Skip to main content

Tales from a Robotic World - Dario Floreano and Nicola Nosengo *****

There have been a lot of books on artificial intelligence and robotics of late, and I was entirely prepared for this book to be a case of ‘same old, same old’, but in reality it was delightfully different. Dario Floreano and Nicola Nosengo set out to explore the future of robotics (typically in the 2040s/2050s) in a series of scenarios which involve telling a short science fiction story, but interlacing it with sections on where the technology is now and how it can be developed.

Some of the scenarios are very familiar, such as disaster recovery or sexbots, but others are distinctly intriguing in their own right. Two examples that jumped out at me were the idea of using swarms of aquatic robots to monitor and protect the Venice lagoon and of seeding Mars with robotic plants that can be used to prepare the ground and raw materials for incoming humans.

After a while, taking this approach presents the reader with a danger of the sections on different applications getting samey, so Floreano and Nosengo change tack towards the end of the book with chapters on how to compete with robots (when they might be coming for your jobs), how the robotics industry might develop as a business and the ethics of robotics. They point out in the section on the industry that robots are often the product of mega-corporations in fiction, but suggest this might be modelled too much on the car industry of the period the stories were written. (To be fair, though, IT is arguably dominated by mega-corporations today.) There are some interesting thoughts on how the industry might develop here.

The dangers of taking the partially science fiction approach are two-fold: it requires at least some writing talent from the authors to avoid presenting us with dull, worthy tales and it’s easy to get excited by the possibilities of the future and over-promise on what the technology will be capable of. On the writing side, while I don’t think Floreano and Nosengo will trouble the likes of Adam Roberts and Alastair Reynolds, their prose is fine. (I did wonder if they made a mistake in their intro, when they described this as a genre mastered by ‘Isaac Asimov… and Ian McEwan’ - no problems with Asimov, but were they thinking of Iain M. Banks, as McEwan’s SF career has hardly been stellar?)

There is an element of over-promising, as it’s not always obvious if it’s going to be possible to get from where we are now to where the authors are promising for the future. As Floreano and Nosengo themselves point out, being able to do something in a lab and being able to perform well out in the wild are very different things. Autonomous cars have regularly underperformed on real roads so far - and that's typically on big, grid-based US roads as opposed to the narrow winding roads of Europe. Similarly, robots are rarely properly tested in the real world before claims are made for the future capabilities - but given the steps forward that have been made, it’s entirely possible that at least some of the timescales suggested here will be feasible.

A couple of other small moans - the only illustrations were drawings accompanying the SF stories - I would loved to have seen photographs of the actual robots described in the present day sections. And (admittedly trivial, but the editor should have spotted this) - we read 'the sky outside her window was all but silent' which means that it was almost silent, not anything but silent, which is what the authors intended it to mean.

It’s so refreshing when a book you don’t expect to amount to much proves to be genuinely enjoyable and intriguing - and that was the case here. Great stuff.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more