Skip to main content

Michael Banks - Five Way Interview

Michael Banks is a science writer and author and is currently news editor of Physics World magazine. As well as Physics World, he has written for Nature, BBC Focus and Science Uncovered as well as appeared on BBC Radio 4 and at science festivals. His first book The Secret Science of Baby was published in 2022 and his new book is Physics Around the Clock.

Why science?

I only became really interested in science when I was around 15 years old - and to be honest I don’t really know why I preferred physics over the other sciences. I think I saw it as a challenge given the perception that the subject is difficult. But the more I studied physics, the more fascinating it became. I then chose to study physics at university and that’s when I became really hooked.

I found it particularly captivating how mathematics could be used to describe and understand the natural world. It could not only describe various phenomenon but also be used to predict things that then subsequently went on to be discovered – I found that concept mind blowing.

Why this book?

I’ve always been interested in science that is relatable to everyday life. It’s one reason why I wrote my first book – The Secret Science of Baby – which is all about the surprising physics you encounter during pregnancy, childbirth and even babyhood itself. 

Physics Around the Clock looks at the science you might unknowingly come across during the day, whether that is when making a coffee, taking the dog out for a walk or when pottering around in the garden. With this book I really wanted to get across that physics isn’t just an abstract subject about subatomic particles or cosmic black holes but is something that is all around us and relevant to most things we do day in, day out. 

What I really hope is that readers get a fresh perspective on everyday situations and look at these occurrences in a completely different light – even a falling water droplet from a dripping tap in the bath is full of rich and interesting physics. 

I was surprised by the electrical clumping of coffee grinding - was there anything that took you by surprise when researching these items?

Yes, the clumping of coffee grounds that occurs during grinding is interesting, not only because it happens in the first place but also as it affects how much coffee is extracted from the ground beans. Adding a drop of water can stop it from happening and also produce a more consistent and better brew. 

Another aspect I found interesting was the ejection of liquid droplets when flushing a toilet. All that chaotic motion in the cistern results in small particles shooting out, reaching face height within seconds. Such droplets were found to travel many meters in the air and in the process potentially distribute pathogens across the room – onto floors, walls and even the ceiling. 

Now you might think ah, simple, just close the lid before flushing, but research has found this isn’t the case. In fact, it can result in more stuff spreading onto the floor and walls. It’s certainly made me ponder bathroom cleanliness – and perhaps think about placing your toothbrush far away from the toilet, or better still, hide it away in a cupboard!  

What’s next?

On the immediate horizon, I have a public talk in London on 29 October at the Institute of Physics where I will be discussing the book. Longer term, Physics Around the Clock will be published in the US in April 2026 and there will also be Chinese translations – both traditional and simplified Chinese - later that year.

What’s exciting you at the moment? 

I have an idea for another physics-based popular-science book, which I think would be really interesting and fun to research and write. At the moment, it only exists in my head, but I am slowly starting to think about how to approach it, so watch this space!

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...