Skip to main content

Working with AI - Thomas Davenport and Steven Miller ***

There have been plenty of books on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and how it will impact our lives from the dire warnings of Cathy O'Neil's Weapons of Math Destruction to Melanie Mitchell's in-depth exploration of the technology Artificial Intelligence, but in Working with AI, Thomas Davenport and Steven Miller give us a new viewpoint that is interesting, if a little worrying. If we compare writing about AI with the Star Wars movies, it's as if almost every AI book I've read so far, like the films, has been written from the viewpoint of the rebels. But this is a book that solidly takes the viewpoint of the empire.

Unfortunately, although it covers a fair number of AI applications, it's also written more like a business book that a popular science/technology book, and as such it's pretty dull. Anyone familiar with the business book genre will recognise that deadly moment when you get to a box that's a case study. It's going to be boring. This book contains 29 case studies, one after the other, by the end of which I was quietly groaning.

However, there were definitely some insights to be gained here. In that range of case studies, there were several standouts. The main thesis that Davenport and Miller are proposing is that, despite some issues, artificial intelligence will not destroy vast swathes of jobs, but will instead improve them by taking on the boring bits, not (on the whole) displacing humans, but working alongside them. Perhaps the best example of this was the robotic weed picker, which made a farm worker's job more interesting and did something that, frankly, no human really wants to do. Admittedly, in this kind of application there would be fewer humans employed, but it feels like a genuinely beneficial change.

What was worrying, though, in the dark side orientation of this book was that there was very little consideration of some of the other potential negatives of AI - in fact, it felt the authors were almost celebrating some of these. Several case studies highlighted this approach, for example one on using AI to support a help desk, a couple on making decisions on issuing insurance policies and mortgages and one on policing.

The help desk example felt particularly insidious. The idea was that the software monitored conversations between customers and the help desk to improve the quality of interactions. But apart from a passing mention of it, the authors don't really acknowledge the Big Brother aspect of software checking your every word, rating your performance and pushing you into conformity with the required groupthink. Similarly, we heard about all the advantages for the companies using software to decide if customers should be given an insurance policy or mortgage, but not the well-documented problems raised by opaque machine learning systems using entirely unsuitable data to reject individuals. The policing example is an infamous one, and the authors had to acknowledge there have been serious problems with such systems producing racist results and making particular areas even worse than they were before, but merely say this has to be avoided, without giving any evidence that this is even possible to do.

I'm sure Davenport and Miller thought they were doing something useful in focusing on the ways that AI will not necessarily replace human workers but rather would augment their abilities. But I don't think it's possible, as was done here, to ignore some of the other dangers of AI like lack of transparency, misuse of data, surveillance and more. You have to take the view across the board. 

I'd suggest this book is important reading to get a balanced picture of AI, if you can cope with the kind of mangled business-speak sentences that crop up, such as 'She works particularly at the top of the prospect funnel, trying to move leads along in the sales process and operationalize a disciplined prospecting and selling process.' The book does illustrate a few examples where having an AI helper can be genuinely beneficial to workers. And plenty more where it can benefit companies to the disadvantage of either workers or customers. This is surely valuable data, whether you side with Luke Skywalker or Darth Vader.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The Infinity Machine - Sebastian Mallaby ****

It's very quickly clear that Sebastian Mallaby is a huge Demis Hassabis fan - writing about the only child prodigy and teen genius ever who was also a nice, rounded personality. After a few chapters, though, things settle down (I'm reminded of Douglas Adams' description of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ) and we get a good, solid trip through the journey that gave us DeepMind, their AlphaGo and AlphaFold programs, the sudden explosion of competition on the AI front and thoughts on artificial general intelligence. Although Mallaby does occasionally still go into fan mode - reading this you would think that AlphaFold had successfully perfectly predicted the structure of every protein, where it is usually not sufficiently accurate for its results to have direct practical application - we get a real feel for the way this relatively unusual company was swiftly and successfully developed away from Silicon Valley. It's readable and gives an important understanding of...

Nanotechnology - Rahul Rao ****

There was a time when nanotechnology was both going to transform the world and wipe us out - a similar position to our view of AI today. On the positive transformation side there was K. Eric Drexler's visions in the 1986 Engines of Creation. Arguably as much science fiction as engineering possibilities, it predicted the ability to use vast armies of assemblers to put objects together from individual atoms.  On the negative side was the vision of grey goo, out of control nanotechnology consuming all in its path as it made more and more copies of itself. In 2003, for instance, the then Prince Charles made the headlines  when newspapers reported ‘The prince has raised the spectre of the “grey goo” catastrophe in which sub-microscopic machines designed to share intelligence and replicate themselves take over and devour the planet.’ These days the expectations have been eased down a notch or two. Where nanotechnology has succeeded, it has been with the likes of atom-thick mat...