Chasm City (SF) - Alastair Reynolds ****

As a big fan of Alastair Reynolds’ Prefect Dreyfus books I have struggled with some of his earlier novels set in the same universe, and was distinctly nervous at the prospect of 634 pages. I’m also not a huge fan of novels that interlace multiple storylines, so after being gripped by the opening sequence with a space elevator disaster, it was worrying to then plunge back to the origin story of the planet’s human habitation, though to give Reynolds his due, this is not entirely what it first seems.

Thanks to the skill that Reynolds often demonstrates, he keeps the reader engaged in both the ‘present’ experiences of the central character in the dangerous mix of ruin and extravagance that is the titular city, and the past story of the founding of his (separate) home world. I think the reason I prefer the Dreyfus novels is that in that setting the civilisation has not collapsed, so despite the dire threats they feel more upbeat. Here amongst the devastation caused by the nanotechnology ‘melding plague’ and the threat of a an alien civilisation that wipes out intelligence if it is spotted, there is very little light relief, just constant menace and skin-of-the-teeth escapes. This doesn’t prevent the storytelling being gripping, but it would benefit from more light and shade.

Like many good hard SF writers, Reynolds like to add a bit of physical justification for engineering wonders - there is one slip up here where an alien species is able to manipulate the mass of (say) people by modifying the Higgs field - unfortunately 99% of nucleon mass (which is the vast majority of mass of physical things, including people) has nothing to do with the Higgs field.

While it was still far too long for my liking I did really enjoy Chasm City (which dates back to 2000) and it has renewed my interest in reading more of the Revelation Space series after being somewhat disappointed by the book of that name and the novella collection Diamond Dogs, Turquoise Days.

Paperback:
Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support our online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all reviews and Brian's online articles or subscribe free here

Comments

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge Introducing … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as … for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily, Introducing Artificial Intelligence is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

Search This Blog