Skip to main content

Royal Observatory Greenwich: A History in Objects - Louise Devoy *****

Even as someone who rarely gets on with 'bitty' books, I was captivated by this collection of articles based primarily on objects in or relating to the Royal Observatory at Greenwich. After some introductory material introducing the observatory, the Astronomers Royal and the search for means to identify longitude that was instrumental in the setting up of the Royal Observatory in the 1670s, Louise Devoy splits her history across the first ten Astronomers Royal, taking the reader from 1675 to 1955.

Each of these sections starts with a pen sketch of the relevant astronomer, from nazmes likely to be known by popular astronomy readers such as Flamsteed and Halley to the more obscure Pond and Spencer Jones. We then get an illustrated guide to a host of objects that are located in the observatory, picture it, or are relevant to it, such as the magnificent-looking Longitude Act of 1714.

Inevitably some of the objects are more interesting than others, so, for instance, I couldn't get too excited about a 'chart of the Southern Celestial Hemisphere' produced by Edmond Halley and James Clerk in 1678 - it's an important star chart for the period, but visually somewhat dull. Many of the objects, though, were genuinely intriguing. Randomly, I'd pick out Flamsteed's hefty 7 foot sextant (sadly a drawing rather than the object itself), Harrison's H1 chronometer, Caroline Herschel's dress and bonnet, the Airy Transit Circle and the delightful example of ephemera in an 1890ish 'Greetings from Greenwich' postcard, sent in 1907 by 'a young girl called Maud... to convey birthday wishes to her cousin Winnie in Portsmouth.'

Greenwich has always been associated with time, not just in pinning down longitude, but as the home of the Greenwich meridian (hence GMT) and the famous time ball, first installed in 1833, which drops at 1pm each day. Not surprisingly, then, there are quite a few entries for clocks and a general introduction to how mechanical clocks work, alongside a number of other 'in focus' articles, such as one looking at 'the age of magnetism' and Greenwich's role in investigating variations in the Earth's magnetic field.

This is physically a very handsome book (priced accordingly), though it's a shame the pages are matte rather than glossy, making the illustrations look less striking than they could have done. Nonetheless, they are high enough quality to work effectively. I still struggle a little to know how to read a book like this that sits part way between a text-based history of science and a coffee table book. I did work through it end to end, but I think it is more like to be enjoyed by dipping in now and again - though the text is too detailed not to appreciate it carefully. I was concerned when I first saw it that it might be the kind of vanity project institutions like to publish about themselves, but thankfully it is far more than that.

Hardback:   

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more