Skip to main content

Tales from a Robotic World - Dario Floreano and Nicola Nosengo *****

There have been a lot of books on artificial intelligence and robotics of late, and I was entirely prepared for this book to be a case of ‘same old, same old’, but in reality it was delightfully different. Dario Floreano and Nicola Nosengo set out to explore the future of robotics (typically in the 2040s/2050s) in a series of scenarios which involve telling a short science fiction story, but interlacing it with sections on where the technology is now and how it can be developed.

Some of the scenarios are very familiar, such as disaster recovery or sexbots, but others are distinctly intriguing in their own right. Two examples that jumped out at me were the idea of using swarms of aquatic robots to monitor and protect the Venice lagoon and of seeding Mars with robotic plants that can be used to prepare the ground and raw materials for incoming humans.

After a while, taking this approach presents the reader with a danger of the sections on different applications getting samey, so Floreano and Nosengo change tack towards the end of the book with chapters on how to compete with robots (when they might be coming for your jobs), how the robotics industry might develop as a business and the ethics of robotics. They point out in the section on the industry that robots are often the product of mega-corporations in fiction, but suggest this might be modelled too much on the car industry of the period the stories were written. (To be fair, though, IT is arguably dominated by mega-corporations today.) There are some interesting thoughts on how the industry might develop here.

The dangers of taking the partially science fiction approach are two-fold: it requires at least some writing talent from the authors to avoid presenting us with dull, worthy tales and it’s easy to get excited by the possibilities of the future and over-promise on what the technology will be capable of. On the writing side, while I don’t think Floreano and Nosengo will trouble the likes of Adam Roberts and Alastair Reynolds, their prose is fine. (I did wonder if they made a mistake in their intro, when they described this as a genre mastered by ‘Isaac Asimov… and Ian McEwan’ - no problems with Asimov, but were they thinking of Iain M. Banks, as McEwan’s SF career has hardly been stellar?)

There is an element of over-promising, as it’s not always obvious if it’s going to be possible to get from where we are now to where the authors are promising for the future. As Floreano and Nosengo themselves point out, being able to do something in a lab and being able to perform well out in the wild are very different things. Autonomous cars have regularly underperformed on real roads so far - and that's typically on big, grid-based US roads as opposed to the narrow winding roads of Europe. Similarly, robots are rarely properly tested in the real world before claims are made for the future capabilities - but given the steps forward that have been made, it’s entirely possible that at least some of the timescales suggested here will be feasible.

A couple of other small moans - the only illustrations were drawings accompanying the SF stories - I would loved to have seen photographs of the actual robots described in the present day sections. And (admittedly trivial, but the editor should have spotted this) - we read 'the sky outside her window was all but silent' which means that it was almost silent, not anything but silent, which is what the authors intended it to mean.

It’s so refreshing when a book you don’t expect to amount to much proves to be genuinely enjoyable and intriguing - and that was the case here. Great stuff.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more