Skip to main content

Revelation Space (SF) - Alastair Reynolds ***

Having recently been hugely impressed by Machine Vendetta, the closing part of Alastair Reynolds' Prefect Dreyfus trilogy, I was delighted to notice in its prelims that these books were set 'within the Revelation Space universe'. I rushed to get a copy of Revelation Space, the first of five novels I hadn't read - and I'm very pleased that I did. One of the interesting things about this book is seeing just how far Reynolds' writing has come on in the near quarter century between the novels.

What we get here is a future universe beautifully conceived with lots of crunchy detail. The science behind it is carefully thought through, and even though the scale of the technology can be overblown, it only feels like fantasy in the final few chapters. Reynolds gives us a complex but well set out plot line and though it's very much in the style where terms are thrown in and you've got go with the flow and work out what they are referring to over time, it never feels bewildering. There are ancient alien remains, political machinations, lots of AI and nanotech wizardry and, though this isn't military SF, enough use of large scale weaponry to satisfy those who like a bit of explosive action.

This sounds like it should be a five star book, and I feel a little mean only giving it three - but there were a couple of reasons that reflect, perhaps, a lack of maturity in Reynolds' writing at this point that made it far less satisfying than his later books. Firstly it's way too long. There's nothing wrong with a long space opera - it's a genre that fits well with the chunky book approach - but there were three separate points in reading  it where it felt like nothing much was progressing for 50 to 100 pages. I just wanted him to get on with things.

The other big issue for me was a lack of character identification. There are three main characters - each rather irritatingly introduced in initially separate interwoven timelines, some of them years apart. I was concerned that I would lose track as we jumped back and forward years, not just at the chapter level where the dates were stated, but also in interior sections without any indication of change of point in time. Even back then, Reynolds was skilled enough for this not to have proved a problem. But despite the three timelines coalescing I continued to find it difficult to feel connected. You might say that this reflects that those three main characters are interestingly written: each as positive and negative points rather than being pure heroes. But in the slow revelation of their motives and interactions, I found it difficult to care about any of them.

My not entirely positive feelings about Revelation Space do nothing to lessen my admiration of this author's books - and after some recovery time I will definitely be moving on to the second in the series. Reynolds is one of our best writers of intelligent space opera, and despite its limitations, Revelation Space remains gloriously imaginative.

Paperback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who Invented the Computer? – Ian Watson

Ian Watson is the author of  The Universal Machine  and featured in a recent  Four Way Interview . Saturday June 23 2012 was the centenary of the birth of Alan Turing, the troubled genius who invented the modern computer. Why though do so few people recognize his name and his great achievements? In 1936 English mathematician Alan Turing, published a paper,  On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem . This became the foundation of computing. In it Turing presented a theoretical machine that could solve any problem that could be described by instructions encoded on a paper tape. A Turing Machine could calculate square roots, whilst another might solve Sudoku puzzles. Turing demonstrated you could construct a single  Universal Machine  that could simulate any Turing Machine. One machine solving any problem for which a program could be written – sound familiar? He’d invented the computer. Then,  computers  were peop...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Star Book – Peter Grego ****

This attractive landscape format book combines an excellent introduction to the stars and basic astronomy with a set of star maps, plus in depth looks at some of the stars featured, with a  bonus section on the solar system. Amazon says it’s a hardback, but in fact it’s a paperback with a rather ingenious cover – you can’t tell from the photo, but the words ‘The Star Book’ are punched through as a series of holes that show the white paper of the next page beneath. Like many astronomy/space books, the cover lacks shelf appeal because it is mostly black, but at least there is some original thought here. Unlike many books in this format which tend to concentrate on the pictures, there is a good deal of excellent text by Peter Grego, so there was no feeling that you were only getting the star maps and star ‘biographies’, something these days much more suited to an iPad or smartphone app. Instead, the opening 30 or so pages give a very good introduction that would be valuable to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ignorance: How it drives science – Stuart Firestein *****

This is a delightful little book that really gets you thinking. I stress the ‘little’ part not as a negative, but as a good thing. There is nothing worse than fat, bloated popular science books where the author feels they have to get 120,000 words to be taken seriously. This is the sort of book that can be read in a couple of hours – but you will get so much more out of it than one of those tedious doorstops. The premise underlying the book is in once sense extremely simple, yet is fundamental to an understanding of what science is and what scientists do. And it is an understanding that is totally at odds with the typical way science is portrayed both in university lectures and popular science books. As Stuart Firestein points out, what is important is not the facts, but rather the area of ignorance. The interesting part and the fundamental heart of science is not about what we know, but about what we don’t know and where we want to look next. Take this lovely quote: ‘Working ...
Post a Comment
Read more