Skip to main content

Working with AI - Thomas Davenport and Steven Miller ***

There have been plenty of books on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and how it will impact our lives from the dire warnings of Cathy O'Neil's Weapons of Math Destruction to Melanie Mitchell's in-depth exploration of the technology Artificial Intelligence, but in Working with AI, Thomas Davenport and Steven Miller give us a new viewpoint that is interesting, if a little worrying. If we compare writing about AI with the Star Wars movies, it's as if almost every AI book I've read so far, like the films, has been written from the viewpoint of the rebels. But this is a book that solidly takes the viewpoint of the empire.

Unfortunately, although it covers a fair number of AI applications, it's also written more like a business book that a popular science/technology book, and as such it's pretty dull. Anyone familiar with the business book genre will recognise that deadly moment when you get to a box that's a case study. It's going to be boring. This book contains 29 case studies, one after the other, by the end of which I was quietly groaning.

However, there were definitely some insights to be gained here. In that range of case studies, there were several standouts. The main thesis that Davenport and Miller are proposing is that, despite some issues, artificial intelligence will not destroy vast swathes of jobs, but will instead improve them by taking on the boring bits, not (on the whole) displacing humans, but working alongside them. Perhaps the best example of this was the robotic weed picker, which made a farm worker's job more interesting and did something that, frankly, no human really wants to do. Admittedly, in this kind of application there would be fewer humans employed, but it feels like a genuinely beneficial change.

What was worrying, though, in the dark side orientation of this book was that there was very little consideration of some of the other potential negatives of AI - in fact, it felt the authors were almost celebrating some of these. Several case studies highlighted this approach, for example one on using AI to support a help desk, a couple on making decisions on issuing insurance policies and mortgages and one on policing.

The help desk example felt particularly insidious. The idea was that the software monitored conversations between customers and the help desk to improve the quality of interactions. But apart from a passing mention of it, the authors don't really acknowledge the Big Brother aspect of software checking your every word, rating your performance and pushing you into conformity with the required groupthink. Similarly, we heard about all the advantages for the companies using software to decide if customers should be given an insurance policy or mortgage, but not the well-documented problems raised by opaque machine learning systems using entirely unsuitable data to reject individuals. The policing example is an infamous one, and the authors had to acknowledge there have been serious problems with such systems producing racist results and making particular areas even worse than they were before, but merely say this has to be avoided, without giving any evidence that this is even possible to do.

I'm sure Davenport and Miller thought they were doing something useful in focusing on the ways that AI will not necessarily replace human workers but rather would augment their abilities. But I don't think it's possible, as was done here, to ignore some of the other dangers of AI like lack of transparency, misuse of data, surveillance and more. You have to take the view across the board. 

I'd suggest this book is important reading to get a balanced picture of AI, if you can cope with the kind of mangled business-speak sentences that crop up, such as 'She works particularly at the top of the prospect funnel, trying to move leads along in the sales process and operationalize a disciplined prospecting and selling process.' The book does illustrate a few examples where having an AI helper can be genuinely beneficial to workers. And plenty more where it can benefit companies to the disadvantage of either workers or customers. This is surely valuable data, whether you side with Luke Skywalker or Darth Vader.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are
Post a Comment
Read more

Space Oddities - Harry Cliff *****

In this delightfully readable book, Harry Cliff takes us into the anomalies that are starting to make areas of physics seems to be nearing a paradigm shift, just as occurred in the past with relativity and quantum theory. We start with, we are introduced to some past anomalies linked to changes in viewpoint, such as the precession of Mercury (explained by general relativity, though originally blamed on an undiscovered planet near the Sun), and then move on to a few examples of apparent discoveries being wrong: the BICEP2 evidence for inflation (where the result was caused by dust, not the polarisation being studied),  the disappearance of an interesting blip in LHC results, and an apparent mistake in the manipulation of numbers that resulted in alleged discovery of dark matter particles. These are used to explain how statistics plays a part, and the significance of sigmas . We go on to explore a range of anomalies in particle physics and cosmology that may indicate either a breakdown i
Post a Comment
Read more

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re
Post a Comment
Read more