Skip to main content

Sarah Bearchell - Five Way Interview

Sarah Bearchell is a science writer and educator who has created educational activities for charities, learned societies and science centres, and who writes regularly for Aquila. The Future of Agriculture is her first book. 

Why science?

I’ve always been curious. When I was little, I used to make mud pies with different ingredients like stones, grass and sticks. When they had set into hard bricks, I would turn them out and see if they collapsed when I stood on them. It was a long-running and very unscientific investigation which resulted in joy and mess in equal measures. Formal science was the next step…which resulted in more joy and mess as I moved towards ecology, agriculture and horticulture! 

Why this book?

I’ve always wanted to write a proper book, and by that, I mean a book produced by a proper publisher, in hard copy, to be sold in a bookshop and be purchased (and hopefully read by!) people who I’ve never met.

One day, I saw a call-out for agricultural writers for a popular science book. It caught my eye because my academic background is in agricultural botany, but for the last ten years I’ve been writing about diverse science topics for children, so I didn’t feel like the best fit. But then the call appeared again, at a time when I was looking for a new project, so I contacted the series editor. 

He said I’d have some guidance, and it only needed to be 40,000 words, which didn’t feel particularly daunting having written a doctoral thesis. And I found myself thinking why not?

Well, there’s the arrogance of someone who has never written a book before! It has genuinely been one of the hardest work projects I’ve ever done. Agriculture is such a HUGE topic to fit in such a slim volume, and the research phase took me down some fascinating rabbit-holes. It was a real challenge to select the right examples to create a coherent story within the target length.

Should we attempt to make the UK more self-sufficient in food?

Yes! Without a doubt! We can all help towards this by reducing food waste, eating seasonal (rather than imported) food and by reducing the amount of meat and dairy we consume. That would free up land to grow plant-proteins, so we could produce more of our diet from the limited farmland we have available in the UK. 

We also need long-term planning at the government level, which supports both farmers and consumers as these changes happen. That must include accelerating the change to renewable energy to reduce electricity costs, which will make it cheaper to produce delicate salad crops in glasshouses and vertical farms. That would help to both reduce seasonal imports and enable us to grow more crops on less land. 

What’s next?

I normally write about science for children, families and teachers – with the emphasis on practical investigation. I love the challenge of developing activities which explore scientific concepts using everyday resources. I also write and present science shows for festivals, which are designed to be multisensory and participatory, so they work for everyone. It’s wonderful to experience other people’s engagement with science!

What’s exciting you at the moment?

University engineering departments! One of my children is planning to study engineering and I’m finding the departmental tours fascinating. It’s a path I might have taken had circumstances been different…and had my school’s biology teachers not been so incredibly brilliant (thanks, Miss Mappledoram and Mr Woodcock!).

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...
Post a Comment
Read more

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...
Post a Comment
Read more