Skip to main content

Sarah Bearchell - Five Way Interview

Sarah Bearchell is a science writer and educator who has created educational activities for charities, learned societies and science centres, and who writes regularly for Aquila. The Future of Agriculture is her first book. 

Why science?

I’ve always been curious. When I was little, I used to make mud pies with different ingredients like stones, grass and sticks. When they had set into hard bricks, I would turn them out and see if they collapsed when I stood on them. It was a long-running and very unscientific investigation which resulted in joy and mess in equal measures. Formal science was the next step…which resulted in more joy and mess as I moved towards ecology, agriculture and horticulture! 

Why this book?

I’ve always wanted to write a proper book, and by that, I mean a book produced by a proper publisher, in hard copy, to be sold in a bookshop and be purchased (and hopefully read by!) people who I’ve never met.

One day, I saw a call-out for agricultural writers for a popular science book. It caught my eye because my academic background is in agricultural botany, but for the last ten years I’ve been writing about diverse science topics for children, so I didn’t feel like the best fit. But then the call appeared again, at a time when I was looking for a new project, so I contacted the series editor. 

He said I’d have some guidance, and it only needed to be 40,000 words, which didn’t feel particularly daunting having written a doctoral thesis. And I found myself thinking why not?

Well, there’s the arrogance of someone who has never written a book before! It has genuinely been one of the hardest work projects I’ve ever done. Agriculture is such a HUGE topic to fit in such a slim volume, and the research phase took me down some fascinating rabbit-holes. It was a real challenge to select the right examples to create a coherent story within the target length.

Should we attempt to make the UK more self-sufficient in food?

Yes! Without a doubt! We can all help towards this by reducing food waste, eating seasonal (rather than imported) food and by reducing the amount of meat and dairy we consume. That would free up land to grow plant-proteins, so we could produce more of our diet from the limited farmland we have available in the UK. 

We also need long-term planning at the government level, which supports both farmers and consumers as these changes happen. That must include accelerating the change to renewable energy to reduce electricity costs, which will make it cheaper to produce delicate salad crops in glasshouses and vertical farms. That would help to both reduce seasonal imports and enable us to grow more crops on less land. 

What’s next?

I normally write about science for children, families and teachers – with the emphasis on practical investigation. I love the challenge of developing activities which explore scientific concepts using everyday resources. I also write and present science shows for festivals, which are designed to be multisensory and participatory, so they work for everyone. It’s wonderful to experience other people’s engagement with science!

What’s exciting you at the moment?

University engineering departments! One of my children is planning to study engineering and I’m finding the departmental tours fascinating. It’s a path I might have taken had circumstances been different…and had my school’s biology teachers not been so incredibly brilliant (thanks, Miss Mappledoram and Mr Woodcock!).

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more