Skip to main content

Joe Tidy - Five Way Interview

Joe Tidy is the BBC’s first Cyber Correspondent and the author of Ctrl+ Alt+ Chaos: How Teenage Hackers Hijack the Internet. Joe has built a reputation for investigating the darker sides of the internet and how technology affects the way people live. He is known for tracking down and speaking directly to hackers and criminals who are responsible for some of the biggest cyber incidents of recent times. His top six BBC News documentaries, including The Teenage Millionaire Hacker and The Russian Hackers, have garnered more than 7 million views. Before joining the BBC, he was a correspondent at Sky News where he regularly reported on technology and began his decade-long obsession with cybercrime after reporting on the infamous 2014 Christmas day Lizard Squad attack.

Why this book?

This book charts the life of crime of, what I think is, the most hated hacker in history. I interviewed Julius Kivimaki back in 2014 when he was the figurehead for Lizard Squad - a notorious attention-seeking teen hacker group. It was my first ever cyber story and started my decade-long obsession with cybercrime. Kivimaki came back into the headlines in 2022, linked to the enormously and incredibly cruel hack of a therapy company in Finland. I wanted to know how a computer game playing kid became one of the most wanted cyber criminals in the world - and what we can learn about teenage hacking culture in the process. 

Why do you think the attitude of hackers has changed so much in the last 30 or so years?

In my book I settle on a couple of theories. Firstly - the rise of Twitter (now X). This social network, used by groups like Anonymous in the 2010s, showed that hackers can become internet famous. I also think Bitcoin has played a part in boosting the motivation of these kids and young people to turn down the dark side of hacking for monetary gain. There was also a strange period of time in the 2010s when internet culture in general turned pretty dark and misogynistic with movements like Gamer Gate. This could have played a part too.

Are justice systems starting to take the crimes of underage hackers more seriously?

Not really. I argue in my book that the cyber security world and society in general still doesn’t know how to handle teenagers who get caught up in cybercrime. There is a mixed bag of responses that doesn't make a lot of sense. In some jurisdictions they are punished with harsh sentences. In others - in fact most - they are given a slap on the wrist and often reoffend as we see time and again in my book. But the issue is so complex, and it is hard to judge what is right. Police and judges are in a difficult position of trying not to ruin kids' lives for carrying out sometimes minor crimes - but also need to come down hard on the kids that seem to feel invincible. 

What’s next?

For me personally I am planning on digging further into the international element. Is there a difference between the pathways of Russian/ Chinese/ North Korean hackers? Or is the western journey universal? I'm hoping to get into some of this in a podcast series I am currently making with the BBC.

What’s exciting you at the moment?

Launching a book! It's been a phenomenal experience. It's a very solitary thing to do and there were many times in the last year when I would be typing away late at night not knowing if anyone would be interested in the story and topic I am obsessed with. But so far the response has been amazing and it is very exciting!

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Infinity Machine - Sebastian Mallaby ****

It's very quickly clear that Sebastian Mallaby is a huge Demis Hassabis fan - writing about the only child prodigy and teen genius ever who was also a nice, rounded personality. After a few chapters, though, things settle down (I'm reminded of Douglas Adams' description of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ) and we get a good, solid trip through the journey that gave us DeepMind, their AlphaGo and AlphaFold programs, the sudden explosion of competition on the AI front and thoughts on artificial general intelligence. Although Mallaby does occasionally still go into fan mode - reading this you would think that AlphaFold had successfully perfectly predicted the structure of every protein, where it is usually not sufficiently accurate for its results to have direct practical application - we get a real feel for the way this relatively unusual company was swiftly and successfully developed away from Silicon Valley. It's readable and gives an important understanding of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nanotechnology - Rahul Rao ****

There was a time when nanotechnology was both going to transform the world and wipe us out - a similar position to our view of AI today. On the positive transformation side there was K. Eric Drexler's visions in the 1986 Engines of Creation. Arguably as much science fiction as engineering possibilities, it predicted the ability to use vast armies of assemblers to put objects together from individual atoms.  On the negative side was the vision of grey goo, out of control nanotechnology consuming all in its path as it made more and more copies of itself. In 2003, for instance, the then Prince Charles made the headlines  when newspapers reported ‘The prince has raised the spectre of the “grey goo” catastrophe in which sub-microscopic machines designed to share intelligence and replicate themselves take over and devour the planet.’ These days the expectations have been eased down a notch or two. Where nanotechnology has succeeded, it has been with the likes of atom-thick mat...
Post a Comment
Read more