Skip to main content

The Magick of Matter - Felix Flicker ****

This is a book about condensed matter physics, surely a particularly boring-sounding name for one of the most interesting parts of the subject. It's about the physics of things we encounter. When you think about it, it's quite odd that most popular physics books are about things like quantum physics and cosmology and particle physics that don't deal with things we can put our hands on or see. Of course quantum physics impacts lots of everyday objects through electronics etc., but it's still driven by particles we can't see or experience in a normal sense.

Felix Flicker introduces us to two key aspects of the physics of tangible stuff - emergence and chaos (though in practice, chaos only gets a passing mention). Because, as he points out, the problem with purely looking at the particle level is that stuff really is the more than the sum of its parts. The chaos and uncertainty part was handled excellently in Tim Palmer's recent The Primacy of Doubt, but this book works very much alongside that by focussing more on emergence, rather them competing in any way. 

We start off on the states of matter and, somewhat unexpectedly, magnetism, with Flicker making the kind of statement that needs a lot more unpacking than it gets 'A magnet does everything you'd expect a state of matter to do.' we then move on to phase transitions and so on. Flicker keeps things interest by leaping about and pulling in unexpected little side illustrations and examples, such as the way that a field of bleating virtual sheep that can influence its neighbours' colour.

We then get onto crystals and the special characteristics of the crystalline state - something that extends far beyond our typical association with shiny transparent things to take in metals and polarising materials, lattices and symmetry. A section on thermodynamics seems to me to be cheating a bit - because quite a lot of what's covered is about interactions at an atomic or molecular scale, though you can see that there's an element of emergence involved. I felt the same to a degree about the next chapter on quantum physics. But we do then get into more dramatically emergent stuff with superconductors, Josephson junctions and the like. With the exception of the aspect I'm about to moan about, this is all well-handled and consistently engaging. It combines fascinating facts with real insights into what is in some cases relatively unfamiliar aspects of physics.

So far so good, but there was one aspect of this book that several times inclined me to throw it against the wall - and the four stars are despite, rather than thanks to this. Flicker has decided to try to make condensed matter physics more approachable by framing it as having parallels with magic. (Thankfully, in the text, as opposed to the title, we largely avoid that twee spelling 'Magick'.) This means, for example, that the chapters begin with some frankly pretty unreadable lowest-common-denominator swords-and-sorcery-without-the-swords fantasy writing. It's (thankfully) possible to skip over these and not lose anything, but unfortunately Flicker also regularly brings magic and woo in to give us reference points as he talks about physics. (He seriously includes the sound of one hand clapping.) But the whole point of the book should be that this topic doesn't need gimmicks. It's genuinely interesting in its own right. Why, oh why?

I'm recommending the book despite, rather than because of its magical flummery. This is a really interesting topic. But you may have to restrain that book throwing urge too.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more