Skip to main content

The Future of Seeing - Daniel Sodickson ****

At first glance a book about imaging technology sounds like one of those promotional titles that technology companies make about themselves that no one will ever read - but with a light, approachable touch, Daniel Sodickson takes us from the imaging mechanisms of nature, through the early technology to the present and the potential future - featuring both benefits and risks - with aplomb.

It wouldn't have struck me to include eyes in a history of imaging, but Sodickson successfully does so, going back even further to the first biological cells developing. As he asks in his opening '"OK, wait just a second!" I hear you cry. "What does imaging have to do with the first cells?"' - this chatty approach pulls the reader in very effectively. (You'll have to read the book to get the answer.) We then get on to the first augmentation of nature, using lenses to modify the flow of light. 

As always there's the potential for a non-historian to distort history of science, but on the whole Sodickson avoids the familiar traps, though I slightly question the idea of Robert Hooke being called 'England's Leonardo' by anyone serious, and was a bit disappointed with the way a chapter that finishes with introducing photography and moving pictures with Niépce and Daguerre without mentioning Fox Talbot or Muybridge.

The advantage of seeing things differently from the imager's viewpoint is we can then move on straight to X-rays and computerised tomography (in a chapter bluntly labelled 'slicing without cutting'). At this point, Sodickson takes a step back into the nature of an image - and what they are in the modern sense. He pulls together the current position with a dip into the democratisation of imaging due to ubiquitous technology and the impact of AI before plunging into future possibilities - from the use of non-optical imaging, to how AI will go much further not just in creating images but in understanding image content, covering positives, for instance in medical use, but also negatives in terms of privacy. There's no doubt that imaging's impact on the everyday will continue to develop and expand. As Sodickson says in his epilogue 'The story of imaging, meanwhile, is not just a story of experts and their tools. It is a broader human story.'

My only real complaint about the book is the chapter 'The community of imagers' which has photos (not surprisingly) of a page-full of people working in the field with a series of (metaphorical) snapshots of who they are and what they cover. It's common for scientists writing popular science to overdo acknowledgements of other scientists, and there's always a danger of it becoming a slightly tedious list of accomplishments. There are a few interesting points in here, but I'm not sure it improves the book.

Overall, an interesting take on a topic that is rarely thought of by the rest of us as a field in its own right, and hence is refreshing to experience in Sodickson's capable hands.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more