Skip to main content

The Future of Seeing - Daniel Sodickson ****

At first glance a book about imaging technology sounds like one of those promotional titles that technology companies make about themselves that no one will ever read - but with a light, approachable touch, Daniel Sodickson takes us from the imaging mechanisms of nature, through the early technology to the present and the potential future - featuring both benefits and risks - with aplomb.

It wouldn't have struck me to include eyes in a history of imaging, but Sodickson successfully does so, going back even further to the first biological cells developing. As he asks in his opening '"OK, wait just a second!" I hear you cry. "What does imaging have to do with the first cells?"' - this chatty approach pulls the reader in very effectively. (You'll have to read the book to get the answer.) We then get on to the first augmentation of nature, using lenses to modify the flow of light. 

As always there's the potential for a non-historian to distort history of science, but on the whole Sodickson avoids the familiar traps, though I slightly question the idea of Robert Hooke being called 'England's Leonardo' by anyone serious, and was a bit disappointed with the way a chapter that finishes with introducing photography and moving pictures with Niépce and Daguerre without mentioning Fox Talbot or Muybridge.

The advantage of seeing things differently from the imager's viewpoint is we can then move on straight to X-rays and computerised tomography (in a chapter bluntly labelled 'slicing without cutting'). At this point, Sodickson takes a step back into the nature of an image - and what they are in the modern sense. He pulls together the current position with a dip into the democratisation of imaging due to ubiquitous technology and the impact of AI before plunging into future possibilities - from the use of non-optical imaging, to how AI will go much further not just in creating images but in understanding image content, covering positives, for instance in medical use, but also negatives in terms of privacy. There's no doubt that imaging's impact on the everyday will continue to develop and expand. As Sodickson says in his epilogue 'The story of imaging, meanwhile, is not just a story of experts and their tools. It is a broader human story.'

My only real complaint about the book is the chapter 'The community of imagers' which has photos (not surprisingly) of a page-full of people working in the field with a series of (metaphorical) snapshots of who they are and what they cover. It's common for scientists writing popular science to overdo acknowledgements of other scientists, and there's always a danger of it becoming a slightly tedious list of accomplishments. There are a few interesting points in here, but I'm not sure it improves the book.

Overall, an interesting take on a topic that is rarely thought of by the rest of us as a field in its own right, and hence is refreshing to experience in Sodickson's capable hands.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mathematics with Love – Mary Stopes-Roe *****

Admittedly it’s early days (this review is written in January), but this, for me, is the surprise hit of the year so far! I approached this book with trepidation, but found it absolutely delightful. It is described on the cover as the “courtship correspondence of Barnes Wallis, inventor of the bouncing bomb”, and contains a series of letters between Wallis and his cousin and eventual wife Molly Bloxham, along with some useful annotation by their daughter, Mary. The courtship itself is not without difficulties, as Wallis was 18 years older than the 17-year-old Molly at the start of the correspondence, and her father, not surprisingly, wasn’t too pleased about the interest of such an elderly suitor, but that isn’t the only reason the letters are interesting – it’s also because of maths, and Wallis’s position in the UK as the engineering hero of the Second World War. (Incidentally, it seemed very strange to see letters addressed to “Barnes” – I had always assumed Barnes Wallis was a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Time - Jim Al-Khalili *****

By a small margin Jim Al-Khalili's The World According to Physics is my favourite of his books, both because the 'three pillars' concept at its heart works so well - but also because it's short. On Time is somewhat heavier, but thankfully not a wrist-buster. It might seem at first sight odd that a book on a subset of physics is considerably longer than one covering the whole thing, but time is one of those subjects that inevitably involves considerable complexities and needs depth. As Al-Khalili establishes, it's hard to think of any other scientific concept where our perception of it - what he refers to as manifest time or psychological time - is so different from the view from physics. Some physicists go so far as to suggest that time doesn't exist at all. In the book, Al-Khalili sets out (to my mind quite successfully) both to explain why they think this is the case, but also why it's not the best interpretation of time. I'd certainly note that I...
Post a Comment
Read more