Skip to main content

The Pale Blue Data Point - Jon Willis *****

The title tells you exactly what this book is about, if a little cryptically. The ‘pale blue dot’ is our own planet Earth, seen from a cosmic viewpoint – and, as far as astrobiology is concerned, it’s actually the only data point we have, counterbalancing centuries of theorising, speculation and fantasy. The book’s scope is summarised in less poetic terms in the subtitle: ‘An Earth-Based Perspective on the Search for Alien Life’. Over the years we’ve reviewed quite a few books about astrobiology on this site, but while many of these have made the point that useful things can be learned about the subject by studying our own planet, it’s generally only been a few tantalising comments in passing. So a whole book on this topic is long overdue and very welcome.

Having been interested in space and astronomy for over 50 years now, it irritates me how some misconceptions just refuse to go away, generation after generation. One example is the notion that the Earth and space are two completely separate things, and that any suggestion of a connection between the two lies in the realm of UFOs and science fiction. That’s nonsense, of course – there’s no atom of matter on our planet that didn’t originate in some other part of the galaxy, and we’re now pretty sure there are millions of other planets having a similar composition, structure and environment. In astronomical terms, the Earth really is what the book’s title says – a data point – and there’s no reason to suppose that’s not true from an astrobiological point of view too.The great thing about studying the Earth, as opposed to other planets, is that it’s something we can all do. Jon Willis is a professor of astronomy – but astronomy is a wide field, and his day job has nothing to do with astrobiology. It is really just his hobby, and large parts of the book have a distinct (and enviable, for someone of my age and sedentary nature) element of ‘scientific tourism’, to use Willis’s own phrase. He doesn’t just tell us how we can learn about the moons of Jupiter – or ancient Mars, or the formation of planetary systems, or communicating with extraterrestrials – here on Earth, he actually goes out and does it himself.

Close to his home on the west coast of Canada, we find Willis doing a stint as a science communicator – broadcasting to schools and museums – on board a research vessel operating deep-sea submersibles. The astrobiological interest here lies in the thriving ecosystems surrounding hydrothermal vents, which may possibly have a counterpart in the ice-covered ocean of Jupiter’s moon Europa. There’s a slight catch, which I don’t think I’d appreciated before, in that all the easily visible lifeforms around deep-sea vents are actually dependent on Earth’s global ecosystem – including photosynthesising algae up near the sea surface – and hence not something that’s likely to be found on Europa. On the other hand, microscopic chemosynthetic bacteria, which are also present in Earth’s hydrothermal vents, just might be.

For Mars, Willis travels to Australia to examine stromatolites – colonies of very primitive organisms called cyanobacteria – both in living form in Shark Bay and as ancient fossils in the Pilbara Craton. Way back when the latter were formed, Mars was almost a twin of Earth in terms of climate and surface environment, so it’s not unreasonable to imagine that stromatolites might have arisen there too. Another field trip sees Willis on a meteorite hunting expedition in Morocco, eventually coming away with quite a haul – although he admits that, apart from a few tiny fragments that he picked up from the desert floor, these were mostly shop purchases. Astrophysically, meteorites are important because they tell us about the composition of the very young solar system, soon after its formation – and they’re important for life on Earth, too, because they were the likely source of at least some of our water.

The last chapter sees Willis swimming with a group of dolphins off the Bahamas, as he accompanies a team of scientists studying the way these animals communicate with each other. The significance for astrobiology is that dolphins have an incredibly wide and complex range of vocalisations – whistles, clicks and squawks – and yet even today we have no idea what they’re saying to each other, beyond recognising the names, or call-signs, of individual dolphins. If they really do have their own language, then we’re nowhere near cracking it – which doesn’t say much for our ability to decode any genuinely alien message we might receive in future.

Despite the fact that it hardly ever leaves Earth, I found this the most fascinating and eye-opening book about extraterrestrial life that I’ve read for a long time. [Ed: It's an interesting contrast with Willis's earlier, more conventional astrobiology book.] The word astrobiology suggests the intersection of two completely different branches of science, astronomy and biology – but Willis’s approach makes it clear that many other disciplines are important as well, including chemistry, geology, palaeontology, oceanography and even linguistics. In fact, if it’s relevant to the study of life on Earth – still our one and only data point – then it’s relevant to the search for life elsewhere too.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Andrew May - See all our online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...