Celestial (SF) - M. D. Lachlan ***

An important point first - despite being labelled as such, this is not science fiction at all. It's science fantasy, a once-popular genre that has become relatively uncommon these days. Celestial is very much in the same category as Roger Zelazny's Roadmarks and Madeleine L'Engle's A Wrinkle in Time. (I don't usually review fantasy here, but I'm making an exception for this one, partly because I didn't realise it was.)

The setting is an alternative 1977, where the US and the USSR are both sending manned missions to the Moon. A mysterious hatch has been discovered in the Moon's surface, leading to what may be alien technology - something both sides want to get their hands on. The central character, Ziggy da Luca is a linguist, an apparently strange choice for a NASA crew, who ends up having to deal with difficulties both from her own crew and Soviet cosmonauts. I ought to stress it being an alternative 1977 isn't why I'm calling it fantasy - that seems to be a pretty much accepted part of the SF genre.

So far, so Arrival. But once they're through the hatch, the astronauts and cosmonauts experience a world of total weirdness that for me seemed to have three strong points of comparison. The first is the final segment of the film 2001, A Space Odyssey - with its combination of psychedelic effects on the way in and distinctly mystical woo in what then occurs. The second is Lewis Carroll's work. There's both the nightmare/dream aspects of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass, and the mix of dark/light in the quest of The Hunting of the Snark - though in this case totally lacking any sense of humour.

Finally, there was a lot that reminded me of the weird lost ships in Karl Drinkwater's Lost Solace series, though Celestial benefits considerably from having a group of people to react to what's happening, rather than a single individual with only an AI for company in Lost Solace.

For me, there was just too much weirdness - I can cope with the bit at the end of 2001 because the main part of the film is so brilliant, but here, apart from opening and closing chapters, pretty much the entire book is set in the randomly odd environment, which has very little attempt at scientific plausibility, relying instead on a mythical/fantasy foundation.

Nonetheless, the book is well written and I stuck with it rather than giving up part way through because there was always the promise of rationality returning (it just never did). If you want to try something really different from a traditional space SF novel, this is well worth a try. But for me, this snark was a boojum.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here

Comments

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life. To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier. It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...

Search This Blog