Skip to main content

Dario Floreano and Nicola Nosengo - Five Way Interview

Dario Floreano is Director of the Laboratory of Intelligent Systems at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL). He is the coauthor of Evolutionary Robotics and Bio-Inspired Artificial Intelligence (both published by the MIT Press). Nicola Nosengo is a science writer and science communicator at EPFL. His work has appeared in Nature, the Economist, Wired, and other publications, and he is the Chief Editor of Nature Italy. Their recent book is Tales from a Robotic World.

Why robotics?

Robotics is where Artificial Intelligence becomes tangible and personal. You may forget about the AI that powers your online searches, but it is hard to ignore the physical presence and motion of robots next to you. Robots have transformed factories, they are widely used in warehouses, hospitals, even homes - at least in the form of vacuum cleaners. Drones are becoming ubiquitous. And yet there is so much more that robots could do for us, and so many more places where they could prove useful, if they were more autonomous and capable of learning from their experiences and from us, if they could understanding the meaning of what they see and what they hear, if their mechanical bodies could be more adaptable and life-like. Thanks to the convergence of engineering, neuroscience, materials science, robotics is now entering a new phase, and that makes it one of the most exciting fields of science now.

Why this book?

Surprisingly, physical robots are largely neglected in the media and in books. Often, when people talk or write about "robots" nowadays they really talk of software-based AI, algorithms and data. Indeed, AI has had amazing successes lately, and it tends to overshadow physical robotics, which may seem to lag behind. In fact, making robots intelligent is harder than making intelligent data-crunching algorithms, but there are many recent advances that will make robots more capable and pervasive in the near future, and that deserve to be known by the public. With this book, we wanted to fill this gap and to show where robotics research is now. But we also understand that people want to know how all of that research will make a difference in their lives, which is why we stuck our neck out and described concrete future scenarios made possible by current-day research.

Despite all the promises, robots (and even driverless cars, particularly on winding European roads) always seem to be behind promised timescales. Why do we underestimate how long it takes for these technologies to mature?

Part of the reason is that, when it comes to predicting the pace of technological progress, we have been spoiled by what happened in computation, where computing power has grown exponentially according to what is usually called Moore's law, and the performances of all machines that rely on microchip have grown as a consequence. Many people have made the mistake of thinking that progress in robotics is a matter of increasing computing power, as it is the case with computing. But technologies that work with the physical world are more complicated than those that work with data - and that includes driverless cars, that are in effect robots that have to move in unpredictable environments and among people. They require not just improvements in algorithms and computing chips, but also in material science, mechanical engineering, sensor development, social interaction, cognitive science, and much more. Creating a new generation of robots requires new design and control principles, and a much closer collaboration with biologists, neuroscientists, and psychologists than in classical engineering or computer science. 

What’s next?

It would be fun and instructive to turn the book into a documentary series or a movie. Robots deserve to be seen live!

What’s exciting you at the moment?

N. I don't know if 'exciting' is the right word, but the conversion of our economy away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy is definitely the defining challenge of our era, one that will require a lot of new research combined with a lot of social innovation. It will be exciting to watch it happen over the next couple of decades, hoping that there is enough political will for it. By the way, robotics will have to be part of this transformation. We can't flood the world with yet more machines and make them energy-hungry, or harmful for the environment. The robots of the future will have to be sustainable, or they won't be at all.   

D. My research projects include edible robots and robotic food; bird-inspired robots capable of moving in the air, ground, forests, and water; human augmentation by robotic swarms, and evolutionary robots.

Interview by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a digest free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more