Skip to main content

Andrew Hunter Murray - Four Way Interview

Andrew Hunter Murray is a scriptwriter and fact-hunter for BBC2’s QI. He co-hosts the podcast No Such Thing As A Fish, which has had 200 million downloads, and has toured the UK, Europe and Australia. He also writes jokes and journalism for Private Eye magazine, and hosts the Eye’s podcast, Page 94. He is author of the science fiction novel The Sanctuary, published by Century.

Why science fiction?

Compared with ‘proper’ literature (big tongs there), sci-fi has had a slightly shonky reputation almost since the word go. It’s often seen as a slightly bonkers, pulpy poor cousin which you might read as a teenager before growing out of. But literally all the name means is that the story takes place in a world where the rules are somehow different, and explores human behaviour in response. Dozens of brilliant authors know not to be scared of it. Several Kazuo Ishiguro books? Sci-fi. Lots of Margaret Atwood? Sci-fi. The snooty view of sci-fi holds it back – but really it’s the loss of anyone not reading it. Plus, you can also have gigantic space spiders. 

Why this book?

The Sanctuary is an attempt to get to grips with the way the world is going to change in the next century, to present a vision of how things might go wrong, to show which utopians (read: billionaires) might try and swoop in to instruct the rest of the world how to live, and to tell the story of one young man discovering a seemingly perfect world on the brink of an enormous change. I think we’re all thinking about inequality now, and asking questions about the hyper-rich (a new category I’ve invented above the super-rich), so there’s a lot of that too. Also, my first book (The Last Day) was quite dystopian, and I thought it would be fun to set this one in heaven. Or, at least, somewhere which seems like heaven at first glance…

What’s next?

Another book, of course! Although I’m not going to say what it’s about just yet, because the idea is still at that lovely fragile stage where you can still see through the eggshell to the chick slowly incubating inside. And you don’t necessarily want to invite lots of people to look at the egg you’re growing because then the poor chick will feel lots of pressure and probably develop a complex. I’ve tried to think of a better way of describing this but I honestly think this might be the best one.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

Book-wise? Whatever comes next. I have literally no genre boundaries so my next four books lined up are the first ever book by PG Wodehouse, a piece of fragile 1950s domestic fiction, a German memoir from the trenches of the first world war and some loopy seventies spider-based sci-fi. These are just the topsoil of the TBR pile and mainly I’m excited to bring it back to some sort of structural integrity.

Interview by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a digest free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Are Eating the Earth - Michael Grunwald *****

If I'm honest, I assumed this would be another 'oh dear, we're horrible people who are terrible to the environment', worthily dull title - so I was surprised to be gripped from early on. The subject of the first chunk of the book is one man, Tim Searchinger's fight to take on the bizarrely unscientific assumption that held sway that making ethanol from corn, or burning wood chips instead of coal, was good for the environment. The problem with this fallacy, which seemed to have taken in the US governments, the EU, the UK and more was the assumption that (apart from carbon emitted in production) using these 'grown' fuels was carbon neutral, because the carbon came out of the air. The trouble is, this totally ignores that using land to grow fuel means either displacing land used to grow food, or displacing land that had trees, grass or other growing stuff on it. The outcome is that when we use 'E10' petrol (with 10% ethanol), or electricity produced by ...

Battle of the Big Bang - Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Harper *****

It's popular science Jim, but not as we know it. There have been plenty of popular science books about the big bang and the origins of the universe (including my own Before the Big Bang ) but this is unique. In part this is because it's bang up to date (so to speak), but more so because rather than present the theories in an approachable fashion, the book dives into the (sometimes extremely heated) disputed debates between theoreticians. It's still popular science as there's no maths, but it gives a real insight into the alternative viewpoints and depth of feeling. We begin with a rapid dash through the history of cosmological ideas, passing rapidly through the steady state/big bang debate (though not covering Hoyle's modified steady state that dealt with the 'early universe' issues), then slow down as we get into the various possibilities that would emerge once inflation arrived on the scene (including, of course, the theories that do away with inflation). ...

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...