Skip to main content

Impossible, Probable and Improbable - John Gribbin ****

This is a compendium volume, bringing together three short books by the man who Americans would probably term the dean of British science writers, John Gribbin. These were Six Impossible Things, Seven Pillars of Science and Eight Improbable Possibilities. (Seeing a theme here?)

The first of these parts is my favourite, which is odd because it focuses on the interpretation of quantum theory, a topic that can veer towards 'angels dancing on the head of a pin' territory. This is not the detail of quantum physics itself, but rather the attempts to provide theories, mostly incapable of being disproved scientifically, that will explain how the apparent probabilistic nature of quantum reality somehow translates into the apparently non-probabilistic everyday world. These are often complex ideas that are difficult to get your head around, but Gribbin's coverage is as simple as it possibly could be.

The second section effectively builds the pillars not so much of science as the science of life, starting from the origins of atoms and leading through to the genetic code and hydrogen bonding. Although these stray from Gribbin's core subjects of physics and cosmology, he still is able to give excellent insights, particularly where the two fields overlap, such as his description of Fred Hoyle's contribution to our understanding of the way that stars created the elements.

The third section takes in theories that are the best we have, but seem unlikely or surprising. Some of these really stood out for me, notably how unusual the Moon is (and how that influences the environment on Earth), Newton's bucket - which is a brilliant introduction to consider a really difficult physical conundrum, and the origins of complex life on Earth. If I'm honest, I couldn't get as excited about, say, ice age rhythms and human evolution, or dark energy - in the case of the latter because it has been so widely covered - but everything here was worth reading. I do have one significant moan (about something I didn't notice when reading the individual title). At one point, Gribbin says that 'The only possible explanation' for the way galaxies rotate is huge halos of dark matter, where there is a perfectly good explanation in modified Newtonian dynamics. Neither explanation works perfectly as yet - but it simply isn't true that dark matter is the only possible explanation.

If you don't have any of the component titles, this is a handy way to get all three in one go. Having said that, I much preferred the individual books. In part this is because they were handsome little hardbacks which were just nicer to hold and read than this big lump of a book. But it's also because there's almost an element of the whole being less than the sum of the parts. The 21 topics (as Gribbin points out, half of Douglas Adams' 42 number, providing presumably half the answer to the ultimate question) might feel a little heavy going by the end because there are just too many different components, where reading each of the individual books was a delight. If you go for this compendium, I'd consider reading something else between each of the three sections.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more