Skip to main content

Age of Extinction (SF) - Mark Gomes ****

I'm giving this dive into a dystopian AI-dominated future four stars despite some significant flaws because I enjoyed it. Mark Gomes likens the impact of AI on humanity over the next few years to one of the palaeological mass extinctions, though in this case potentially destroying a single species - us. Set in the present and near future, we see the AI-driven technology of billionaire Nolan Scent (a musky scent, I suspect) beginning to take away the majority of jobs that aren't manual labour, service industry or working on new technology.

This is bad enough in itself and certainly has potential parallels in the real world (though Gomes' timescales are wildly over-exaggerated, as you can't, for instance, set up AI-automated factories to do all manufacturing in a couple of years). But Scent also has a chip that, when implanted in the brain, leaves workers contented with their lot - so, for example, people previously doing skilled jobs are happy becoming cleaners.

The protagonists other than Scent himself are his daughter Molly, who helps him but has concerns about what's happening, an outspoken professor who is struggling to get the world to accept that the AI future dooms everyone except the tech bros, and a brilliant researcher, Ethan, who has taken the technology to the next level using a quantum computer, enabling him to give his locked-in brother the ability to interact with the outside world.

The book's structure of pseudo-factual reporting, then a personal story, then the main storyline for each of seven sections gets in the way of feeling any real engagement with the storyline and characters for the first few chapters, but once we get more of Molly and Ethan, the writing becomes more effective and I genuinely wanted to find out what happened next. The ending is, frankly, weird - but doesn't ruin the book.

I do need to mention those flaws, though. The page layout is terrible - there is no indentation of paragraphs, for example, making dialogue difficult to read. Anyone who has looked at a professionally produced book to see how it's done should have noticed this. The book could also do with an edit - for example there are changes of tense mid-paragraph, and some inconsistency - on page 58, for instance, we read 'Molly's confidence faltered...' then on page 60, later in the same scene, 'For the first time that evening, her confidence wavered.' And the dates in the 'factual reporting' sections need a serious revision with, for example, a report from 2024 being about something happening several years later.

Leaving aside the ending, there are also some issues with the technology portrayed. It's a bit unfortunate that this book has come out just as people are realising how much generative AI makes things up, probably slowing down AI takeover considerably. And the imagined neural chips have real problems: there is no evidence people would undergo brain surgery to get a job, and the chips are far too capable (not only controlling emotions, but apparently able to fix a congenital heart defect). There's also no explanation of how the economy would work - apparently most of the population would become really poor, but by cutting out the middle class, Scent would be destroying the mass market for his sales.

Despite these issues, I mostly enjoyed the ride, and it is a useful reminder of how AI and robotics have the potential to make a major impact on everyday lives.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more