Skip to main content

Andrew Hunter Murray - Four Way Interview

Andrew Hunter Murray is a scriptwriter and fact-hunter for BBC2’s QI. He co-hosts the podcast No Such Thing As A Fish, which has had 200 million downloads, and has toured the UK, Europe and Australia. He also writes jokes and journalism for Private Eye magazine, and hosts the Eye’s podcast, Page 94. He is author of the science fiction novel The Sanctuary, published by Century.

Why science fiction?

Compared with ‘proper’ literature (big tongs there), sci-fi has had a slightly shonky reputation almost since the word go. It’s often seen as a slightly bonkers, pulpy poor cousin which you might read as a teenager before growing out of. But literally all the name means is that the story takes place in a world where the rules are somehow different, and explores human behaviour in response. Dozens of brilliant authors know not to be scared of it. Several Kazuo Ishiguro books? Sci-fi. Lots of Margaret Atwood? Sci-fi. The snooty view of sci-fi holds it back – but really it’s the loss of anyone not reading it. Plus, you can also have gigantic space spiders. 

Why this book?

The Sanctuary is an attempt to get to grips with the way the world is going to change in the next century, to present a vision of how things might go wrong, to show which utopians (read: billionaires) might try and swoop in to instruct the rest of the world how to live, and to tell the story of one young man discovering a seemingly perfect world on the brink of an enormous change. I think we’re all thinking about inequality now, and asking questions about the hyper-rich (a new category I’ve invented above the super-rich), so there’s a lot of that too. Also, my first book (The Last Day) was quite dystopian, and I thought it would be fun to set this one in heaven. Or, at least, somewhere which seems like heaven at first glance…

What’s next?

Another book, of course! Although I’m not going to say what it’s about just yet, because the idea is still at that lovely fragile stage where you can still see through the eggshell to the chick slowly incubating inside. And you don’t necessarily want to invite lots of people to look at the egg you’re growing because then the poor chick will feel lots of pressure and probably develop a complex. I’ve tried to think of a better way of describing this but I honestly think this might be the best one.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

Book-wise? Whatever comes next. I have literally no genre boundaries so my next four books lined up are the first ever book by PG Wodehouse, a piece of fragile 1950s domestic fiction, a German memoir from the trenches of the first world war and some loopy seventies spider-based sci-fi. These are just the topsoil of the TBR pile and mainly I’m excited to bring it back to some sort of structural integrity.

Interview by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a digest free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book
Post a Comment
Read more

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T
Post a Comment
Read more

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more