Skip to main content

Thinking Small and Large - Peter Forbes ***

I've a huge amount of time for Peter Forbes as a writer. Both his The Gecko's Foot on the science behind some of nature's most remarkable abilities and Dazzled and Deceived on mimicry and camouflage in nature and human endeavour were brilliant. But I'm afraid I found it harder to engage with Thinking Small and Large. There's plenty of good stuff in it, but it didn't grab me in the same way.

The topic here is the fundamental importance of microbes to life on Earth. By microbes, he is referring to single-celled organisms including bacteria, archaea, algae, fungi, protists and viruses, though Forbes does also point how much even in multi-celled organisms (like us) the important stuff happens on a microscopic scale.

We start off by looking how we naturally incline to what we can see and directly experience - and how the common cultural idea that humans are in control of life on Earth (a concept that was originally down to divine intent, but now is more technological) leads us astray. Reading this feels a bit like being told off, which isn't a good start. We then get into theories of how life came into existence and, for instance, the importance of the Krebs cycle, so beautifully explored in Nick Lane's Transformer (Lane gets plenty of acknowledgment). From here we take on the role of microbial life in natural cycles, the formation complex cells (in part by absorbing microbes, notably mitochondria), and so forth.

Things are pulled together (circling back to the original telling off) with the dangers of 'sapioncentralism' - this is a little different from human exceptionalism which is when biologists moan that humans aren't special (which clearly they are in some ways). Rather it suggests that we shouldn't take our special nature to mean we are independent of or can ignore all other life, a viewpoint that, as Forbes points out, is distinctly undermined by the Covid pandemic, not to mention the vast numbers of ways that microbes are essential for the planet as a whole to function and to be habitable for us.

The final chapter is probably the most interesting, where we are told 'how bacteria can create a parallel, fossil-free carbon economy'. Here we see how single-celled protein could 'per unit land... reach an over ten-fold higher protein yield and at the least twice the caloric yield compared with any staple crop.' We then go on to see how good use of bacteria can enhance conventional crops, and, for instance, the use of bacteria to produce ethanol from waste gases (fuel that does produce carbon dioxide when burned, but at least it would have gone into the atmosphere anyway).

As that chapter demonstrates, there is plenty of interesting stuff in this book, and I'd encourage you to buy it - but aspects of it didn't work for me as a reader.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Nobody Understands Quantum Physics - Frank Verstraete and Céline Broeckaert **

It's with a heavy heart that I have to say that I could not get on with this book. The structure is all over the place, while the content veers from childish remarks to unexplained jargon. Frank Versraete is a highly regarded physicist and knows what he’s talking about - but unfortunately, physics professors are not always the best people to explain physics to a general audience and, possibly contributed to by this being a translation, I thought this book simply doesn’t work. A small issue is that there are few historical inaccuracies, but that’s often the case when scientists write history of science, and that’s not the main part of the book so I would have overlooked it. As an example, we are told that Newton's apple story originated with Voltaire. Yet Newton himself mentioned the apple story to William Stukeley in 1726. He may have made it up - but he certainly originated it, not Voltaire. We are also told that ‘Galileo discovered the counterintuitive law behind a swinging o...

How to Keep a Plane in the Sky - Alex Davies ****

If there's one big gap in the science writing sphere, it's popular engineering (you can quibble over whether engineering is science, but where else would you put popular engineering?). Alex Davies does the field a real service with this insightful introduction to the world of test engineering. The concept is simple. If we build something and sell it, we need to test it to make sure that it won't fail in a way that's dangerous to the consumer. The most obvious example is airliners, which feature at some length, but this applies to everything from cuddly toys to hair straighteners: someone needs to predict what could go wrong and to put the product through its paces to see if it will survive under any reasonable circumstances. When Davies is telling a story of test engineering in action, the book is a delight. He opens with the way that real bears are used to test if bears can get into coolers and trash cans - and the impressive ways these animals can  circumvent human in...

On the Equality of All Things - Carlo Rovelli ****

There is a wide gulf between the worldviews of physicists and philosophers. Many physicists present a rather sweetly naive, child-like view of the world, where philosophers bring a distinctly more adult, cynical tone. This being the case, it can be a little worrying when a physicist dips a toe into the philosophical mire. Infamously, in The Grand Design , Stephen Hawking and co-author Leonard Mlodinow told us that philosophy was now dead because science could deal with anything it had previously been needed for. Thankfully, Carlo Rovelli is not trying to do away with philosophy, though it has to be said that when he veers into the topic that physicist's naivety can make it feel like the philosophising of an earnest eighteen-year-old. Take the opening paragraph, which tells us 'electrons and minds, stones and laws, judgements and galaxies do not essentially differ in nature from one another. They are notions that illuminate each other'. I almost expected a Pink Floyd soundtr...