Skip to main content

Dario Floreano and Nicola Nosengo - Five Way Interview

Dario Floreano is Director of the Laboratory of Intelligent Systems at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL). He is the coauthor of Evolutionary Robotics and Bio-Inspired Artificial Intelligence (both published by the MIT Press). Nicola Nosengo is a science writer and science communicator at EPFL. His work has appeared in Nature, the Economist, Wired, and other publications, and he is the Chief Editor of Nature Italy. Their recent book is Tales from a Robotic World.

Why robotics?

Robotics is where Artificial Intelligence becomes tangible and personal. You may forget about the AI that powers your online searches, but it is hard to ignore the physical presence and motion of robots next to you. Robots have transformed factories, they are widely used in warehouses, hospitals, even homes - at least in the form of vacuum cleaners. Drones are becoming ubiquitous. And yet there is so much more that robots could do for us, and so many more places where they could prove useful, if they were more autonomous and capable of learning from their experiences and from us, if they could understanding the meaning of what they see and what they hear, if their mechanical bodies could be more adaptable and life-like. Thanks to the convergence of engineering, neuroscience, materials science, robotics is now entering a new phase, and that makes it one of the most exciting fields of science now.

Why this book?

Surprisingly, physical robots are largely neglected in the media and in books. Often, when people talk or write about "robots" nowadays they really talk of software-based AI, algorithms and data. Indeed, AI has had amazing successes lately, and it tends to overshadow physical robotics, which may seem to lag behind. In fact, making robots intelligent is harder than making intelligent data-crunching algorithms, but there are many recent advances that will make robots more capable and pervasive in the near future, and that deserve to be known by the public. With this book, we wanted to fill this gap and to show where robotics research is now. But we also understand that people want to know how all of that research will make a difference in their lives, which is why we stuck our neck out and described concrete future scenarios made possible by current-day research.

Despite all the promises, robots (and even driverless cars, particularly on winding European roads) always seem to be behind promised timescales. Why do we underestimate how long it takes for these technologies to mature?

Part of the reason is that, when it comes to predicting the pace of technological progress, we have been spoiled by what happened in computation, where computing power has grown exponentially according to what is usually called Moore's law, and the performances of all machines that rely on microchip have grown as a consequence. Many people have made the mistake of thinking that progress in robotics is a matter of increasing computing power, as it is the case with computing. But technologies that work with the physical world are more complicated than those that work with data - and that includes driverless cars, that are in effect robots that have to move in unpredictable environments and among people. They require not just improvements in algorithms and computing chips, but also in material science, mechanical engineering, sensor development, social interaction, cognitive science, and much more. Creating a new generation of robots requires new design and control principles, and a much closer collaboration with biologists, neuroscientists, and psychologists than in classical engineering or computer science. 

What’s next?

It would be fun and instructive to turn the book into a documentary series or a movie. Robots deserve to be seen live!

What’s exciting you at the moment?

N. I don't know if 'exciting' is the right word, but the conversion of our economy away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy is definitely the defining challenge of our era, one that will require a lot of new research combined with a lot of social innovation. It will be exciting to watch it happen over the next couple of decades, hoping that there is enough political will for it. By the way, robotics will have to be part of this transformation. We can't flood the world with yet more machines and make them energy-hungry, or harmful for the environment. The robots of the future will have to be sustainable, or they won't be at all.   

D. My research projects include edible robots and robotic food; bird-inspired robots capable of moving in the air, ground, forests, and water; human augmentation by robotic swarms, and evolutionary robots.

Interview by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a digest free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Decline and Fall of the Human Empire - Henry Gee ****

In his last book, Henry Gee impressed with his A (Very) Short History of Life on Earth - this time he zooms in on one very specific aspect of life on Earth - humans - and gives us not just a history, but a prediction of the future - our extinction. The book starts with an entertaining prologue, to an extent bemoaning our obsession with dinosaurs, a story that leads, inexorably towards extinction. This is a fate, Gee points out, that will occur for every species, including our own. We then cover three potential stages of the rise and fall of humanity (the book's title is purposely modelled on Gibbon) - Rise, Fall and Escape. Gee's speciality is palaeontology and in the first section he takes us back to explore as much as we can know from the extremely patchy fossil record of the origins of the human family, the genus Homo and the eventual dominance of Homo sapiens , pushing out any remaining members of other closely related species. As we move onto the Fall section, Gee gives ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Autobiography – Charles Darwin ****

I have to confess to putting off reading this book until the last moment, as I expected it to be a typical piece of Victorian sentimental unreadable stodge. I was wrong. Darwin’s little book (only 150 small pages with appendices) was originally written for his own children, and displays a very personal style of writing – though, as son Francis comments, his style was always more populist than was common then: “In writing he sometimes showed the same strong tendency to strong expressions that he did in conversation. Thus in the Origin, p440, there is a description of a larvel [sic] cirripede ‘with six pairs of beautifully constructed natatory legs, a pair of magnificent compound eyes and extremely complex antennae’. We used to laugh at him for this sentence, which we compared to an advertisement.” The main book is delightful because it demonstrates Darwin’s self-depreciating modesty, and the fascinating path he took from enthusiastic shooter of game, to amateur geologist (still his...
Post a Comment
Read more

Zero Degrees of Empathy [The Science of Evil] – Simon Baron-Cohen ***

I’ve been a real fan of previous books by Simon Baron-Cohen like  The Essential Difference , so opening this was one was a pleasant prospect. What I found was a book that wasn’t  bad … but that could have been a lot better. I got the impression of a book that had been rushed out without a lot of work going into it. The thesis at the heart of the book – that one of the important ‘circuits’ of the brain is the one dealing with empathy, and that individuals sit on an empathy spectrum, with some residing at zero degrees of empathy – is an interesting one. Baron-Cohen introduces us to three key personality types he defines as ‘zero-negative’ including psychopaths, plus types that are ‘zero-positive’ like those with Asperger’s. In a way both of these definitions are odd, in that his zero-negatives can actually have a lot of the kind of empathy that involves being able to read another person’s emotional state, and his zero-negatives can have a lot of the kind of empathy i...
Post a Comment
Read more