Skip to main content

The Giant Leap - Caleb Scharf ****

This is surely Caleb Scharf's most personal work - and certainly quite different from some of his earlier output, such as his excellent Gravity's Engines. In part this is a technological exploration of space travel, not unlike Final Frontier, but it is also about the future of humanity, more reminiscent of The Decline and Fall of the Human Empire, but with a more positive outlook. Overall, it was fascinating reading.

Let's take those two aspects separately. As always, Scharf gives us plenty of meat in an approachable fashion, whether it's delving into the rocket equation, considering the pros and considerable limitations of Mars as a destination for humans (the chapter is pointedly called The Red Siren), or taking on the possibilities of asteroids. And even in the semi-technical aspect of the first Moon landing we get some more personal detail - I hadn't realised until reading this that Scharf was English by birth (being bathed in a sink at a key moment).

Although there is plenty of content, this side of the book occasionally lacks storytelling nouse. For instance, when describing the hilarious way that the New York Times (incorrectly) laid into rocket pioneer Robert Goddard, accusing him amongst other things of lacking 'the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools'. This demands a quote, but Scharf just says 'Famously, in 1920, an article was published in which Goddard speculated on one day reaching the Moon, a New York Times editorial publicly and disparagingly dismissed his ideas about rockets working in space,' before going on to the Times' much later retraction. It's a bit like explaining a joke without ever telling it.

The other aspect of the book, linked by a common thread of the story of Darwin and the voyage of the Beagle, is more about the future of humanity and how it is linked to our ability to boldly go and so forth. This is fine, though it can feel a little vague when put alongside the more factual aspects. And while it's true that extremely long term we either leave the Earth or the species will perish, I can't help but feel that on the timescale where we have concerns, our species would no longer exist in any recognisable form - we've only been around a couple of hundred thousand years, where this is a billion years away.

One small moan - I'm all in favour of stressing the amazing contributions made by the likes of Emmy Noether to the development of mathematics and physics, but from reading this book, you might think that no one apart from Émilie du Châtelet, Mary Somerville and Noether really thought about anything relevant to space travel between Newton and Tsiolkovsky (apart from a few small contributions from the likes of Leibniz and Laplace). It's essential to tell us about women of science, but it should be in a more realistic context.

Overall, for me the whole concept of the need for 'Dispersal' (with a slightly pretentious capital letter) is perhaps driven more by Star Trek fun than any real view of the future. Is it really true that 'life is busy making its transition to being interplanetary right now'? I suspect human space travel will remain a niche activity with far less impact than probes and satellites helping us on Earth for many lifetimes to come. Nonetheless, it's an interesting and distinctly different book that deserves to do well. Recommended.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more