Skip to main content

Joe Tidy - Five Way Interview

Joe Tidy is the BBC’s first Cyber Correspondent and the author of Ctrl+ Alt+ Chaos: How Teenage Hackers Hijack the Internet. Joe has built a reputation for investigating the darker sides of the internet and how technology affects the way people live. He is known for tracking down and speaking directly to hackers and criminals who are responsible for some of the biggest cyber incidents of recent times. His top six BBC News documentaries, including The Teenage Millionaire Hacker and The Russian Hackers, have garnered more than 7 million views. Before joining the BBC, he was a correspondent at Sky News where he regularly reported on technology and began his decade-long obsession with cybercrime after reporting on the infamous 2014 Christmas day Lizard Squad attack.

Why this book?

This book charts the life of crime of, what I think is, the most hated hacker in history. I interviewed Julius Kivimaki back in 2014 when he was the figurehead for Lizard Squad - a notorious attention-seeking teen hacker group. It was my first ever cyber story and started my decade-long obsession with cybercrime. Kivimaki came back into the headlines in 2022, linked to the enormously and incredibly cruel hack of a therapy company in Finland. I wanted to know how a computer game playing kid became one of the most wanted cyber criminals in the world - and what we can learn about teenage hacking culture in the process. 

Why do you think the attitude of hackers has changed so much in the last 30 or so years?

In my book I settle on a couple of theories. Firstly - the rise of Twitter (now X). This social network, used by groups like Anonymous in the 2010s, showed that hackers can become internet famous. I also think Bitcoin has played a part in boosting the motivation of these kids and young people to turn down the dark side of hacking for monetary gain. There was also a strange period of time in the 2010s when internet culture in general turned pretty dark and misogynistic with movements like Gamer Gate. This could have played a part too.

Are justice systems starting to take the crimes of underage hackers more seriously?

Not really. I argue in my book that the cyber security world and society in general still doesn’t know how to handle teenagers who get caught up in cybercrime. There is a mixed bag of responses that doesn't make a lot of sense. In some jurisdictions they are punished with harsh sentences. In others - in fact most - they are given a slap on the wrist and often reoffend as we see time and again in my book. But the issue is so complex, and it is hard to judge what is right. Police and judges are in a difficult position of trying not to ruin kids' lives for carrying out sometimes minor crimes - but also need to come down hard on the kids that seem to feel invincible. 

What’s next?

For me personally I am planning on digging further into the international element. Is there a difference between the pathways of Russian/ Chinese/ North Korean hackers? Or is the western journey universal? I'm hoping to get into some of this in a podcast series I am currently making with the BBC.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

Launching a book! It's been a phenomenal experience. It's a very solitary thing to do and there were many times in the last year when I would be typing away late at night not knowing if anyone would be interested in the story and topic I am obsessed with. But so far the response has been amazing and it is very exciting!

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...
Post a Comment
Read more

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...
Post a Comment
Read more