Skip to main content

The Future of Seeing - Daniel Sodickson ****

At first glance a book about imaging technology sounds like one of those promotional titles that technology companies make about themselves that no one will ever read - but with a light, approachable touch, Daniel Sodickson takes us from the imaging mechanisms of nature, through the early technology to the present and the potential future - featuring both benefits and risks - with aplomb.

It wouldn't have struck me to include eyes in a history of imaging, but Sodickson successfully does so, going back even further to the first biological cells developing. As he asks in his opening '"OK, wait just a second!" I hear you cry. "What does imaging have to do with the first cells?"' - this chatty approach pulls the reader in very effectively. (You'll have to read the book to get the answer.) We then get on to the first augmentation of nature, using lenses to modify the flow of light. 

As always there's the potential for a non-historian to distort history of science, but on the whole Sodickson avoids the familiar traps, though I slightly question the idea of Robert Hooke being called 'England's Leonardo' by anyone serious, and was a bit disappointed with the way a chapter that finishes with introducing photography and moving pictures with Niépce and Daguerre without mentioning Fox Talbot or Muybridge.

The advantage of seeing things differently from the imager's viewpoint is we can then move on straight to X-rays and computerised tomography (in a chapter bluntly labelled 'slicing without cutting'). At this point, Sodickson takes a step back into the nature of an image - and what they are in the modern sense. He pulls together the current position with a dip into the democratisation of imaging due to ubiquitous technology and the impact of AI before plunging into future possibilities - from the use of non-optical imaging, to how AI will go much further not just in creating images but in understanding image content, covering positives, for instance in medical use, but also negatives in terms of privacy. There's no doubt that imaging's impact on the everyday will continue to develop and expand. As Sodickson says in his epilogue 'The story of imaging, meanwhile, is not just a story of experts and their tools. It is a broader human story.'

My only real complaint about the book is the chapter 'The community of imagers' which has photos (not surprisingly) of a page-full of people working in the field with a series of (metaphorical) snapshots of who they are and what they cover. It's common for scientists writing popular science to overdo acknowledgements of other scientists, and there's always a danger of it becoming a slightly tedious list of accomplishments. There are a few interesting points in here, but I'm not sure it improves the book.

Overall, an interesting take on a topic that is rarely thought of by the rest of us as a field in its own right, and hence is refreshing to experience in Sodickson's capable hands.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more