Chasm City (SF) - Alastair Reynolds ****

As a big fan of Alastair Reynolds’ Prefect Dreyfus books I have struggled with some of his earlier novels set in the same universe, and was distinctly nervous at the prospect of 634 pages. I’m also not a huge fan of novels that interlace multiple storylines, so after being gripped by the opening sequence with a space elevator disaster, it was worrying to then plunge back to the origin story of the planet’s human habitation, though to give Reynolds his due, this is not entirely what it first seems.

Thanks to the skill that Reynolds often demonstrates, he keeps the reader engaged in both the ‘present’ experiences of the central character in the dangerous mix of ruin and extravagance that is the titular city, and the past story of the founding of his (separate) home world. I think the reason I prefer the Dreyfus novels is that in that setting the civilisation has not collapsed, so despite the dire threats they feel more upbeat. Here amongst the devastation caused by the nanotechnology ‘melding plague’ and the threat of a an alien civilisation that wipes out intelligence if it is spotted, there is very little light relief, just constant menace and skin-of-the-teeth escapes. This doesn’t prevent the storytelling being gripping, but it would benefit from more light and shade.

Like many good hard SF writers, Reynolds like to add a bit of physical justification for engineering wonders - there is one slip up here where an alien species is able to manipulate the mass of (say) people by modifying the Higgs field - unfortunately 99% of nucleon mass (which is the vast majority of mass of physical things, including people) has nothing to do with the Higgs field.

While it was still far too long for my liking I did really enjoy Chasm City (which dates back to 2000) and it has renewed my interest in reading more of the Revelation Space series after being somewhat disappointed by the book of that name and the novella collection Diamond Dogs, Turquoise Days.

Paperback:
Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support our online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all reviews and Brian's online articles or subscribe free here

Comments

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here. We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...

Search This Blog