossy, making the illustrations look less striking than they could have done. Nonetheless, they are high enough quality to work effectively. I still struggle a little to know how to read a book like this that sits part way between a text-based history of science and a coffee table book. I did work through it end to end, but I think it is more like to be enjoyed by dipping in now and again - though the text is too detailed not to appreciate it carefully. I was concerned when I first saw it that it might be the kind of vanity project institutions like to publish about themselves, but thankfully it is far more than that.

Hardback:   

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more