Skip to main content

Andrew Hunter Murray - Four Way Interview

Andrew Hunter Murray is a scriptwriter and fact-hunter for BBC2’s QI. He co-hosts the podcast No Such Thing As A Fish, which has had 200 million downloads, and has toured the UK, Europe and Australia. He also writes jokes and journalism for Private Eye magazine, and hosts the Eye’s podcast, Page 94. He is author of the science fiction novel The Sanctuary, published by Century.

Why science fiction?

Compared with ‘proper’ literature (big tongs there), sci-fi has had a slightly shonky reputation almost since the word go. It’s often seen as a slightly bonkers, pulpy poor cousin which you might read as a teenager before growing out of. But literally all the name means is that the story takes place in a world where the rules are somehow different, and explores human behaviour in response. Dozens of brilliant authors know not to be scared of it. Several Kazuo Ishiguro books? Sci-fi. Lots of Margaret Atwood? Sci-fi. The snooty view of sci-fi holds it back – but really it’s the loss of anyone not reading it. Plus, you can also have gigantic space spiders. 

Why this book?

The Sanctuary is an attempt to get to grips with the way the world is going to change in the next century, to present a vision of how things might go wrong, to show which utopians (read: billionaires) might try and swoop in to instruct the rest of the world how to live, and to tell the story of one young man discovering a seemingly perfect world on the brink of an enormous change. I think we’re all thinking about inequality now, and asking questions about the hyper-rich (a new category I’ve invented above the super-rich), so there’s a lot of that too. Also, my first book (The Last Day) was quite dystopian, and I thought it would be fun to set this one in heaven. Or, at least, somewhere which seems like heaven at first glance…

What’s next?

Another book, of course! Although I’m not going to say what it’s about just yet, because the idea is still at that lovely fragile stage where you can still see through the eggshell to the chick slowly incubating inside. And you don’t necessarily want to invite lots of people to look at the egg you’re growing because then the poor chick will feel lots of pressure and probably develop a complex. I’ve tried to think of a better way of describing this but I honestly think this might be the best one.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

Book-wise? Whatever comes next. I have literally no genre boundaries so my next four books lined up are the first ever book by PG Wodehouse, a piece of fragile 1950s domestic fiction, a German memoir from the trenches of the first world war and some loopy seventies spider-based sci-fi. These are just the topsoil of the TBR pile and mainly I’m excited to bring it back to some sort of structural integrity.

Interview by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a digest free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more