Skip to main content

Impossible, Probable and Improbable - John Gribbin ****

This is a compendium volume, bringing together three short books by the man who Americans would probably term the dean of British science writers, John Gribbin. These were Six Impossible Things, Seven Pillars of Science and Eight Improbable Possibilities. (Seeing a theme here?)

The first of these parts is my favourite, which is odd because it focuses on the interpretation of quantum theory, a topic that can veer towards 'angels dancing on the head of a pin' territory. This is not the detail of quantum physics itself, but rather the attempts to provide theories, mostly incapable of being disproved scientifically, that will explain how the apparent probabilistic nature of quantum reality somehow translates into the apparently non-probabilistic everyday world. These are often complex ideas that are difficult to get your head around, but Gribbin's coverage is as simple as it possibly could be.

The second section effectively builds the pillars not so much of science as the science of life, starting from the origins of atoms and leading through to the genetic code and hydrogen bonding. Although these stray from Gribbin's core subjects of physics and cosmology, he still is able to give excellent insights, particularly where the two fields overlap, such as his description of Fred Hoyle's contribution to our understanding of the way that stars created the elements.

The third section takes in theories that are the best we have, but seem unlikely or surprising. Some of these really stood out for me, notably how unusual the Moon is (and how that influences the environment on Earth), Newton's bucket - which is a brilliant introduction to consider a really difficult physical conundrum, and the origins of complex life on Earth. If I'm honest, I couldn't get as excited about, say, ice age rhythms and human evolution, or dark energy - in the case of the latter because it has been so widely covered - but everything here was worth reading. I do have one significant moan (about something I didn't notice when reading the individual title). At one point, Gribbin says that 'The only possible explanation' for the way galaxies rotate is huge halos of dark matter, where there is a perfectly good explanation in modified Newtonian dynamics. Neither explanation works perfectly as yet - but it simply isn't true that dark matter is the only possible explanation.

If you don't have any of the component titles, this is a handy way to get all three in one go. Having said that, I much preferred the individual books. In part this is because they were handsome little hardbacks which were just nicer to hold and read than this big lump of a book. But it's also because there's almost an element of the whole being less than the sum of the parts. The 21 topics (as Gribbin points out, half of Douglas Adams' 42 number, providing presumably half the answer to the ultimate question) might feel a little heavy going by the end because there are just too many different components, where reading each of the individual books was a delight. If you go for this compendium, I'd consider reading something else between each of the three sections.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on