Skip to main content

The Giant Leap - Caleb Scharf ****

This is surely Caleb Scharf's most personal work - and certainly quite different from some of his earlier output, such as his excellent Gravity's Engines. In part this is a technological exploration of space travel, not unlike Final Frontier, but it is also about the future of humanity, more reminiscent of The Decline and Fall of the Human Empire, but with a more positive outlook. Overall, it was fascinating reading.

Let's take those two aspects separately. As always, Scharf gives us plenty of meat in an approachable fashion, whether it's delving into the rocket equation, considering the pros and considerable limitations of Mars as a destination for humans (the chapter is pointedly called The Red Siren), or taking on the possibilities of asteroids. And even in the semi-technical aspect of the first Moon landing we get some more personal detail - I hadn't realised until reading this that Scharf was English by birth (being bathed in a sink at a key moment).

Although there is plenty of content, this side of the book occasionally lacks storytelling nouse. For instance, when describing the hilarious way that the New York Times (incorrectly) laid into rocket pioneer Robert Goddard, accusing him amongst other things of lacking 'the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools'. This demands a quote, but Scharf just says 'Famously, in 1920, an article was published in which Goddard speculated on one day reaching the Moon, a New York Times editorial publicly and disparagingly dismissed his ideas about rockets working in space,' before going on to the Times' much later retraction. It's a bit like explaining a joke without ever telling it.

The other aspect of the book, linked by a common thread of the story of Darwin and the voyage of the Beagle, is more about the future of humanity and how it is linked to our ability to boldly go and so forth. This is fine, though it can feel a little vague when put alongside the more factual aspects. And while it's true that extremely long term we either leave the Earth or the species will perish, I can't help but feel that on the timescale where we have concerns, our species would no longer exist in any recognisable form - we've only been around a couple of hundred thousand years, where this is a billion years away.

One small moan - I'm all in favour of stressing the amazing contributions made by the likes of Emmy Noether to the development of mathematics and physics, but from reading this book, you might think that no one apart from Émilie du Châtelet, Mary Somerville and Noether really thought about anything relevant to space travel between Newton and Tsiolkovsky (apart from a few small contributions from the likes of Leibniz and Laplace). It's essential to tell us about women of science, but it should be in a more realistic context.

Overall, for me the whole concept of the need for 'Dispersal' (with a slightly pretentious capital letter) is perhaps driven more by Star Trek fun than any real view of the future. Is it really true that 'life is busy making its transition to being interplanetary right now'? I suspect human space travel will remain a niche activity with far less impact than probes and satellites helping us on Earth for many lifetimes to come. Nonetheless, it's an interesting and distinctly different book that deserves to do well. Recommended.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically?  Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
Post a Comment
Read more