Chasm City (SF) - Alastair Reynolds ****

As a big fan of Alastair Reynolds’ Prefect Dreyfus books I have struggled with some of his earlier novels set in the same universe, and was distinctly nervous at the prospect of 634 pages. I’m also not a huge fan of novels that interlace multiple storylines, so after being gripped by the opening sequence with a space elevator disaster, it was worrying to then plunge back to the origin story of the planet’s human habitation, though to give Reynolds his due, this is not entirely what it first seems.

Thanks to the skill that Reynolds often demonstrates, he keeps the reader engaged in both the ‘present’ experiences of the central character in the dangerous mix of ruin and extravagance that is the titular city, and the past story of the founding of his (separate) home world. I think the reason I prefer the Dreyfus novels is that in that setting the civilisation has not collapsed, so despite the dire threats they feel more upbeat. Here amongst the devastation caused by the nanotechnology ‘melding plague’ and the threat of a an alien civilisation that wipes out intelligence if it is spotted, there is very little light relief, just constant menace and skin-of-the-teeth escapes. This doesn’t prevent the storytelling being gripping, but it would benefit from more light and shade.

Like many good hard SF writers, Reynolds like to add a bit of physical justification for engineering wonders - there is one slip up here where an alien species is able to manipulate the mass of (say) people by modifying the Higgs field - unfortunately 99% of nucleon mass (which is the vast majority of mass of physical things, including people) has nothing to do with the Higgs field.

While it was still far too long for my liking I did really enjoy Chasm City (which dates back to 2000) and it has renewed my interest in reading more of the Revelation Space series after being somewhat disappointed by the book of that name and the novella collection Diamond Dogs, Turquoise Days.

Paperback:
Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support our online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all reviews and Brian's online articles or subscribe free here

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog